Pediatric Resuscitation Skill of Bag-Tube Manual Ventilation: Developing and Using a Mobile Simulation Program to Assess Competency of a Multiprofessional PICU Team.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003612
Anna E McCormick, Stuart H Friess, Kimberly S Quayle, John C Lin, Arushi Manga
{"title":"Pediatric Resuscitation Skill of Bag-Tube Manual Ventilation: Developing and Using a Mobile Simulation Program to Assess Competency of a Multiprofessional PICU Team.","authors":"Anna E McCormick, Stuart H Friess, Kimberly S Quayle, John C Lin, Arushi Manga","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the skill of bag-tube manual ventilation with the flow-inflating bag in multiprofessional PICU team members using a mobile simulation unit.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational study from January 2022 to April 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>In situ mobile simulation using the flow-inflating bag in an academic PICU.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Multiprofessional PICU team members including nurses, respiratory therapists, nurse practitioners, fellows, and attendings.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We enrolled 129 participants who twice completed 1-minute tasks performing bag-tube manual ventilation with a flow-inflating bag. Sessions were video recorded; four could not be analyzed. Only 30% of participants reported being very to extremely confident, and the majority (62%) reported infrequent skill performance. Task success was defined as achieving target pressure ranges during 80% of the delivered breaths, respiratory rate (RR) of 25-35 breaths/min, and successful pop-off valve engagement. Only five of 129 participants (4%) achieved successful ventilation as defined. Overall, participants were more likely to deliver lower pressures and faster rate. Maintaining target positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was least likely to be achieved (19% success), followed by RR (52%), pop-off valve (64%), then peak inspiratory pressure (71%). Nurses were less likely to achieve target pressures compared with all other professions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiprofessional PICU team members have highly variable self-confidence with bag-tube manual ventilation using a flow-inflating bag. Observed performance demonstrates rare success with achieving targeted ventilation parameters, in particular maintenance of PEEP. Future research should focus on developing mobile simulation units to facilitate profession-specific, real-time coaching to teach high-quality manual ventilation that can be translated to the bedside.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003612","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the skill of bag-tube manual ventilation with the flow-inflating bag in multiprofessional PICU team members using a mobile simulation unit.

Design: Prospective observational study from January 2022 to April 2022.

Setting: In situ mobile simulation using the flow-inflating bag in an academic PICU.

Subjects: Multiprofessional PICU team members including nurses, respiratory therapists, nurse practitioners, fellows, and attendings.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We enrolled 129 participants who twice completed 1-minute tasks performing bag-tube manual ventilation with a flow-inflating bag. Sessions were video recorded; four could not be analyzed. Only 30% of participants reported being very to extremely confident, and the majority (62%) reported infrequent skill performance. Task success was defined as achieving target pressure ranges during 80% of the delivered breaths, respiratory rate (RR) of 25-35 breaths/min, and successful pop-off valve engagement. Only five of 129 participants (4%) achieved successful ventilation as defined. Overall, participants were more likely to deliver lower pressures and faster rate. Maintaining target positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was least likely to be achieved (19% success), followed by RR (52%), pop-off valve (64%), then peak inspiratory pressure (71%). Nurses were less likely to achieve target pressures compared with all other professions.

Conclusions: Multiprofessional PICU team members have highly variable self-confidence with bag-tube manual ventilation using a flow-inflating bag. Observed performance demonstrates rare success with achieving targeted ventilation parameters, in particular maintenance of PEEP. Future research should focus on developing mobile simulation units to facilitate profession-specific, real-time coaching to teach high-quality manual ventilation that can be translated to the bedside.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科复苏技能之袋管人工通气:开发和使用移动模拟程序评估 PICU 多专业团队的能力。
目的使用移动模拟装置,评估 PICU 多专业团队成员使用流量充气袋进行袋管手动通气的技能:设计:2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 4 月的前瞻性观察研究:研究对象: PICU多专业团队成员:多专业 PICU 团队成员,包括护士、呼吸治疗师、执业护士、研究员和主治医师:干预措施:无:我们招募了 129 名参与者,他们两次完成了使用充气袋进行袋管手动通气的 1 分钟任务。会议进行了录像,其中四次无法进行分析。只有 30% 的参与者表示非常自信或非常自信,大多数人(62%)表示不经常进行技能操作。任务成功的定义是在 80% 的送气过程中达到目标压力范围,呼吸频率 (RR) 达到 25-35 次/分钟,以及成功打开阀门。在 129 名参与者中,只有 5 人(4%)达到了成功通气的定义。总体而言,参与者更倾向于使用较低的压力和较快的呼吸频率。维持目标呼气末正压 (PEEP) 的成功率最低(19%),其次是呼吸频率(52%)、关闭活瓣(64%),然后是吸气峰压(71%)。与所有其他专业相比,护士达到目标压力的可能性较低:结论:PICU 多专业团队成员对使用充气袋进行袋管手动通气的自信心差异很大。观察结果表明,在达到目标通气参数,尤其是维持 PEEP 方面,成功率很低。未来的研究应侧重于开发移动模拟装置,以促进针对特定专业的实时指导,教授高质量的手动通气,并将其应用到床旁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Antithrombin and Activated Protein C in Pediatric Sepsis: Prospective Observational Study of Outcome. Family Presence at the PICU Bedside and Pediatric Patient Delirium: Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Center Cohort, 2014-2017. Planning a Phased Guideline Implementation Strategy Across the Multicenter Ventilation Liberation for Kids (VentLib4Kids) Collaborative. The Pediatric Influence of Cooling Duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (P-ICECAP): Statistical Methods Planned in the Bayesian, Adaptive, Duration Finding Trial. Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support: Insight From a Cardiovascular Simulator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1