The implementation of molecular tumor profiling in the practice of pediatric cancer pathology: The pathologists' experience.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pediatric Blood & Cancer Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1002/pbc.31370
Catherine K Gestrich, Portia Kreiger, Lea Surrey, Sherri Besmer, Dolores Lopez-Terrada, Alanna J Church
{"title":"The implementation of molecular tumor profiling in the practice of pediatric cancer pathology: The pathologists' experience.","authors":"Catherine K Gestrich, Portia Kreiger, Lea Surrey, Sherri Besmer, Dolores Lopez-Terrada, Alanna J Church","doi":"10.1002/pbc.31370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increased accessibility and utilization of molecular testing including next-generation sequencing (NGS) has impacted the practice of pediatric pathology, with diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications for our patients. This survey is the first to describe the utilization of molecular testing in the routine practice of pediatric pathology for the care of children with known or suspected solid tumors.</p><p><strong>Procedure: </strong>The Society for Pediatric Pathology Practice Committee distributed a survey to our membership asking 25 questions about training, practice setting, molecular ordering practices, and barriers to testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five pathologists responded to the survey. The survey provides valuable insight into the current use of molecular testing for the care of children with known or suspected solid tumors. Most respondents reported that they are increasingly using a variety of molecular techniques, with increased use over time, and that NGS is useful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results highlight a variety of barriers to molecular testing, including cost, insurance coverage, turnaround time, limitations of available assays (including limited coverage of pediatric-specific alterations), and difficulty in determining the most appropriate test to order. These data may be useful in supporting pediatric pathologists in their practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19822,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"e31370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.31370","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increased accessibility and utilization of molecular testing including next-generation sequencing (NGS) has impacted the practice of pediatric pathology, with diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications for our patients. This survey is the first to describe the utilization of molecular testing in the routine practice of pediatric pathology for the care of children with known or suspected solid tumors.

Procedure: The Society for Pediatric Pathology Practice Committee distributed a survey to our membership asking 25 questions about training, practice setting, molecular ordering practices, and barriers to testing.

Results: Seventy-five pathologists responded to the survey. The survey provides valuable insight into the current use of molecular testing for the care of children with known or suspected solid tumors. Most respondents reported that they are increasingly using a variety of molecular techniques, with increased use over time, and that NGS is useful.

Conclusions: These results highlight a variety of barriers to molecular testing, including cost, insurance coverage, turnaround time, limitations of available assays (including limited coverage of pediatric-specific alterations), and difficulty in determining the most appropriate test to order. These data may be useful in supporting pediatric pathologists in their practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿科癌症病理学实践中实施肿瘤分子图谱分析:病理学家的经验。
背景:分子检测(包括下一代测序(NGS))的可及性和利用率的提高影响了儿科病理学的实践,对我们的患者产生了诊断、预后和治疗方面的影响。本调查首次描述了分子检测在儿科病理学常规实践中对已知或疑似实体瘤患儿治疗的应用情况:程序:儿科病理学会实践委员会向会员发放了一份调查问卷,就培训、实践环境、分子排序实践和检测障碍等方面提出了25个问题:75名病理学家对调查做出了回复。该调查为了解目前在治疗已知或疑似实体瘤患儿时分子检测的使用情况提供了宝贵的信息。大多数受访者表示,他们正在越来越多地使用各种分子技术,而且随着时间的推移使用量也在增加,NGS 也很有用:这些结果突显了分子检测的各种障碍,包括成本、保险范围、周转时间、现有检测方法的局限性(包括对儿科特异性改变的覆盖有限)以及难以确定最合适的检测方法。这些数据可能有助于支持儿科病理学家的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Pediatric Blood & Cancer 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Pediatric Blood & Cancer publishes the highest quality manuscripts describing basic and clinical investigations of blood disorders and malignant diseases of childhood including diagnosis, treatment, epidemiology, etiology, biology, and molecular and clinical genetics of these diseases as they affect children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatric Blood & Cancer will also include studies on such treatment options as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, immunology, and gene therapy.
期刊最新文献
Hypoalbuminemia and Nutritional Status in Children with Cancer. Systemic Inflammatory Response Post Alemtuzumab and Low-Dose Total Body Irradiation in Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease: A Case Series. Implications of Implementing Children's Oncology Group Risk Stratification to Patients With Rhabdomyosarcoma Treated on European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group Clinical Trial. A Rare t(X;21)(p11;q22) in Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Case Report and Literature Review. Centralized Investigator Review of Radiological and Functional Imaging Reports in Real-World Oncology Studies: The SACHA-France Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1