Palliative Care Referral Patterns and Implications for Standardization in Cardiac ICU.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pediatric Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1007/s00246-024-03681-9
Arshia Madni, Jocelyn Matheson, Amanda Linz, Austin Dalgo, Rumana Siddique, Anthony Merlocco
{"title":"Palliative Care Referral Patterns and Implications for Standardization in Cardiac ICU.","authors":"Arshia Madni, Jocelyn Matheson, Amanda Linz, Austin Dalgo, Rumana Siddique, Anthony Merlocco","doi":"10.1007/s00246-024-03681-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence suggests that pediatric palliative care involvement (PPC) is beneficial to medically complex patients. Historically, PPC involvement has been overlooked or delayed and varies by institution but PPC awareness has increased in cardiovascular ICUs (CVICU) and so we investigated frequency and timeliness of PPC referral for patients dying in ICU. Retrospective study of pediatric cardiac patients experiencing death in ICU to review PPC presence and timing of initial PPC, most recent PPC, and interventions, therapies, CPR, and presence of do-not-resuscitate DNR discussion. Fifty-four patients died during a 5-year period aged 11d-17y (54% male). PPC involvement occurred in 40/54 (74%). Of those patients without PPC, the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC) guidelines would have supported PPC in 11/14 (79%). DNR discussion was more likely in PPC patients (63% vs 14%; p = 0.0011), though often only on DOD. Comparing prior to DOD, PPC patients were still more likely to have DNR discussion (55% vs 0%; p = 0.0003). PPC patients were no less likely to have CPR on DOD (28% vs 43%, p = 0.29). PPC occurred frequently in patients experiencing death in CVICU. However, frequently the initial PPC occurred within a week or day of death. Patients without PPC would often qualify under published guidelines. Standardization, timing, and patient identification for PPC will expand efficacy in CVICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-024-03681-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence suggests that pediatric palliative care involvement (PPC) is beneficial to medically complex patients. Historically, PPC involvement has been overlooked or delayed and varies by institution but PPC awareness has increased in cardiovascular ICUs (CVICU) and so we investigated frequency and timeliness of PPC referral for patients dying in ICU. Retrospective study of pediatric cardiac patients experiencing death in ICU to review PPC presence and timing of initial PPC, most recent PPC, and interventions, therapies, CPR, and presence of do-not-resuscitate DNR discussion. Fifty-four patients died during a 5-year period aged 11d-17y (54% male). PPC involvement occurred in 40/54 (74%). Of those patients without PPC, the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC) guidelines would have supported PPC in 11/14 (79%). DNR discussion was more likely in PPC patients (63% vs 14%; p = 0.0011), though often only on DOD. Comparing prior to DOD, PPC patients were still more likely to have DNR discussion (55% vs 0%; p = 0.0003). PPC patients were no less likely to have CPR on DOD (28% vs 43%, p = 0.29). PPC occurred frequently in patients experiencing death in CVICU. However, frequently the initial PPC occurred within a week or day of death. Patients without PPC would often qualify under published guidelines. Standardization, timing, and patient identification for PPC will expand efficacy in CVICU.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏重症监护病房姑息关怀转诊模式及标准化的意义。
有证据表明,儿科姑息关怀(PPC)的参与对病情复杂的患者有益。但心血管重症监护病房(CVICU)对姑息治疗的认识有所提高,因此我们对重症监护病房死亡患者姑息治疗转诊的频率和及时性进行了调查。我们对在重症监护室中死亡的儿科心脏病患者进行了回顾性研究,以审查是否存在 PPC 以及初始 PPC 的时间、最近的 PPC、干预措施、疗法、心肺复苏术和是否进行了拒绝复苏 DNR 讨论。在 5 年的时间里,有 54 名患者死亡,年龄在 11d-17y 之间(54% 为男性)。其中 40/54 例(74%)发生了全身多器官功能障碍。在没有参与姑息治疗的患者中,根据姑息治疗推进中心 (CAPC) 指南,11/14(79%)的患者会支持姑息治疗。PPC患者更有可能讨论DNR(63% vs 14%; p = 0.0011),但通常只在DOD时讨论。与 DOD 之前相比,PPC 患者仍更有可能进行 DNR 讨论(55% vs 0%;p = 0.0003)。PPC患者在DOD时进行心肺复苏的可能性也不低(28% vs 43%,p = 0.29)。在 CVICU 死亡的患者中,PPC 发生率很高。然而,最初的 PPC 经常发生在死亡后一周或一天内。根据已发布的指南,没有 PPC 的患者通常符合条件。PPC的标准化、时机和患者识别将扩大CVICU的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Cardiology
Pediatric Cardiology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Four-Dimensional Flow MRI, Two-Dimensional Phase-Contrast MRI and Echocardiography in Transposition of the Great Arteries. A Challenging Interventional Procedure: Transcatheter Closure of Tubular Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension. Impact of Residual Lesion Severity on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Following Congenital Heart Surgery in Infancy and Childhood. Risk Stratification in Pediatric Wolff-Parkinson-White: Practice Variation Among Pediatric Cardiologists and Electrophysiologists. Outcomes of Infant Supraventricular Tachycardia Management Without Medication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1