METHA-NeP: effectiveness and safety of methadone for neuropathic pain: a controlled randomized trial.

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY PAIN® Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003413
Jorge Alberto Martins Pentiado Júnior, Marcell Maduro Barbosa, Gabriel Taricani Kubota, Pedro Nascimento Martins, Larissa Iulle Moreira, Ana Mércia Fernandes, Valquíria Aparecida da Silva, Jefferson Rosi Júnior, Lin Tchia Yeng, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Daniel Ciampi de Andrade
{"title":"METHA-NeP: effectiveness and safety of methadone for neuropathic pain: a controlled randomized trial.","authors":"Jorge Alberto Martins Pentiado Júnior, Marcell Maduro Barbosa, Gabriel Taricani Kubota, Pedro Nascimento Martins, Larissa Iulle Moreira, Ana Mércia Fernandes, Valquíria Aparecida da Silva, Jefferson Rosi Júnior, Lin Tchia Yeng, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Daniel Ciampi de Andrade","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind, parallel placebo-controlled clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of methadone as an add-on therapy for people with chronic neuropathic pain (NP). Eighty-six patients were randomly assigned to receive methadone or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving at least 30% pain relief from baseline using a 100-mm pain Visual Analogue Scale. Secondary outcomes included global impression of change, NP symptoms, sleep quality, quality of life, pain interference in daily activities, and mood. A larger number of responders were found in the methadone (68%), compared to the placebo (33%) arm; risk difference 33.6%; 95% confidence interval 13.0%-54.3%; P = 0.003; number needed to treat = 3.0. Methadone reduced pain intensity ( P < 0.001), burning ( P = 0.023), pressing ( P = 0.005), and paroxysmal dimensions ( P = 0.006) of NP. Methadone also improved sleep ( P < 0.001) and increased the patient's global impression of improvement ( P = 0.002). Methadone did not significantly impact quality of life, pain interference, or mood. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in all methadone- and in 73% of placebo-treated patients ( P < 0.001). No serious adverse events or deaths occurred. Discontinuation due to adverse events was reported in 2 participants in the methadone and none in the placebo arm. Methadone use as an add-on to an optimized treatment for NP with first- and/or second-line drugs provided superior analgesia, improved sleep, and enhanced global impression of change, without being associated with significant serious adverse effects that would raise safety concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"557-570"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003413","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel placebo-controlled clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of methadone as an add-on therapy for people with chronic neuropathic pain (NP). Eighty-six patients were randomly assigned to receive methadone or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving at least 30% pain relief from baseline using a 100-mm pain Visual Analogue Scale. Secondary outcomes included global impression of change, NP symptoms, sleep quality, quality of life, pain interference in daily activities, and mood. A larger number of responders were found in the methadone (68%), compared to the placebo (33%) arm; risk difference 33.6%; 95% confidence interval 13.0%-54.3%; P = 0.003; number needed to treat = 3.0. Methadone reduced pain intensity ( P < 0.001), burning ( P = 0.023), pressing ( P = 0.005), and paroxysmal dimensions ( P = 0.006) of NP. Methadone also improved sleep ( P < 0.001) and increased the patient's global impression of improvement ( P = 0.002). Methadone did not significantly impact quality of life, pain interference, or mood. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in all methadone- and in 73% of placebo-treated patients ( P < 0.001). No serious adverse events or deaths occurred. Discontinuation due to adverse events was reported in 2 participants in the methadone and none in the placebo arm. Methadone use as an add-on to an optimized treatment for NP with first- and/or second-line drugs provided superior analgesia, improved sleep, and enhanced global impression of change, without being associated with significant serious adverse effects that would raise safety concerns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
METHA-NeP:美沙酮治疗神经性疼痛的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验。
摘要:在这项随机、双盲、平行安慰剂对照临床试验中,我们评估了美沙酮作为慢性神经性疼痛(NP)患者附加疗法的疗效。86 名患者被随机分配接受美沙酮或安慰剂治疗,为期 8 周。主要结果是使用 100 毫米疼痛视觉模拟量表,疼痛较基线缓解至少 30% 的参与者比例。次要结果包括总体变化印象、NP 症状、睡眠质量、生活质量、疼痛对日常活动的干扰以及情绪。与安慰剂组(33%)相比,美沙酮组(68%)的应答者更多,风险差异为 33.6%;95% 置信区间为 13.0%-54.3%;P = 0.003;治疗所需人数 = 3.0。美沙酮可降低 NP 的疼痛强度(P < 0.001)、烧灼感(P = 0.023)、压迫感(P = 0.005)和阵发性程度(P = 0.006)。美沙酮还能改善睡眠(P < 0.001),增加患者对病情改善的总体印象(P = 0.002)。美沙酮对生活质量、疼痛干扰或情绪没有明显影响。所有接受美沙酮治疗的患者和73%接受安慰剂治疗的患者都发生了治疗突发不良事件(P < 0.001)。没有发生严重不良事件或死亡。美沙酮治疗组有 2 名患者因不良反应而停药,安慰剂治疗组无患者因不良反应而停药。美沙酮作为使用一线和/或二线药物对非典型肺炎进行优化治疗的附加疗法,可提供更佳的镇痛效果、改善睡眠和增强总体变化印象,且不会产生引起安全问题的严重不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
期刊最新文献
Which moderating factors influence autonomic imbalance in chronic musculoskeletal pain? A domain-specific systematic review and multilevel meta-regression of heart rate variability. Unpredictable sound stress induces a novel form of hyperalgesic priming. Leprosy-related pain: updates and why it matters. Hypnosis in chronic pain: from new hope to emerging standard? Cross-lagged longitudinal analysis of pain and fear of cancer recurrence in young female survivors of breast and gynaecological cancers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1