Effect of Hemoglobin and Blood Glucose Levels on CT Perfusion Ischemic Core Estimation: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ESCAPE-NA1 Trial.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology Pub Date : 2024-11-26 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000209939
Umberto Pensato, Salome Bosshart, Alexander Stebner, Axel Rohr, Timothy J Kleinig, Rishi Gupta, Götz Thomalla, Ji Hoe Heo, Mayank Goyal, Andrew M Demchuk, Michael D Hill, Johanna M Ospel
{"title":"Effect of Hemoglobin and Blood Glucose Levels on CT Perfusion Ischemic Core Estimation: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ESCAPE-NA1 Trial.","authors":"Umberto Pensato, Salome Bosshart, Alexander Stebner, Axel Rohr, Timothy J Kleinig, Rishi Gupta, Götz Thomalla, Ji Hoe Heo, Mayank Goyal, Andrew M Demchuk, Michael D Hill, Johanna M Ospel","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000209939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>CT perfusion (CTP) maps can estimate the ischemic core in acute ischemic stroke based on distinctive cerebral blood flow thresholds. However, metabolic factors beyond perfusion influence the tissue tolerance to ischemia and the infarct growth rate. Underestimating the ischemic core volume (ICV) might result in overestimating the salvageable cerebral tissue and, consequently, overestimating the potential clinical benefits of reperfusion therapies. We aim to evaluate whether baseline hemoglobin and blood glucose levels influence the accuracy of baseline CTP ICV estimations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Large vessel occlusion stroke patients investigated with baseline CTP undergoing thrombectomy with near-complete reperfusion and without parenchymal hemorrhage from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial were included. Patients were subdivided into anemic (hemoglobin <130 g/L for men and <120 g/L for women) and nonanemic groups, and hyperglycemic (blood glucose level >7 mmol/L) and normoglycemic groups. Ischemic core underestimated volume (ICuV) was calculated: final infarct volume minus CTP-based ICV. The primary outcome was the presence of \"perfusion scotoma\" defined as ICuV ≥10 mL. Presence of \"perfusion scotoma\" and median ICuV were compared between anemic vs nonanemic and hyperglycemic vs normoglycemic patients using nonparametric tests and multivariable binary logistic regression with adjustment for baseline variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty-two of 1,105 (15%) patients were included (median age 70.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 61-80.4], 50.6% women). The median ICuV was 7.26 mL (IQR 0-25.63). Seventy-eight (48%) patients demonstrated perfusion scotoma. Forty-two (25.7%) patients were anemic, and 65 (40.1%) were hyperglycemic. In univariable analysis, the hyperglycemic group had a higher prevalence of perfusion scotoma (65% [n = 40] vs 39% [n = 38], <i>p</i> = 0.006) and larger ICuV (17.79 mL [IQR 1.57-42.75] vs 6 mL [-0.31 to 12.51], <i>p</i> = 0.003) compared to normoglycemic patients. No significant ICuV differences between patients with and without anemia were seen. Multivariable regression analysis revealed an association between perfusion scotoma and hyperglycemia, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.48 (95% CI 1.25-4.92), and between perfusion scotoma and blood glucose levels, adjusted OR 1.19 (95% CI 1.03-1.39) per 1 mmol/L increase.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In our study, CTP-based ischemic core underestimation was common and associated with higher baseline blood glucose levels. Individual metabolic factors beyond perfusion that critically influence the infarct growth rate should be considered when interpreting baseline CTP estimations of ischemic core.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"103 10","pages":"e209939"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000209939","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: CT perfusion (CTP) maps can estimate the ischemic core in acute ischemic stroke based on distinctive cerebral blood flow thresholds. However, metabolic factors beyond perfusion influence the tissue tolerance to ischemia and the infarct growth rate. Underestimating the ischemic core volume (ICV) might result in overestimating the salvageable cerebral tissue and, consequently, overestimating the potential clinical benefits of reperfusion therapies. We aim to evaluate whether baseline hemoglobin and blood glucose levels influence the accuracy of baseline CTP ICV estimations.

Methods: Large vessel occlusion stroke patients investigated with baseline CTP undergoing thrombectomy with near-complete reperfusion and without parenchymal hemorrhage from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial were included. Patients were subdivided into anemic (hemoglobin <130 g/L for men and <120 g/L for women) and nonanemic groups, and hyperglycemic (blood glucose level >7 mmol/L) and normoglycemic groups. Ischemic core underestimated volume (ICuV) was calculated: final infarct volume minus CTP-based ICV. The primary outcome was the presence of "perfusion scotoma" defined as ICuV ≥10 mL. Presence of "perfusion scotoma" and median ICuV were compared between anemic vs nonanemic and hyperglycemic vs normoglycemic patients using nonparametric tests and multivariable binary logistic regression with adjustment for baseline variables.

Results: One hundred sixty-two of 1,105 (15%) patients were included (median age 70.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 61-80.4], 50.6% women). The median ICuV was 7.26 mL (IQR 0-25.63). Seventy-eight (48%) patients demonstrated perfusion scotoma. Forty-two (25.7%) patients were anemic, and 65 (40.1%) were hyperglycemic. In univariable analysis, the hyperglycemic group had a higher prevalence of perfusion scotoma (65% [n = 40] vs 39% [n = 38], p = 0.006) and larger ICuV (17.79 mL [IQR 1.57-42.75] vs 6 mL [-0.31 to 12.51], p = 0.003) compared to normoglycemic patients. No significant ICuV differences between patients with and without anemia were seen. Multivariable regression analysis revealed an association between perfusion scotoma and hyperglycemia, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.48 (95% CI 1.25-4.92), and between perfusion scotoma and blood glucose levels, adjusted OR 1.19 (95% CI 1.03-1.39) per 1 mmol/L increase.

Discussion: In our study, CTP-based ischemic core underestimation was common and associated with higher baseline blood glucose levels. Individual metabolic factors beyond perfusion that critically influence the infarct growth rate should be considered when interpreting baseline CTP estimations of ischemic core.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血红蛋白和血糖水平对 CT 灌注缺血核心估计的影响:ESCAPE-NA1试验的事后分析。
背景和目的:CT 灌注(CTP)图可根据不同的脑血流阈值估计急性缺血性卒中的缺血核心。然而,除灌注外,代谢因素也会影响组织对缺血的耐受性和梗死的生长速度。低估缺血核心容积(ICV)可能会导致高估可挽救的脑组织,从而高估再灌注疗法的潜在临床疗效。我们旨在评估基线血红蛋白和血糖水平是否会影响基线 CTP ICV 估计的准确性:方法:纳入ESCAPE-NA1试验中接受近乎完全再灌注血栓切除术且无实质出血的基线CTP的大血管闭塞性卒中患者。患者被细分为贫血组(血红蛋白 7 mmol/L)和血糖正常组。缺血核心低估容积(ICuV)的计算方法是:最终梗死容积减去基于 CTP 的 ICV。主要结果是是否存在 "灌注阴影",定义为 ICuV ≥10 mL。使用非参数检验和多变量二元逻辑回归对贫血与非贫血患者、高血糖与正常血糖患者的 "灌注阴影 "存在情况和中位 ICuV 进行了比较,并对基线变量进行了调整:1 105 名患者中有 162 名(15%)被纳入研究(中位年龄为 70.5 岁[四分位数间距(IQR)61-80.4],50.6% 为女性)。ICuV 中位数为 7.26 mL(IQR 0-25.63)。78名患者(48%)出现灌注性视网膜障。42名患者(25.7%)贫血,65名患者(40.1%)高血糖。在单变量分析中,与血糖正常的患者相比,高血糖组的灌注性视网膜瘤发生率更高(65% [n = 40] vs 39% [n = 38],p = 0.006),ICuV 更大(17.79 mL [IQR 1.57-42.75] vs 6 mL [-0.31 至 12.51],p = 0.003)。贫血和非贫血患者的 ICuV 没有明显差异。多变量回归分析显示,灌注影踪与高血糖之间存在关联,调整后的比值比 (OR) 为 2.48 (95% CI 1.25-4.92);灌注影踪与血糖水平之间存在关联,调整后的比值比 (OR) 为每增加 1 mmol/L 1.19 (95% CI 1.03-1.39):讨论:在我们的研究中,基于 CTP 的缺血核心低估很常见,并且与较高的基线血糖水平相关。在解释缺血核心的基线 CTP 估计值时,应考虑除灌注外严重影响梗死生长速度的其他代谢因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Reasoning: A 65-Year-Old Woman With Isolated Macroglossia as the Initial Presentation of a Rare Disease. Eculizumab in AQP4-IgG NMOSD: Efficacy in the Real World and Potential Warning of Meningococcal Vaccines. Moving Things Along: A New Model for the NINDS Clinical Neurotherapeutic Pipeline. Prevalence of Progression Independent of Relapse Activity and Relapse-Associated Worsening in Patients With AQP4-IgG-Positive NMOSD. Teaching NeuroImage: Occipital Condyle Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1