Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in combination with deep regional hyperthermia followed by surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1007/s00066-024-02312-9
Adela Ademaj, Sonja Stieb, Cihan Gani, Oliver J Ott, Dietmar Marder, Roger A Hälg, Susanne Rogers, Pirus Ghadjar, Rainer Fietkau, Hans Crezee, Oliver Riesterer
{"title":"Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in combination with deep regional hyperthermia followed by surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Adela Ademaj, Sonja Stieb, Cihan Gani, Oliver J Ott, Dietmar Marder, Roger A Hälg, Susanne Rogers, Pirus Ghadjar, Rainer Fietkau, Hans Crezee, Oliver Riesterer","doi":"10.1007/s00066-024-02312-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Combining chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with deep regional hyperthermia (HT) shows promise for enhancing clinical outcomes in selected rectal cancer patients. This study aimed to integrate the evidence and evaluate the efficacy of this combined treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Mendeley databases was performed. This review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Random-effects meta-analyses (DerSimonian and Laird) were performed. The primary outcome was pathological complete response (pCR), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 12 studies were included, mostly of moderate quality. Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC; n = 760) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC; n = 22) were eligible. The pooled pCR rate was 19% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16-22%) among all 782 patients and 19% (95%CI:16-23%) among 760 LARC patients. Due to significant study heterogeneity, survival outcomes were pooled by excluding LRRC patients. The pooled 5‑year OS rate among 433 LARC patients was 87% (95%CI: 83-90%). The pooled 5‑year DFS and LRFS in LARC patients were 75% (95%CI: 70-80%) and 95% (95%CI: 92-97%), respectively. There was a lack of consistent reporting of HT treatment parameters and toxicity symptoms among the studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The collective clinical evidence showed that neoadjuvant CRT combined with HT in rectal cancer patients is feasible, with a 19% pCR rate and excellent survival outcomes in long term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":21998,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-024-02312-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Combining chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with deep regional hyperthermia (HT) shows promise for enhancing clinical outcomes in selected rectal cancer patients. This study aimed to integrate the evidence and evaluate the efficacy of this combined treatment approach.

Materials and methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Mendeley databases was performed. This review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Random-effects meta-analyses (DerSimonian and Laird) were performed. The primary outcome was pathological complete response (pCR), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and toxicity.

Results: In total, 12 studies were included, mostly of moderate quality. Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC; n = 760) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC; n = 22) were eligible. The pooled pCR rate was 19% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16-22%) among all 782 patients and 19% (95%CI:16-23%) among 760 LARC patients. Due to significant study heterogeneity, survival outcomes were pooled by excluding LRRC patients. The pooled 5‑year OS rate among 433 LARC patients was 87% (95%CI: 83-90%). The pooled 5‑year DFS and LRFS in LARC patients were 75% (95%CI: 70-80%) and 95% (95%CI: 92-97%), respectively. There was a lack of consistent reporting of HT treatment parameters and toxicity symptoms among the studies.

Conclusion: The collective clinical evidence showed that neoadjuvant CRT combined with HT in rectal cancer patients is feasible, with a 19% pCR rate and excellent survival outcomes in long term follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直肠癌手术后的新辅助化放疗联合深部区域热疗:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:化放疗(CRT)与深部区域热疗(HT)相结合有望提高部分直肠癌患者的临床疗效。本研究旨在整合证据并评估这种联合治疗方法的疗效:对 PubMed、Scopus 和 Mendeley 数据库进行了系统检索。本综述根据 PRISMA 指南进行。研究质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行评估。进行了随机效应荟萃分析(DerSimonian 和 Laird)。主要结果为病理完全反应(pCR),次要终点为总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、无局部复发生存期(LRFS)和毒性:结果:共纳入了 12 项研究,大部分研究质量中等。符合条件的患者包括局部晚期直肠癌(LARC;n = 760)和局部复发直肠癌(LRRC;n = 22)患者。在所有 782 例患者中,汇总的 pCR 率为 19%(95% 置信区间 [CI]:16-22%),在 760 例 LARC 患者中,汇总的 pCR 率为 19%(95% 置信区间 [CI]:16-23%)。由于研究存在明显的异质性,因此在汇总生存结果时排除了 LRRC 患者。在433名LARC患者中,汇总的5年OS率为87%(95%CI:83-90%)。LARC患者的5年DFS和LRFS分别为75%(95%CI:70-80%)和95%(95%CI:92-97%)。各研究对 HT 治疗参数和毒性症状的报告缺乏一致性:综合临床证据表明,新辅助 CRT 联合 HT 治疗直肠癌患者是可行的,pCR 率为 19%,长期随访的生存结果极佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.90%
发文量
141
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, published monthly, is a scientific journal that covers all aspects of oncology with focus on radiooncology, radiation biology and radiation physics. The articles are not only of interest to radiooncologists but to all physicians interested in oncology, to radiation biologists and radiation physicists. The journal publishes original articles, review articles and case studies that are peer-reviewed. It includes scientific short communications as well as a literature review with annotated articles that inform the reader on new developments in the various disciplines concerned and hence allow for a sound overview on the latest results in radiooncology research. Founded in 1912, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the oldest oncological journal in the world. Today, contributions are published in English and German. All articles have English summaries and legends. The journal is the official publication of several scientific radiooncological societies and publishes the relevant communications of these societies.
期刊最新文献
[Longterm outcome of definitive radiotherapy using IMRT vs. 3D-CRT in locally advanced, inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)]. Non-coding RNAs modulation in breast cancer radioresponse: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Interstitial HDR brachytherapy for anal cancer-results and quality of life. Efficacy of palliative hemostatic radiotherapy for tumor bleeding and pain relief in locally advanced pelvic gynecological malignancies. Friedrich Dessauer-reflections on his political and personal sacrifices : In reply to: Benzaquen et al. "Friedrich Dessauer (1881-1963): The forgotten medical physicist, politician, and philosopher".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1