Variable-RBE-induced NTCP predictions for various side-effects following proton therapy for brain tumors – Identification of high-risk patients and risk mitigation

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110590
Martina Palkowitsch , Lisa-Marie Kaufmann , Fabian Hennings , Stefan Menkel , Christian Hahn , Jona Bensberg , Armin Lühr , Annekatrin Seidlitz , Esther G.C. Troost , Mechthild Krause , Steffen Löck
{"title":"Variable-RBE-induced NTCP predictions for various side-effects following proton therapy for brain tumors – Identification of high-risk patients and risk mitigation","authors":"Martina Palkowitsch ,&nbsp;Lisa-Marie Kaufmann ,&nbsp;Fabian Hennings ,&nbsp;Stefan Menkel ,&nbsp;Christian Hahn ,&nbsp;Jona Bensberg ,&nbsp;Armin Lühr ,&nbsp;Annekatrin Seidlitz ,&nbsp;Esther G.C. Troost ,&nbsp;Mechthild Krause ,&nbsp;Steffen Löck","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Disregarding the increase of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) may raise the risk of acute and late adverse events after proton beam therapy (PBT). This study aims to explore the relationship between variable RBE (above 1.1)-induced normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) and patient-specific factors, identify patients at high risk of RBE-induced NTCP increase, and assess risk mitigation by incorporating RBE variability into treatment planning.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 105 primary brain tumor patients treated with PBT (RBE = 1.1). We calculated differences in estimated NTCP (ΔNTCP) using a variable RBE-weighted dose (D<sub>RBE</sub>, Wedenberg model) and a constant RBE-weighted dose (D<sub>RBE=1.1</sub>), across 16 NTCP models. These differences were correlated with patient-specific characteristics. Based on ΔNTCP, patients were classified as high risk (32 %) or low risk (68 %) for adverse events due to RBE-induced NTCP. This classification was compared with alternative classifications based on (a) relevant patient-specific characteristics, (b) D<sub>RBE=1.1</sub>, and (c) the difference between D<sub>RBE</sub> and D<sub>RBE=1.1</sub> (ΔD), assessing the balanced accuracy. The potential to reduce RBE-induced NTCP through track-end and linear energy transfer (LET) optimization was evaluated in six example patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Using a variable RBE instead of a constant one resulted in NTCP increases (up to 32 percentage points). Variable-RBE-induced NTCP increases were strongly negatively correlated with the distance between the clinical target volume (CTV) and the organ at risk (OAR) for most side-effects, and positively correlated with CTV volume for certain side-effects. High increases were associated with (a) specific patient factors, particularly the proximity of the CTV to OARs, (b) D<sub>RBE=1.1</sub>, and (c) ΔD, with a balanced accuracy of 0.88, 0.94, and 0.86, respectively. Optimization of track-ends and LET considerably reduced NTCP values, achieving a mean reduction of 31 % for optimized OARs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The risk of variable-RBE-induced NTCP strongly depends on patient-specific factors and the considered side-effect. A small distance between the tumor and OARs notably increases the risk. Integrating biologically-guided objectives into treatment planning can effectively mitigate the risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 110590"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024035680","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Disregarding the increase of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) may raise the risk of acute and late adverse events after proton beam therapy (PBT). This study aims to explore the relationship between variable RBE (above 1.1)-induced normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) and patient-specific factors, identify patients at high risk of RBE-induced NTCP increase, and assess risk mitigation by incorporating RBE variability into treatment planning.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed 105 primary brain tumor patients treated with PBT (RBE = 1.1). We calculated differences in estimated NTCP (ΔNTCP) using a variable RBE-weighted dose (DRBE, Wedenberg model) and a constant RBE-weighted dose (DRBE=1.1), across 16 NTCP models. These differences were correlated with patient-specific characteristics. Based on ΔNTCP, patients were classified as high risk (32 %) or low risk (68 %) for adverse events due to RBE-induced NTCP. This classification was compared with alternative classifications based on (a) relevant patient-specific characteristics, (b) DRBE=1.1, and (c) the difference between DRBE and DRBE=1.1 (ΔD), assessing the balanced accuracy. The potential to reduce RBE-induced NTCP through track-end and linear energy transfer (LET) optimization was evaluated in six example patients.

Results

Using a variable RBE instead of a constant one resulted in NTCP increases (up to 32 percentage points). Variable-RBE-induced NTCP increases were strongly negatively correlated with the distance between the clinical target volume (CTV) and the organ at risk (OAR) for most side-effects, and positively correlated with CTV volume for certain side-effects. High increases were associated with (a) specific patient factors, particularly the proximity of the CTV to OARs, (b) DRBE=1.1, and (c) ΔD, with a balanced accuracy of 0.88, 0.94, and 0.86, respectively. Optimization of track-ends and LET considerably reduced NTCP values, achieving a mean reduction of 31 % for optimized OARs.

Conclusion

The risk of variable-RBE-induced NTCP strongly depends on patient-specific factors and the considered side-effect. A small distance between the tumor and OARs notably increases the risk. Integrating biologically-guided objectives into treatment planning can effectively mitigate the risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质子治疗脑肿瘤后各种副作用的可变 RBE 诱导的 NTCP 预测--识别高风险患者并降低风险。
背景和目的:忽视相对生物效应(RBE)的增加可能会增加质子束治疗(PBT)后发生急性和晚期不良事件的风险。本研究旨在探讨可变 RBE(高于 1.1)诱导的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)与患者特异性因素之间的关系,识别 RBE 诱导的 NTCP 增加的高风险患者,并通过将 RBE 变异纳入治疗计划来评估风险缓解措施 材料与方法:我们回顾性分析了 105 例接受 PBT(RBE = 1.1)治疗的原发性脑肿瘤患者。我们计算了在 16 种 NTCP 模型中,使用可变 RBE 加权剂量(DRBE,Wedenberg 模型)和恒定 RBE 加权剂量(DRBE=1.1)估计 NTCP 的差异(ΔNTCP)。这些差异与患者的特异性特征相关。根据ΔNTCP,患者因 RBE 引起的 NTCP 而发生不良事件的风险被分为高风险(32%)和低风险(68%)。该分类方法与基于以下因素的其他分类方法进行了比较:(a) 相关患者特异性特征;(b) DRBE=1.1;(c) DRBE 与 DRBE=1.1 之间的差值 (ΔD),以评估平衡准确性。在六例患者中评估了通过轨迹端和线性能量转移(LET)优化来减少 RBE 引起的 NTCP 的潜力:结果:使用可变 RBE 而不是恒定 RBE 会导致 NTCP 增加(最多 32 个百分点)。就大多数副作用而言,可变 RBE 引起的 NTCP 增加与临床靶体积(CTV)和危险器官(OAR)之间的距离呈强负相关,而就某些副作用而言,则与 CTV 体积呈正相关。高增幅与以下因素有关:(a) 特定患者因素,尤其是 CTV 与 OAR 的距离;(b) DRBE=1.1;(c) ΔD,平衡精度分别为 0.88、0.94 和 0.86。轨道末端和 LET 的优化大大降低了 NTCP 值,优化后的 OAR 平均降低了 31%:结论:可变 RBE 引起 NTCP 的风险很大程度上取决于患者的具体因素和考虑的副作用。肿瘤与 OAR 之间的距离越小,风险越大。将生物导向目标纳入治疗计划可有效降低风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
A critical reflection of radiotherapy on osseous free flaps in mandibular segmental resection and immediate reconstruction in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: A cohort study Intensity-modulated proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated ARC therapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A long-term, multicenter cohort study. Prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Contents International collaboration of neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: The INTERNEO individual patient data pooled analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1