Cardiovascular and kidney benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs according to baseline blood pressure in type 2 diabetes: a systematic meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1080/14017431.2024.2418086
Setor K Kunutsor, Samuel Seidu, Richard S Dey, Isaac K Baidoo, Abderrahim Oulhaj
{"title":"Cardiovascular and kidney benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs according to baseline blood pressure in type 2 diabetes: a systematic meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials.","authors":"Setor K Kunutsor, Samuel Seidu, Richard S Dey, Isaac K Baidoo, Abderrahim Oulhaj","doi":"10.1080/14017431.2024.2418086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using a systematic meta-analysis, we investigated if patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and with varying baseline blood pressure (BP) differ in the cardiorenal benefits received from sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). <i>Design:</i> Randomized, placebo-controlled, cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2024. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were pooled. The differential treatment effect by baseline BP category within each trial was estimated as the ratio of the HR (RHR) and pooled. <i>Results:</i> Seventeen publications based on 9 unique CVOTs (4 SGLT-2is and 5 GLP-1RAs) were eligible. In participants with normal baseline BP, comparing SGLT-2is with placebo, the HRs (95% CIs) were 0.88 (0.79-0.97) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), 0.73 (0.59-0.91) for heart failure (HF) hospitalization, 0.78 (0.65-0.94) for composite CVD death/HF hospitalization, and 0.55 (0.41-0.73) for composite renal outcome. The corresponding estimates for participants with higher baseline BP were 0.88 (0.81-0.96), 0.67 (0.57-0.79), 0.73 (0.65-0.82), and 0.61 (0.48-0.77), respectively. In participants with normal baseline BP, GLP-RAs had no strong effect on MACE, stroke and nephropathy, but reduced stroke and nephropathy risk in those with higher baseline BP. Estimated RHRs showed no statistical evidence that baseline BP modified the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs. <i>Conclusions:</i> In patients with T2D, the cardiorenal benefits of treatment with SGLT2-Is and GLP1-RAs were similar in patients with normal baseline BP compared to those with a higher baseline BP.</p>","PeriodicalId":21383,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","volume":"58 1","pages":"2418086"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2024.2418086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a systematic meta-analysis, we investigated if patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and with varying baseline blood pressure (BP) differ in the cardiorenal benefits received from sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2024. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were pooled. The differential treatment effect by baseline BP category within each trial was estimated as the ratio of the HR (RHR) and pooled. Results: Seventeen publications based on 9 unique CVOTs (4 SGLT-2is and 5 GLP-1RAs) were eligible. In participants with normal baseline BP, comparing SGLT-2is with placebo, the HRs (95% CIs) were 0.88 (0.79-0.97) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), 0.73 (0.59-0.91) for heart failure (HF) hospitalization, 0.78 (0.65-0.94) for composite CVD death/HF hospitalization, and 0.55 (0.41-0.73) for composite renal outcome. The corresponding estimates for participants with higher baseline BP were 0.88 (0.81-0.96), 0.67 (0.57-0.79), 0.73 (0.65-0.82), and 0.61 (0.48-0.77), respectively. In participants with normal baseline BP, GLP-RAs had no strong effect on MACE, stroke and nephropathy, but reduced stroke and nephropathy risk in those with higher baseline BP. Estimated RHRs showed no statistical evidence that baseline BP modified the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs. Conclusions: In patients with T2D, the cardiorenal benefits of treatment with SGLT2-Is and GLP1-RAs were similar in patients with normal baseline BP compared to those with a higher baseline BP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据 2 型糖尿病患者的基线血压对 SGLT-2is 和 GLP-1RA 的心血管和肾脏益处进行系统性荟萃分析。
通过系统荟萃分析,我们研究了基线血压(BP)不同的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者从钠-葡萄糖协同转运体 2 抑制剂(SGLT-2is)和胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)中获得的心肾功能益处是否存在差异。设计:从截至 2024 年 4 月的 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆中查找 SGLT-2is 和 GLP-1RA 的随机、安慰剂对照、心血管结局试验 (CVOT)。对带有 95% CI 的危险比 (HR) 进行了汇总。每项试验中基线血压类别的不同治疗效果以 HR(RHR)的比值估算并汇总。结果:基于 9 项独特的 CVOT(4 项 SGLT-2is 和 5 项 GLP-1RAs)的 17 篇出版物符合条件。在基线血压正常的参与者中,将 SGLT-2is 与安慰剂进行比较,主要不良心血管事件 (MACE) 的 HRs(95% CIs)为 0.88(0.79-0.97),心力衰竭 (HF) 住院的 HRs 为 0.73(0.59-0.91),心血管疾病死亡/HF 住院综合 HRs 为 0.78(0.65-0.94),肾脏综合结果的 HRs 为 0.55(0.41-0.73)。基线血压较高的参与者的相应估计值分别为 0.88(0.81-0.96)、0.67(0.57-0.79)、0.73(0.65-0.82)和 0.61(0.48-0.77)。在基线血压正常的参与者中,GLP-RAs对MACE、中风和肾病没有明显影响,但对基线血压较高的参与者,GLP-RAs可降低中风和肾病风险。估算的 RHRs 显示,没有统计学证据表明基线血压会改变 SGLT-2is 和 GLP-1RAs 对心肾功能的益处。结论:在 T2D 患者中,与基线血压较高的患者相比,基线血压正常的患者接受 SGLT2-Is 和 GLP1-RAs 治疗的心血管获益相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal is to promote cardiovascular research that crosses the borders between disciplines. The journal is a forum for the entire field of cardiovascular research, basic and clinical including: • Cardiology - Interventional and non-invasive • Cardiovascular epidemiology • Cardiovascular anaesthesia and intensive care • Cardiovascular surgery • Cardiovascular radiology • Clinical physiology • Transplantation of thoracic organs
期刊最新文献
CircFNDC3B inhibits vascular smooth muscle cells proliferation in abdominal aortic aneurysms by targeting the miR-1270/PDCD10 axis. The efficacy of colchicine compared to placebo for preventing ischemic stroke among individuals with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Multivariate and survival analysis of prognosis and surgical benefits in infective endocarditis. The use of antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation in Finland 2007-2018. The effect of COVID-19 on cardiovascular function and exercise tolerance in healthy middle-age and older individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1