Diagnostic accuracy of low dose CT-Scan abdomen in patients with clinical features of acute appendicitis.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.12669/pjms.40.9.9862
Syed Jehanzeb Asim, Zubia Masood, Erum Soomro, Abdul Sami Qureshi
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of low dose CT-Scan abdomen in patients with clinical features of acute appendicitis.","authors":"Syed Jehanzeb Asim, Zubia Masood, Erum Soomro, Abdul Sami Qureshi","doi":"10.12669/pjms.40.9.9862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objective: </strong>Acute appendicitis is one of the commonest causes of acute abdominal pain presenting to emergency department (ED) and Computerized Tomography scan (CT) is considered gold standard for its diagnosis. Internationally Low Dose Computerized Tomography scan (LDCT) in emergency department is recommended as a beneficial tool to diagnose acute appendicitis with less exposure to radiation and reduction in the rate of negative laparotomy. Local trials are needed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LDCT as the first line imaging test for acute appendicitis. Our objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LDCT as the first line imaging test for acute appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study was conducted over a sample of 147 patients presented with suspected acute appendicitis to the emergency department of Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi from November 2018 till May 2019. Non-probability consecutive technique used. Aged ≥ 16 years presented in emergency department with the history (symptoms) and physical examination (Signs) suspecting acute appendicitis were included. Patients with contraindications to CT scan e.g. pregnant women. Patients with signs of Acute Peritonitis requiring immediate surgery. CT scan refused by the patient or patient's attendant were excluded. Histopathology was the gold standard in diagnosing acute appendicitis. The data was analyzed using open epi sample size calculator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty six patients had positive findings on LDCT for acute appendicitis (99.3%) whereas only one patient had negative findings (0.7%). The sensitivity and specificity of LDCT for the detection of acute appendicitis were estimated as 96.45% and 16.67% by taking histopathology as gold standard. Negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were estimated as 16.67% and 96.45% respectively. The overall accuracy of LDCT was 93.88%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that for diagnosing acute appendicitis, LDCT is harmless, fast and economical imaging modality and has diagnostic accuracy with decrease in radiation dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.9.9862","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objective: Acute appendicitis is one of the commonest causes of acute abdominal pain presenting to emergency department (ED) and Computerized Tomography scan (CT) is considered gold standard for its diagnosis. Internationally Low Dose Computerized Tomography scan (LDCT) in emergency department is recommended as a beneficial tool to diagnose acute appendicitis with less exposure to radiation and reduction in the rate of negative laparotomy. Local trials are needed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LDCT as the first line imaging test for acute appendicitis. Our objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LDCT as the first line imaging test for acute appendicitis.

Methods: An observational study was conducted over a sample of 147 patients presented with suspected acute appendicitis to the emergency department of Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi from November 2018 till May 2019. Non-probability consecutive technique used. Aged ≥ 16 years presented in emergency department with the history (symptoms) and physical examination (Signs) suspecting acute appendicitis were included. Patients with contraindications to CT scan e.g. pregnant women. Patients with signs of Acute Peritonitis requiring immediate surgery. CT scan refused by the patient or patient's attendant were excluded. Histopathology was the gold standard in diagnosing acute appendicitis. The data was analyzed using open epi sample size calculator.

Results: One hundred forty six patients had positive findings on LDCT for acute appendicitis (99.3%) whereas only one patient had negative findings (0.7%). The sensitivity and specificity of LDCT for the detection of acute appendicitis were estimated as 96.45% and 16.67% by taking histopathology as gold standard. Negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were estimated as 16.67% and 96.45% respectively. The overall accuracy of LDCT was 93.88%.

Conclusion: Our study showed that for diagnosing acute appendicitis, LDCT is harmless, fast and economical imaging modality and has diagnostic accuracy with decrease in radiation dose.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低剂量腹部 CT 扫描对具有急性阑尾炎临床特征的患者的诊断准确性。
背景与目的:急性阑尾炎是急诊科(ED)最常见的急性腹痛病因之一,计算机断层扫描(CT)被认为是诊断急性阑尾炎的金标准。国际上推荐在急诊科使用低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)作为诊断急性阑尾炎的有利工具,可减少辐射暴露,降低开腹手术的阴性率。需要在当地进行试验,以确定 LDCT 作为急性阑尾炎一线成像检查的诊断准确性。我们的目标是确定 LDCT 作为急性阑尾炎一线成像检查的诊断准确性:从 2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 5 月,我们在卡拉奇齐亚乌丁大学医院急诊科对 147 名疑似急性阑尾炎患者进行了抽样观察研究。采用非概率连续技术。年龄≥16岁、病史(症状)和体格检查(体征)均怀疑患有急性阑尾炎的急诊患者均被纳入其中。有 CT 扫描禁忌症的患者,如孕妇。有急性腹膜炎体征并需要立即手术的患者。病人或病人的护理人员拒绝 CT 扫描的病人除外。组织病理学是诊断急性阑尾炎的金标准。数据使用开放式 epi 样本量计算器进行分析:结果:146 名急性阑尾炎患者的 LDCT 检查结果呈阳性(99.3%),只有一名患者呈阴性(0.7%)。以组织病理学为金标准,LDCT 检测急性阑尾炎的敏感性和特异性分别为 96.45% 和 16.67%。阴性预测值(NPV)和阳性预测值(PPV)分别为 16.67% 和 96.45%。LDCT的总体准确率为93.88%:我们的研究表明,在诊断急性阑尾炎时,LDCT 是一种无害、快速、经济的成像方式,并且在降低辐射剂量的同时还具有诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Clinical Practice Guidelines on Palliative Sedation Around the World: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1