Is Anxiety related to oral examination scores of Anatomy and Physiology? A study of pre-clinical MBBS and BDS Students.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.12669/pjms.40.9.8544
Ambreen Surti, Ambreen Usmani, Muhammad Raza Sarfraz, Shazia Shakoor
{"title":"Is Anxiety related to oral examination scores of Anatomy and Physiology? A study of pre-clinical MBBS and BDS Students.","authors":"Ambreen Surti, Ambreen Usmani, Muhammad Raza Sarfraz, Shazia Shakoor","doi":"10.12669/pjms.40.9.8544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess anxiety levels among 1<sup>st</sup> and 2<sup>nd</sup> year MBBS and 1<sup>st</sup> year BDS students in oral examinations of anatomy and physiology and to compare the anxiety scores among students of 1<sup>st</sup> and 2<sup>nd</sup> year MBBS and 1<sup>st</sup> year BDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 231 undergraduate (MBBS and BDS) students of University from Karachi durning December 2022 to May 2023. Westside anxiety scale was used to assess anxiety levels in students and the scores were compared with oral examination scores using One-way analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extremely high levels of anxiety was noted in relation to oral examination of Anatomy with a mean score of 25±3.801 while a mean of 30.00±5.170 was noted in Physiology in BDS students. However, significant results were observed on comparing Anatomy and Physiology oral examination scores among 1<sup>st</sup> and 2<sup>nd</sup> year students.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary higher levels of test anxiety, especially for oral examinations was observed in MBBS students as compared to BDS students. It was also observed that anxiety levels were much higher for Anatomy oral examinations as compared to those for Physiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":19958,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"40 9","pages":"2011-2016"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.9.8544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess anxiety levels among 1st and 2nd year MBBS and 1st year BDS students in oral examinations of anatomy and physiology and to compare the anxiety scores among students of 1st and 2nd year MBBS and 1st year BDS.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 231 undergraduate (MBBS and BDS) students of University from Karachi durning December 2022 to May 2023. Westside anxiety scale was used to assess anxiety levels in students and the scores were compared with oral examination scores using One-way analysis of variance.

Results: Extremely high levels of anxiety was noted in relation to oral examination of Anatomy with a mean score of 25±3.801 while a mean of 30.00±5.170 was noted in Physiology in BDS students. However, significant results were observed on comparing Anatomy and Physiology oral examination scores among 1st and 2nd year students.

Conclusion: In summary higher levels of test anxiety, especially for oral examinations was observed in MBBS students as compared to BDS students. It was also observed that anxiety levels were much higher for Anatomy oral examinations as compared to those for Physiology.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
焦虑与解剖学和生理学口试成绩有关吗?对临床前 MBBS 和 BDS 学生的研究。
目的评估医学学士(MBBS)一年级、二年级和医学博士(BDS)一年级学生在解剖学和生理学口试中的焦虑水平,并比较医学学士(MBBS)一年级、二年级和医学博士(BDS)一年级学生的焦虑得分:这项横断面研究的对象是卡拉奇大学的 231 名本科生(MBBS 和 BDS),时间为 2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 5 月。采用韦斯特赛德焦虑量表评估学生的焦虑水平,并通过单因素方差分析将得分与口试得分进行比较:结果:解剖学口试的学生焦虑程度极高,平均得分为 25±3.801,而生理学口试的学生焦虑程度平均为 30.00±5.170。然而,在比较一年级和二年级学生的解剖学和生理学口试成绩时,观察到了明显的结果:总之,与医学博士学生相比,医学学士学生的考试焦虑程度较高,尤其是口试。此外,还观察到解剖学口试的焦虑程度远高于生理学口试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It is a peer reviewed medical journal published regularly since 1984. It was previously known as quarterly "SPECIALIST" till December 31st 1999. It publishes original research articles, review articles, current practices, short communications & case reports. It attracts manuscripts not only from within Pakistan but also from over fifty countries from abroad. Copies of PJMS are sent to all the import medical libraries all over Pakistan and overseas particularly in South East Asia and Asia Pacific besides WHO EMRO Region countries. Eminent members of the medical profession at home and abroad regularly contribute their write-ups, manuscripts in our publications. We pursue an independent editorial policy, which allows an opportunity to the healthcare professionals to express their views without any fear or favour. That is why many opinion makers among the medical and pharmaceutical profession use this publication to communicate their viewpoint.
期刊最新文献
Frequency of Acute Stress Disorder (ASD) and Postnatal Depression in Mothers Of Preterm Neonates Hospitalized in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Pakistan. Effects of infant touch on the growth and neurodevelopment of preterm infants. Expression of lipid metabolism-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma and their prognostic significance. Feedback literacy among undergraduate dental students: A cross-sectional study across two institutions. Efficacy and safety of sintilimab in the treatment of sqNSCLC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1