Characterizing Depth Electrode Coverage in Stereoelectroencephalography on Seizure Onset Zone Localization and Seizure Outcomes.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1159/000541098
Rohan Jha, Aaron E L Warren, Noah L A Nawabi, Pariya Salami, Angelique C Paulk, Sydney S Cash, John D Rolston
{"title":"Characterizing Depth Electrode Coverage in Stereoelectroencephalography on Seizure Onset Zone Localization and Seizure Outcomes.","authors":"Rohan Jha, Aaron E L Warren, Noah L A Nawabi, Pariya Salami, Angelique C Paulk, Sydney S Cash, John D Rolston","doi":"10.1159/000541098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number of intracranial depth electrodes implanted in stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) investigations is primarily driven by the preimplantation hypothesis about SOZ location. Targeting is not standardized and highly variable between centers. Whether some of these electrodes may prove redundant, or target low-yield areas too frequently, is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified a retrospective multi-institutional cohort implanted with depth electrodes for iEEG monitoring between 2003 and 2022. We collected preoperative clinical features and iEEG investigation parameters, including the number of depth electrodes and contacts implanted. We built a propensity-matched cohort with respect to these covariates and evaluated outcomes, which included (1) the likelihood of SOZ localization, (2) complications, and (3) seizure-free outcomes as a function of electrode contact coverage. In addition, we aimed to identify brain regions commonly explored in conjunction with each other and identify the likelihood of a region being implicated in initial electroclinical seizure onset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-seven patients were followed for a median of 3.8 (range 2, 18) years after SEEG. Propensity-matched cohorts demonstrated that a higher number of implanted contacts were associated with a greater likelihood of proceeding to treatment, but were not associated with SOZ localization, seizure freedom (Engel I), favorable seizure outcomes (Engel I/II), or complications, per Bayes factor analysis. Lateral orbitofrontal, supramarginal, posterior cingulate, inferior parietal, and inferior temporal areas were least likely to be implicated in initial electrographic onset, whereas hippocampus, caudal middle frontal, pericalcarine, and parahippocampal areas were most likely when controlling for electrode coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SEEG effectively localizes the SOZ in both lesional and non-lesional etiologies, and clinicians are generally optimizing the electrode coverage for hypothetical SOZ localization, leading to further therapeutic surgeries that may confer seizure freedom. Nevertheless, several areas are possibly being explored despite low likelihood (&lt;2.5%) of participation within the SOZ.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541098","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The number of intracranial depth electrodes implanted in stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) investigations is primarily driven by the preimplantation hypothesis about SOZ location. Targeting is not standardized and highly variable between centers. Whether some of these electrodes may prove redundant, or target low-yield areas too frequently, is uncertain.

Methods: We identified a retrospective multi-institutional cohort implanted with depth electrodes for iEEG monitoring between 2003 and 2022. We collected preoperative clinical features and iEEG investigation parameters, including the number of depth electrodes and contacts implanted. We built a propensity-matched cohort with respect to these covariates and evaluated outcomes, which included (1) the likelihood of SOZ localization, (2) complications, and (3) seizure-free outcomes as a function of electrode contact coverage. In addition, we aimed to identify brain regions commonly explored in conjunction with each other and identify the likelihood of a region being implicated in initial electroclinical seizure onset.

Results: One hundred and sixty-seven patients were followed for a median of 3.8 (range 2, 18) years after SEEG. Propensity-matched cohorts demonstrated that a higher number of implanted contacts were associated with a greater likelihood of proceeding to treatment, but were not associated with SOZ localization, seizure freedom (Engel I), favorable seizure outcomes (Engel I/II), or complications, per Bayes factor analysis. Lateral orbitofrontal, supramarginal, posterior cingulate, inferior parietal, and inferior temporal areas were least likely to be implicated in initial electrographic onset, whereas hippocampus, caudal middle frontal, pericalcarine, and parahippocampal areas were most likely when controlling for electrode coverage.

Conclusions: SEEG effectively localizes the SOZ in both lesional and non-lesional etiologies, and clinicians are generally optimizing the electrode coverage for hypothetical SOZ localization, leading to further therapeutic surgeries that may confer seizure freedom. Nevertheless, several areas are possibly being explored despite low likelihood (<2.5%) of participation within the SOZ.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立体脑电图深度电极覆盖对癫痫发作起始区定位和癫痫发作结果的影响。
导言:立体脑电图(SEEG)检查中植入颅内深度电极的数量主要取决于植入前对 SOZ 位置的假设。定位并不是标准化的,而且不同中心的定位差异很大。这些电极中是否有一些可能被证明是多余的,或者是否过于频繁地瞄准低收益区域,目前还不确定:我们确定了 2003 年至 2022 年间植入深度电极进行 iEEG 监测的多机构回顾性队列。我们收集了术前临床特征和 iEEG 检查参数,包括植入深度电极的数量和触点。我们根据这些协变量建立了倾向匹配队列,并评估了结果,其中包括:(1) SOZ 定位的可能性;(2) 并发症;(3) 作为电极触点覆盖率函数的无癫痫发作结果。此外,我们还旨在确定共同探讨的脑区,并确定某一区域与最初的电临床癫痫发作有牵连的可能性:167 名患者在 SEEG 后接受了中位 3.8 年(2-18 年不等)的随访。倾向匹配队列显示,植入触点数量越多,接受治疗的可能性越大,但根据贝叶斯因子分析,植入触点数量与 SOZ 定位、癫痫发作自由度(恩格尔 I)、良好的癫痫发作结果(恩格尔 I/II)或并发症无关。眶额叶外侧、边缘上部、扣带回后部、顶叶下部和颞叶下部区域最不可能与最初的电图发病有关,而海马、额叶尾中部、心周和海马旁区域最可能与电极覆盖范围有关:SEEG能有效定位病变和非病变病因中的SOZ,临床医生通常会优化电极覆盖范围以进行假定的SOZ定位,从而进一步进行治疗性手术,以获得癫痫发作自由。不过,尽管参与 SOZ 的可能性较低(2.5%),但仍有几个领域可能正在探索之中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1