[Prevention of vascular surgical site infections in the groin with negative pressure wound therapy].

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Orvosi hetilap Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI:10.1556/650.2024.33142
Dorottya Szabó, Szamanta Turi, Gergely Vadász, Melinda Gadácsi, Gábor Fazekas, Szaniszló Jávor, Gábor Kasza, Gábor Jancsó, László Benkő
{"title":"[Prevention of vascular surgical site infections in the groin with negative pressure wound therapy].","authors":"Dorottya Szabó, Szamanta Turi, Gergely Vadász, Melinda Gadácsi, Gábor Fazekas, Szaniszló Jávor, Gábor Kasza, Gábor Jancsó, László Benkő","doi":"10.1556/650.2024.33142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction: The role of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic, difficult-to-heal, infected wounds is becoming increasingly significant. The site most susceptible to infection following vascular surgery is the longitudinal incision wound in the groin. The following factors are predisposing factors for the development of wound infection: diabetes, obesity, previous surgery in the region, lower limb gangrene and ulcers. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether closed incision negative pressure wound therapy reduces the incidence of surgical site infections and wound healing disorders in high-risk patients and whether closed incision negative pressure wound therapy reduces septic graft formation. Method: A total of 38 patients who met at least one of the inclusion criteria (body mass index >30, previous surgery in the same region, wound necrosis) were included in the study. The control group (n = 19) was treated with conventional wound coverage (Cosmopor E). In the closed incision negative pressure wound therapy group (n = 19), the primarily closed wound was covered with polyvinyl alcohol foam (VivanoMed White Foam) intraoperatively, then sealed with an airtight foil. Once the port of the vacuum machine had been connected, wound suction was initiated immediately (continuous suction, 100 mmHg). The duration of treatment was 7 days. Patients were followed up postoperatively at 10, 30, and 60 days. Results: In the control group, 42.1% of patients (n = 8) developed wound healing defects, and 36.8% (n = 7) developed surgical site infection. One patient underwent reoperation for septic graft formation. In the closed incision negative pressure wound therapy group, 31.6% (n = 6) of the patients developed wound healing problem, and 26.3% (n = 5) developed infection; in one case reoperation was performed due to septic graft formation. Conclusion: Regarding the primary endpoint, no notable discrepancies were observed between the examined groups. The results of this study demonstrate that closed incision negative pressure wound therapy may be advantageous over conventional wound care in obese patients and in those who have undergone previous inguinal surgery. A potential avenue for further investigation would be to implement more rigorous inclusion criteria. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(42): 1652–1658.</p>","PeriodicalId":19911,"journal":{"name":"Orvosi hetilap","volume":"165 42","pages":"1652-1658"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orvosi hetilap","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2024.33142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The role of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic, difficult-to-heal, infected wounds is becoming increasingly significant. The site most susceptible to infection following vascular surgery is the longitudinal incision wound in the groin. The following factors are predisposing factors for the development of wound infection: diabetes, obesity, previous surgery in the region, lower limb gangrene and ulcers. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether closed incision negative pressure wound therapy reduces the incidence of surgical site infections and wound healing disorders in high-risk patients and whether closed incision negative pressure wound therapy reduces septic graft formation. Method: A total of 38 patients who met at least one of the inclusion criteria (body mass index >30, previous surgery in the same region, wound necrosis) were included in the study. The control group (n = 19) was treated with conventional wound coverage (Cosmopor E). In the closed incision negative pressure wound therapy group (n = 19), the primarily closed wound was covered with polyvinyl alcohol foam (VivanoMed White Foam) intraoperatively, then sealed with an airtight foil. Once the port of the vacuum machine had been connected, wound suction was initiated immediately (continuous suction, 100 mmHg). The duration of treatment was 7 days. Patients were followed up postoperatively at 10, 30, and 60 days. Results: In the control group, 42.1% of patients (n = 8) developed wound healing defects, and 36.8% (n = 7) developed surgical site infection. One patient underwent reoperation for septic graft formation. In the closed incision negative pressure wound therapy group, 31.6% (n = 6) of the patients developed wound healing problem, and 26.3% (n = 5) developed infection; in one case reoperation was performed due to septic graft formation. Conclusion: Regarding the primary endpoint, no notable discrepancies were observed between the examined groups. The results of this study demonstrate that closed incision negative pressure wound therapy may be advantageous over conventional wound care in obese patients and in those who have undergone previous inguinal surgery. A potential avenue for further investigation would be to implement more rigorous inclusion criteria. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(42): 1652–1658.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[用负压伤口疗法预防腹股沟血管手术部位感染]。
负压创面治疗在治疗慢性、难愈合、感染创面中的作用越来越重要。血管手术后最容易感染的部位是腹股沟纵切口。以下因素是伤口感染发生的易感因素:糖尿病、肥胖、该区域以前的手术、下肢坏疽和溃疡。目的:本研究的目的是探讨闭合切口负压创面治疗是否能降低高危患者手术部位感染和创面愈合障碍的发生率,以及闭合切口负压创面治疗是否能减少脓毒性移植物的形成。方法:38例患者符合至少一项纳入标准(体重指数bbb30,既往同一部位手术,创面坏死)。对照组(n = 19)采用常规创面覆盖(Cosmopor E)。闭合切口负压创面治疗组(19例),术中先用聚乙烯醇泡沫(VivanoMed White foam)覆盖初次闭合创面,再用密封箔封住创面。一旦连接上真空机的端口,立即启动伤口吸痰(持续吸痰,100mmhg)。治疗时间为7 d。术后随访时间分别为10、30、60天。结果:对照组患者创面愈合缺损发生率为42.1% (n = 8),手术部位感染发生率为36.8% (n = 7)。1例患者因脓毒性移植物形成再次手术。在闭合切口负压创面治疗组,31.6% (n = 6)患者出现创面愈合问题,26.3% (n = 5)患者出现感染;1例因脓毒性移植物形成再次手术。结论:在主要终点方面,各组间无显著差异。本研究结果表明,对于肥胖患者和既往腹股沟手术患者,封闭切口负压伤口治疗可能优于传统伤口护理。进一步调查的可能途径是实施更严格的纳入标准。奥夫·海泰尔。2024;165(42): 1652 - 1658。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orvosi hetilap
Orvosi hetilap MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
274
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original and review papers in the fields of experimental and clinical medicine. It covers epidemiology, diagnostics, therapy and the prevention of human diseases as well as papers of medical history. Orvosi Hetilap is the oldest, still in-print, Hungarian publication and also the one-and-only weekly published scientific journal in Hungary. The strategy of the journal is based on the Curatorium of the Lajos Markusovszky Foundation and on the National and International Editorial Board. The 150 year-old journal is part of the Hungarian Cultural Heritage.
期刊最新文献
[Determination of albuminuria in the light of the first-line pharmacotherapy of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction]. [Is early childhood screen exposure harmful to children's mental health?] [Potential complications and management of hyaluronic acid fillers in facial aesthetics]. [Physician, painter, soldier: Georges Chicotot (1855-1937)]. [What should we eat, and why?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1