Xianqi Shen, Jialun Li, Zenghui Zhou, Wenhui Zhang, Jin Ji, Min Qu, Yan Wang, Xu Gao
{"title":"The significance of pelvic lymph node dissection in radical prostatectomy and its influence on the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer.","authors":"Xianqi Shen, Jialun Li, Zenghui Zhou, Wenhui Zhang, Jin Ji, Min Qu, Yan Wang, Xu Gao","doi":"10.21037/tau-24-200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is regarded as a crucial component of radical prostatectomy (RP); however, it also increases the probability of postoperative complications. This study aimed to investigate the significance of PLND in the treatment of prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,474 patients with complete clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors of PLND and lymph node metastasis (LNM). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between patients in different groups, along with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to explore the impact of PLND on oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,474 patients, 956 (64.9%) underwent PLND, and 159 (16.6%) had LNM. The positive rate of lymph nodes in the extended PLND (ePLND) group was higher than that in the obturator resection group (20.58% <i>vs.</i> 10.05%, P<0.001). Multivariable Logistic regression showed that age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, clinical T stage and risk stratification were correlated with PLND during RP (P<0.05); ISUP grade, clinical T staging and risk stratification increased the risk of LNM (P<0.05). After PSM, patients in RP group had similar survival compared to the PLND group (P=0.80); the ePLND group and obturator resection group also achieved equivalent survival (P=0.16). Among lymph node-positive patients, the disease progression-free survival in the adjuvant therapy group seemed superior to the non-adjuvant therapy group (P<0.001); and the adjuvant therapy group had better survival than those without PLND (P=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ePLND is recommended for patients with indications of lymphadenectomy, which can significantly optimize the detection rate of positive lymph nodes and provide guidance for subsequent adjuvant therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"13 9","pages":"2070-2078"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is regarded as a crucial component of radical prostatectomy (RP); however, it also increases the probability of postoperative complications. This study aimed to investigate the significance of PLND in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Methods: A total of 1,474 patients with complete clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors of PLND and lymph node metastasis (LNM). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between patients in different groups, along with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to explore the impact of PLND on oncological outcomes.
Results: Of the 1,474 patients, 956 (64.9%) underwent PLND, and 159 (16.6%) had LNM. The positive rate of lymph nodes in the extended PLND (ePLND) group was higher than that in the obturator resection group (20.58% vs. 10.05%, P<0.001). Multivariable Logistic regression showed that age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, clinical T stage and risk stratification were correlated with PLND during RP (P<0.05); ISUP grade, clinical T staging and risk stratification increased the risk of LNM (P<0.05). After PSM, patients in RP group had similar survival compared to the PLND group (P=0.80); the ePLND group and obturator resection group also achieved equivalent survival (P=0.16). Among lymph node-positive patients, the disease progression-free survival in the adjuvant therapy group seemed superior to the non-adjuvant therapy group (P<0.001); and the adjuvant therapy group had better survival than those without PLND (P=0.02).
Conclusions: ePLND is recommended for patients with indications of lymphadenectomy, which can significantly optimize the detection rate of positive lymph nodes and provide guidance for subsequent adjuvant therapy.
期刊介绍：
ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
