Arterial to jugular-bulb lactate difference in patients undergoing elective brain tumor craniotomy.

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Physiological Reports Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.14814/phy2.70084
Alexandra Vassilieva, Markus Harboe Olsen, Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen, Kirsten Møller, Martin Kryspin Sørensen
{"title":"Arterial to jugular-bulb lactate difference in patients undergoing elective brain tumor craniotomy.","authors":"Alexandra Vassilieva, Markus Harboe Olsen, Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen, Kirsten Møller, Martin Kryspin Sørensen","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hyperlactatemia is common during tumor craniotomy, but the underlying pathophysiology is unclear. This study measured simultaneous arterial and jugular-bulb lactate concentrations in patients undergoing brain tumor craniotomy to investigate the hypothesis that hyperlactatemia was associated with a net cerebrovascular lactate input. In 20 patients, arterial and jugular-bulb blood was collected hourly from the start of surgery to 6 h postoperatively for measurement of lactate, glucose, and oxygen concentration. For each marker, data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with jugular-bulb concentration as dependent variable, arterial concentration as fixed effect, and patient as random effect. Furthermore, we generated regression lines between arterial and jugular-bulb concentrations. The slope of the regression line between arterial and jugular-bulb lactate was 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.98), indicating that increasing arterial lactate levels were associated with an increasingly positive net cerebrovascular balance (net input). The line crossed the identity line at 2.86 (95% CI 0.57-5.16) mmol/L, indicating that lower levels of lactate were associated with a negative net cerebrovascular balance (net output). This suggests a switch from net lactate output during normolactatemia towards net input during hyperlactatemia. Hyperlactatemia in tumor-craniotomy patients probably does not originate from the brain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"12 20","pages":"e70084"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hyperlactatemia is common during tumor craniotomy, but the underlying pathophysiology is unclear. This study measured simultaneous arterial and jugular-bulb lactate concentrations in patients undergoing brain tumor craniotomy to investigate the hypothesis that hyperlactatemia was associated with a net cerebrovascular lactate input. In 20 patients, arterial and jugular-bulb blood was collected hourly from the start of surgery to 6 h postoperatively for measurement of lactate, glucose, and oxygen concentration. For each marker, data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with jugular-bulb concentration as dependent variable, arterial concentration as fixed effect, and patient as random effect. Furthermore, we generated regression lines between arterial and jugular-bulb concentrations. The slope of the regression line between arterial and jugular-bulb lactate was 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97, R2 = 0.98), indicating that increasing arterial lactate levels were associated with an increasingly positive net cerebrovascular balance (net input). The line crossed the identity line at 2.86 (95% CI 0.57-5.16) mmol/L, indicating that lower levels of lactate were associated with a negative net cerebrovascular balance (net output). This suggests a switch from net lactate output during normolactatemia towards net input during hyperlactatemia. Hyperlactatemia in tumor-craniotomy patients probably does not originate from the brain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性脑肿瘤开颅手术患者动脉与颈静脉球部乳酸的差异。
高乳酸血症在肿瘤开颅手术中很常见,但其潜在的病理生理学尚不清楚。本研究同时测量了脑肿瘤开颅手术患者的动脉和颈静脉乳酸浓度,以研究高乳酸血症与脑血管乳酸净输入有关的假设。从手术开始到术后 6 小时,每小时采集 20 名患者的动脉血和颈静脉血,测量乳酸、葡萄糖和氧气浓度。对于每种标记物,我们都使用线性混合效应模型对数据进行分析,该模型以颈静脉壁浓度为因变量,动脉浓度为固定效应,患者为随机效应。此外,我们还生成了动脉和颈静脉球部浓度之间的回归线。动脉和颈部乳酸浓度之间的回归线斜率为 0.95(95% CI 0.93-0.97,R2 = 0.98),这表明动脉乳酸浓度的增加与脑血管净平衡(净输入)越来越正相关。这条线在 2.86 (95% CI 0.57-5.16) mmol/L 时与特征线交叉,表明较低的乳酸水平与负的脑血管净平衡(净输出)有关。这表明,正常乳酸血症时的乳酸净输出转为高乳酸血症时的净输入。肿瘤-开颅手术患者的高乳酸血症可能并非源于大脑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
期刊最新文献
Variability of ventilation during exercise is greater in adolescents than in adults. Hormonal profiles of eumenorrheic women compared to hormonal intrauterine device users. Exploring the relationship between reproductive aging, arterial stiffness, and cardiorespiratory fitness in women after menopause. Interplay between uromodulin excretion and water balance in the general adult population. Sex- and skeletal muscle-specific gene expression response of histone 3 lysine 27-modifying enzymes by voluntary running in mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1