Effectiveness of an Exercise and Educational-Based Prehabilitation Program in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (PREOptimize) on Functional Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzae151
Anabel Casanovas-Álvarez, Blanca Estanyol, Magda Ciendones, Josep Padròs, Jordi Cuartero, Agustí Barnadas, Bárbara García-Valdecasas, Rubèn González-Colom, Raquel Sebio-García, Jaume Masià
{"title":"Effectiveness of an Exercise and Educational-Based Prehabilitation Program in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (PREOptimize) on Functional Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Anabel Casanovas-Álvarez, Blanca Estanyol, Magda Ciendones, Josep Padròs, Jordi Cuartero, Agustí Barnadas, Bárbara García-Valdecasas, Rubèn González-Colom, Raquel Sebio-García, Jaume Masià","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzae151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study objective was to determine the effectiveness of a prehabilitation program to decrease postoperative musculoskeletal impairments in patients who have breast cancer and are receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had breast cancer and were receiving NAT before surgery were invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial. Patients randomized to the intervention group participated in a group-based prehabilitation program consisting of Nordic walking, resistance training, and therapeutic education from month 4 of NAT until before surgery. Patients in the control group received usual care (no prehabilitation). The main outcome was arm function measured with the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire 1 month after surgery. Other measures included pain, range of motion, functional capacity, cancer-related fatigue, handgrip strength, physical activity, and arm circumferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 patients were randomized during the study period, and 61 completed all assessments. A significant difference in the main outcome (short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) was found before surgery as patients in the control group experienced worsening in arm function (mean difference = -9.84, 95% CI = -17.7 to -2). In addition, they also showed increased symptom frequency/severity according to the combined scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) (mean difference = +6.7 points, 95% CI = 13.4 to 0.1) compared to the intervention group. Prehabilitation also improved functional capacity (mean difference = 67.6 m, 95% CI = 37.4 to 97.7) and physical activity levels and decreased cancer-related fatigue (mean difference = -1.3, 95% CI = -0.29 to -2.4) compared to the control group but had no effect on other secondary outcomes. After surgery, patients receiving prehabilitation also exhibited greater functional capacity at both 1 and 3 months. No other difference was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A prehabilitation program was able to maintain arm function and increase functional capacity while decreasing fatigue in patients with breast cancer receiving NAT.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Prehabilitation programs should be offered to patients with breast cancer to maintain functionality and enhance physical performance before surgery.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>An exercise program combined with therapeutic education in patients with breast cancer who receive neoadjuvant therapy before surgery can improve functional capacity and prevent declines of arm mobility and function.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study objective was to determine the effectiveness of a prehabilitation program to decrease postoperative musculoskeletal impairments in patients who have breast cancer and are receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).

Methods: Patients who had breast cancer and were receiving NAT before surgery were invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial. Patients randomized to the intervention group participated in a group-based prehabilitation program consisting of Nordic walking, resistance training, and therapeutic education from month 4 of NAT until before surgery. Patients in the control group received usual care (no prehabilitation). The main outcome was arm function measured with the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire 1 month after surgery. Other measures included pain, range of motion, functional capacity, cancer-related fatigue, handgrip strength, physical activity, and arm circumferences.

Results: A total of 64 patients were randomized during the study period, and 61 completed all assessments. A significant difference in the main outcome (short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) was found before surgery as patients in the control group experienced worsening in arm function (mean difference = -9.84, 95% CI = -17.7 to -2). In addition, they also showed increased symptom frequency/severity according to the combined scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) (mean difference = +6.7 points, 95% CI = 13.4 to 0.1) compared to the intervention group. Prehabilitation also improved functional capacity (mean difference = 67.6 m, 95% CI = 37.4 to 97.7) and physical activity levels and decreased cancer-related fatigue (mean difference = -1.3, 95% CI = -0.29 to -2.4) compared to the control group but had no effect on other secondary outcomes. After surgery, patients receiving prehabilitation also exhibited greater functional capacity at both 1 and 3 months. No other difference was observed.

Conclusion: A prehabilitation program was able to maintain arm function and increase functional capacity while decreasing fatigue in patients with breast cancer receiving NAT.

Impact: Prehabilitation programs should be offered to patients with breast cancer to maintain functionality and enhance physical performance before surgery.

Lay summary: An exercise program combined with therapeutic education in patients with breast cancer who receive neoadjuvant therapy before surgery can improve functional capacity and prevent declines of arm mobility and function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于运动和教育的乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗前康复计划 (PREOptimize) 对功能结果的影响:随机对照试验
研究目的研究目的是确定术前康复计划对减少接受新辅助治疗(NAT)的乳腺癌患者术后肌肉骨骼损伤的效果:方法:邀请在手术前接受新辅助治疗的乳腺癌患者参加这项随机对照试验。被随机分配到干预组的患者从接受新辅助治疗的第 4 个月起至手术前参加了一个以小组为基础的康复计划,该计划包括北欧式步行、阻力训练和治疗教育。对照组患者接受常规护理(无康复训练)。主要结果是在手术后 1 个月使用简易版手臂、肩部和手部残疾问卷测量手臂功能。其他测量指标包括疼痛、活动范围、功能能力、癌症相关疲劳、手握力、体力活动和臂围:在研究期间,共有 64 名患者接受了随机治疗,其中 61 人完成了所有评估。主要结果(短版手臂、肩部和手部残疾问卷)显示,对照组患者的手臂功能恶化(平均差异 = -9.84,95% CI = -17.7至-2),而对照组患者的手臂功能恶化(平均差异 = -9.84,95% CI = -17.7至-2)。此外,根据欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷(EORTC-QQL-C30)的综合量表,与干预组相比,他们的症状频率/严重程度也有所增加(平均差异=+6.7分,95% CI=13.4至0.1)。与对照组相比,康复治疗还提高了功能能力(平均差异=67.6米,95% CI=37.4至97.7)和体力活动水平,减少了癌症相关疲劳(平均差异=-1.3,95% CI=-0.29至-2.4),但对其他次要结果没有影响。术后 1 个月和 3 个月,接受术前康复训练的患者也表现出更强的功能能力。结论结论:接受 NAT 的乳腺癌患者在接受术前康复训练后,能够保持手臂功能并提高功能能力,同时减少疲劳感:影响:应向乳腺癌患者提供术前康复计划,以维持患者的功能并提高其术后体能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
期刊最新文献
Outpatient Physical Therapy Attendance by Older Adults After Emergency Department Discharge was a Predictor for Lower 30-Day Revisits-But Demographic Factors Affected Attendance. Diabetic Foot Ulcer beyond Wound Closure: Clinical Practice Guideline. Optimizing the Accuracy and Precision of the Minimal Detectable Change Statistic: Secondary Analysis of Test-Retest Data from the NIH Toolbox Study. Chronic Underrepresentation of Females and Women in Stroke Research Adversely Impacts Clinical Care. Online Graded Motor Imagery Is Effective in Women Diagnosed with Pelvic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1