Arterial to jugular-bulb lactate difference in patients undergoing elective brain tumor craniotomy.

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Physiological Reports Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.14814/phy2.70084
Alexandra Vassilieva, Markus Harboe Olsen, Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen, Kirsten Møller, Martin Kryspin Sørensen
{"title":"Arterial to jugular-bulb lactate difference in patients undergoing elective brain tumor craniotomy.","authors":"Alexandra Vassilieva, Markus Harboe Olsen, Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen, Kirsten Møller, Martin Kryspin Sørensen","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hyperlactatemia is common during tumor craniotomy, but the underlying pathophysiology is unclear. This study measured simultaneous arterial and jugular-bulb lactate concentrations in patients undergoing brain tumor craniotomy to investigate the hypothesis that hyperlactatemia was associated with a net cerebrovascular lactate input. In 20 patients, arterial and jugular-bulb blood was collected hourly from the start of surgery to 6 h postoperatively for measurement of lactate, glucose, and oxygen concentration. For each marker, data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with jugular-bulb concentration as dependent variable, arterial concentration as fixed effect, and patient as random effect. Furthermore, we generated regression lines between arterial and jugular-bulb concentrations. The slope of the regression line between arterial and jugular-bulb lactate was 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.98), indicating that increasing arterial lactate levels were associated with an increasingly positive net cerebrovascular balance (net input). The line crossed the identity line at 2.86 (95% CI 0.57-5.16) mmol/L, indicating that lower levels of lactate were associated with a negative net cerebrovascular balance (net output). This suggests a switch from net lactate output during normolactatemia towards net input during hyperlactatemia. Hyperlactatemia in tumor-craniotomy patients probably does not originate from the brain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hyperlactatemia is common during tumor craniotomy, but the underlying pathophysiology is unclear. This study measured simultaneous arterial and jugular-bulb lactate concentrations in patients undergoing brain tumor craniotomy to investigate the hypothesis that hyperlactatemia was associated with a net cerebrovascular lactate input. In 20 patients, arterial and jugular-bulb blood was collected hourly from the start of surgery to 6 h postoperatively for measurement of lactate, glucose, and oxygen concentration. For each marker, data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with jugular-bulb concentration as dependent variable, arterial concentration as fixed effect, and patient as random effect. Furthermore, we generated regression lines between arterial and jugular-bulb concentrations. The slope of the regression line between arterial and jugular-bulb lactate was 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97, R2 = 0.98), indicating that increasing arterial lactate levels were associated with an increasingly positive net cerebrovascular balance (net input). The line crossed the identity line at 2.86 (95% CI 0.57-5.16) mmol/L, indicating that lower levels of lactate were associated with a negative net cerebrovascular balance (net output). This suggests a switch from net lactate output during normolactatemia towards net input during hyperlactatemia. Hyperlactatemia in tumor-craniotomy patients probably does not originate from the brain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性脑肿瘤开颅手术患者动脉与颈静脉球部乳酸的差异。
高乳酸血症在肿瘤开颅手术中很常见,但其潜在的病理生理学尚不清楚。本研究同时测量了脑肿瘤开颅手术患者的动脉和颈静脉乳酸浓度,以研究高乳酸血症与脑血管乳酸净输入有关的假设。从手术开始到术后 6 小时,每小时采集 20 名患者的动脉血和颈静脉血,测量乳酸、葡萄糖和氧气浓度。对于每种标记物,我们都使用线性混合效应模型对数据进行分析,该模型以颈静脉壁浓度为因变量,动脉浓度为固定效应,患者为随机效应。此外,我们还生成了动脉和颈静脉球部浓度之间的回归线。动脉和颈部乳酸浓度之间的回归线斜率为 0.95(95% CI 0.93-0.97,R2 = 0.98),这表明动脉乳酸浓度的增加与脑血管净平衡(净输入)越来越正相关。这条线在 2.86 (95% CI 0.57-5.16) mmol/L 时与特征线交叉,表明较低的乳酸水平与负的脑血管净平衡(净输出)有关。这表明,正常乳酸血症时的乳酸净输出转为高乳酸血症时的净输入。肿瘤-开颅手术患者的高乳酸血症可能并非源于大脑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of occupational exposure: A study on cardiovascular autonomic functions of male gas station attendants in Sri Lanka. Physiologists as medical scientists: An early warning from the German academic system. Examining the effect of salbutamol use in ozone air pollution by people with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Reverse epidemiology of obesity paradox: Fact or fiction? Spinal pain prevalence and associated determinants: A population-based study using the National Survey for Wales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1