Analysis of progression-free and overall survival in ovarian cancer: Bevacizumab treatment outcomes using historical cohort.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Pharmazie Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1691/ph.2024.4570
I Conic, B Nedovic, R Zivadinovic, R Zivadinovic, A Petric, S Stojnev, I Petkovic, D Krtinic, M Radic
{"title":"Analysis of progression-free and overall survival in ovarian cancer: Bevacizumab treatment outcomes using historical cohort.","authors":"I Conic, B Nedovic, R Zivadinovic, R Zivadinovic, A Petric, S Stojnev, I Petkovic, D Krtinic, M Radic","doi":"10.1691/ph.2024.4570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> The incorporation of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has redefined therapeutic strategies for advanced ovarian cancer. This study evaluates the efficacy of bevacizumab combined with standard chemotherapy by comparing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes with a historical cohort of patients treated with standard chemotherapy alone. <i>Methods:</i> We conducted an analysis of 71 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated at the University Clinical Center in Niš, Serbia, from April 2017 to March 2023. All patients received standard chemotherapy paired with bevacizumab and were monitored for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age, ECOG performance status, presence of metastases, and pleural effusion. Additionally, a historical cohort of 30 patients treated with standard chemotherapy alone was used for comparison, and Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing treatment outcomes. <i>Results:</i> The study findings indicate significant improvements in median PFS (20 months vs. 15 months) and OS (58 months vs. an undetermined upper limit) compared to the historical cohort. Subgroup analysis of the bevacizumab-treated group revealed that younger patients (<65 years) and those without metastases or pleural effusion exhibited notably better survival outcomes. The hazard ratio for PFS in patients younger than 65 was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45-0.93), suggesting a substantial reduction in disease progression risk compared to older patients. <i>Conclusion:</i> Bevacizumab, when used alongside standard chemotherapy, significantly extends both PFS and OS in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. These benefits are particularly pronounced in younger patients. The results underscore the necessity of integrating bevacizumab into the treatment regimen for advanced ovarian cancer, advocating for tailored therapeutic strategies based on individual risk profiles and clinical characteristics. This study reinforces the pivotal role of bevacizumab in enhancing the current ovarian cancer treatment landscape and highlights the potential for further personalizing oncological care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20145,"journal":{"name":"Pharmazie","volume":"79 9","pages":"195-201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmazie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1691/ph.2024.4570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incorporation of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has redefined therapeutic strategies for advanced ovarian cancer. This study evaluates the efficacy of bevacizumab combined with standard chemotherapy by comparing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes with a historical cohort of patients treated with standard chemotherapy alone. Methods: We conducted an analysis of 71 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated at the University Clinical Center in Niš, Serbia, from April 2017 to March 2023. All patients received standard chemotherapy paired with bevacizumab and were monitored for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age, ECOG performance status, presence of metastases, and pleural effusion. Additionally, a historical cohort of 30 patients treated with standard chemotherapy alone was used for comparison, and Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing treatment outcomes. Results: The study findings indicate significant improvements in median PFS (20 months vs. 15 months) and OS (58 months vs. an undetermined upper limit) compared to the historical cohort. Subgroup analysis of the bevacizumab-treated group revealed that younger patients (<65 years) and those without metastases or pleural effusion exhibited notably better survival outcomes. The hazard ratio for PFS in patients younger than 65 was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45-0.93), suggesting a substantial reduction in disease progression risk compared to older patients. Conclusion: Bevacizumab, when used alongside standard chemotherapy, significantly extends both PFS and OS in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. These benefits are particularly pronounced in younger patients. The results underscore the necessity of integrating bevacizumab into the treatment regimen for advanced ovarian cancer, advocating for tailored therapeutic strategies based on individual risk profiles and clinical characteristics. This study reinforces the pivotal role of bevacizumab in enhancing the current ovarian cancer treatment landscape and highlights the potential for further personalizing oncological care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卵巢癌无进展生存期和总生存期分析:利用历史队列分析贝伐单抗的治疗效果
背景:贝伐单抗是一种靶向血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的单克隆抗体,它的加入重新定义了晚期卵巢癌的治疗策略。本研究通过比较无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)结果与单独接受标准化疗的历史患者队列,评估贝伐单抗与标准化疗联合治疗的疗效。研究方法我们对2017年4月至2023年3月期间在塞尔维亚尼什大学临床中心接受治疗的71名晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者进行了分析。所有患者均接受了标准化疗与贝伐珠单抗配伍治疗,并使用卡普兰-梅耶估计值监测无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。根据年龄、ECOG 表现状态、有无转移灶和胸腔积液进行了分组分析。此外,研究人员还将单独接受标准化疗的30名患者组成历史队列进行比较,并进行了Cox回归分析,以确定影响治疗结果的因素。研究结果研究结果表明,与历史队列相比,中位 PFS(20 个月对 15 个月)和 OS(58 个月对未确定上限)均有明显改善。贝伐珠单抗治疗组的分组分析显示,年轻患者(结论:贝伐珠单抗治疗组的中位生存期(20 个月 vs. 15 个月)和OS(58 个月 vs. 未确定的上限)明显改善:贝伐单抗与标准化疗同时使用可显著延长晚期卵巢癌患者的生存期和手术时间。这些益处在年轻患者中尤为明显。研究结果强调了将贝伐珠单抗纳入晚期卵巢癌治疗方案的必要性,提倡根据个体风险特征和临床特点制定量身定制的治疗策略。这项研究加强了贝伐单抗在改善目前卵巢癌治疗状况中的关键作用,并突出了进一步个性化肿瘤治疗的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmazie
Pharmazie 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.2 months
期刊介绍: The journal DiePharmazie publishs reviews, experimental studies, letters to the editor, as well as book reviews. The following fields of pharmacy are covered: Pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry; Pharmaceutical analysis and drug control; Pharmaceutical technolgy; Biopharmacy (biopharmaceutics, pharmacokinetics, biotransformation); Experimental and clinical pharmacology; Pharmaceutical biology (pharmacognosy); Clinical pharmacy; History of pharmacy.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of progression-free and overall survival in ovarian cancer: Bevacizumab treatment outcomes using historical cohort. Comparison of pharmacotherapeutic analgesic response and safety profile of tapentadol with other opioids. Cross-reactivity of triptans and sulfonamide antibiotics - a clinically relevant question? Impact of medication reconciliation and medication reviews on the incidence of preventable adverse drug reactions during hospitalization of elderly patients. A randomized controlled trial. Potential effects of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medication on body height and body weight in a longitudinal pediatric cohort study, the LIFE Child study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1