Hashim M Bin Salleeh, Syed Amir Ahmad, Tahani Al Ahmadi, Uzma Y Kashif, Israa Y Bamogaddam, Lama H AlFakhri, Abdullah F AlSaeed
{"title":"Short-term Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Administration in the Pediatric Emergency Department: Feasibility, Safety, and Outcome.","authors":"Hashim M Bin Salleeh, Syed Amir Ahmad, Tahani Al Ahmadi, Uzma Y Kashif, Israa Y Bamogaddam, Lama H AlFakhri, Abdullah F AlSaeed","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The practice of administration of intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy in outpatient settings (OPAT) is a low-cost alternative to in-patient admission and treatment. There is, however, limited evidence supporting OPAT management protocols for children. The primary objective of this study was to describe the use of pediatric emergency-based OPAT, as well as the safety of this practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a prospective, observational study conducted in pediatric emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. Children younger than 14 years who required pediatric emergency department-based OPAT were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and ninety-two children were included in the study. The mean duration of OPAT was 3.5 days. Ceftriaxone was the most frequently used antimicrobial. Chest infection was the commonest indication, followed by sickle cell disease with fever and soft tissue infections. There were no major intravenous line-related complications over course of treatment. Most of the patients (89.5%) completed the OPAT course successfully. Only 10.4% patients required subsequent hospital admission, with failure to improve on the OPAT protocol being the main reason patients for admission. None of the admitted patients required intensive care settings or faced unexpected morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results affirm that pediatric emergency-based OPAT is a safe yet effective practice in children with good clinical outcome. We believe that a reduction in admissions translates to better hospital resource utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"866-870"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The practice of administration of intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy in outpatient settings (OPAT) is a low-cost alternative to in-patient admission and treatment. There is, however, limited evidence supporting OPAT management protocols for children. The primary objective of this study was to describe the use of pediatric emergency-based OPAT, as well as the safety of this practice.
Methods: The study was a prospective, observational study conducted in pediatric emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. Children younger than 14 years who required pediatric emergency department-based OPAT were included in the study.
Results: Three hundred and ninety-two children were included in the study. The mean duration of OPAT was 3.5 days. Ceftriaxone was the most frequently used antimicrobial. Chest infection was the commonest indication, followed by sickle cell disease with fever and soft tissue infections. There were no major intravenous line-related complications over course of treatment. Most of the patients (89.5%) completed the OPAT course successfully. Only 10.4% patients required subsequent hospital admission, with failure to improve on the OPAT protocol being the main reason patients for admission. None of the admitted patients required intensive care settings or faced unexpected morbidity.
Conclusions: Our results affirm that pediatric emergency-based OPAT is a safe yet effective practice in children with good clinical outcome. We believe that a reduction in admissions translates to better hospital resource utilization.
目的:在门诊环境中实施静脉注射抗菌治疗(OPAT)是一种低成本的住院治疗替代方法。然而,支持儿童 OPAT 管理方案的证据却很有限。本研究的主要目的是描述儿科急诊 OPAT 的使用情况以及这种做法的安全性:本研究是一项前瞻性观察研究,在一家三级医院的儿科急诊室进行。研究对象包括需要使用儿科急诊 OPAT 的 14 岁以下儿童:研究共纳入 392 名儿童。OPAT 的平均持续时间为 3.5 天。头孢曲松是最常用的抗菌药物。胸部感染是最常见的适应症,其次是镰状细胞病伴发热和软组织感染。在治疗过程中,没有出现与静脉注射管相关的重大并发症。大多数患者(89.5%)都顺利完成了 OPAT 疗程。只有 10.4% 的患者随后需要入院,入院的主要原因是 OPAT 治疗方案未见好转。没有一名入院患者需要接受重症监护或面临意外发病:我们的研究结果证实,以儿科急诊为基础的 OPAT 是一种安全而有效的儿童治疗方法,临床效果良好。我们相信,入院人数的减少能更好地利用医院资源。
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.