Diagnostic efficacy of cryobiopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions with ground-glass opacity: a propensity score-matched analysis.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Translational lung cancer research Pub Date : 2024-09-30 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI:10.21037/tlcr-24-304
Hideaki Furuse, Yuji Matsumoto, Toshiyuki Nakai, Midori Tanaka, Kanako Nishimatsu, Keigo Uchimura, Tatsuya Imabayashi, Takaaki Tsuchida
{"title":"Diagnostic efficacy of cryobiopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions with ground-glass opacity: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Hideaki Furuse, Yuji Matsumoto, Toshiyuki Nakai, Midori Tanaka, Kanako Nishimatsu, Keigo Uchimura, Tatsuya Imabayashi, Takaaki Tsuchida","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-24-304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) with ground-glass opacity (GGO) are generally difficult to diagnose via bronchoscopy. Cryobiopsy, a recently introduced technique, provides quantitatively and qualitatively superior tissues compared with conventional biopsy methods and can improve diagnostic outcomes. However, its diagnostic accuracy has not been specifically investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether the combined use of cryobiopsy improves the diagnostic yield for PPLs with GGO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent bronchoscopy combined with radial endobronchial ultrasound and virtual bronchoscopic navigation for PPLs with GGO were retrospectively reviewed between June 2014 and May 2020. Cryobiopsy was introduced at our institution in June 2017. Patients who underwent only conventional biopsy (forceps and/or needle aspiration) between June 2014 and May 2017 were classified as the conventional group, whereas those who underwent cryobiopsy with or without conventional biopsy between June 2017 and May 2020 were categorized as the \"cryo\" group. The diagnostic performance of the two groups was compared using propensity score-matched analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 553 cases were identified, including 250 and 303 in the cryo and conventional groups, respectively. Propensity scoring was implemented to match lesion characteristics and intraprocedural findings, leading to the selection of 232 pairs of cases for each matched (m) group. The diagnostic yield in the m-cryo group was significantly higher than that in the m-conventional group [88.8% <i>vs.</i> 63.8%, odds ratio: 4.50 (95% confidence interval: 2.76-7.33), P<0.001]. Although the incidence of grade 2 and 3 bleeding in the m-cryo group was higher than that in the m-conventional group (40.5% <i>vs.</i> 8.6% and 2.6% <i>vs.</i> 0.4%, respectively; P<0.001), grade 4 bleeding was not reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined use of cryobiopsy provides improved diagnostic yield for PPLs with GGO compared with conventional biopsy methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) with ground-glass opacity (GGO) are generally difficult to diagnose via bronchoscopy. Cryobiopsy, a recently introduced technique, provides quantitatively and qualitatively superior tissues compared with conventional biopsy methods and can improve diagnostic outcomes. However, its diagnostic accuracy has not been specifically investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether the combined use of cryobiopsy improves the diagnostic yield for PPLs with GGO.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent bronchoscopy combined with radial endobronchial ultrasound and virtual bronchoscopic navigation for PPLs with GGO were retrospectively reviewed between June 2014 and May 2020. Cryobiopsy was introduced at our institution in June 2017. Patients who underwent only conventional biopsy (forceps and/or needle aspiration) between June 2014 and May 2017 were classified as the conventional group, whereas those who underwent cryobiopsy with or without conventional biopsy between June 2017 and May 2020 were categorized as the "cryo" group. The diagnostic performance of the two groups was compared using propensity score-matched analysis.

Results: Overall, 553 cases were identified, including 250 and 303 in the cryo and conventional groups, respectively. Propensity scoring was implemented to match lesion characteristics and intraprocedural findings, leading to the selection of 232 pairs of cases for each matched (m) group. The diagnostic yield in the m-cryo group was significantly higher than that in the m-conventional group [88.8% vs. 63.8%, odds ratio: 4.50 (95% confidence interval: 2.76-7.33), P<0.001]. Although the incidence of grade 2 and 3 bleeding in the m-cryo group was higher than that in the m-conventional group (40.5% vs. 8.6% and 2.6% vs. 0.4%, respectively; P<0.001), grade 4 bleeding was not reported.

Conclusions: The combined use of cryobiopsy provides improved diagnostic yield for PPLs with GGO compared with conventional biopsy methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冷冻活组织切片检查对伴有磨玻璃不透明的外周肺部病变的诊断效果:倾向得分匹配分析。
背景:伴有磨玻璃不透明(GGO)的周围肺部病变(PPL)通常很难通过支气管镜诊断。冷冻活检是最近引入的一种技术,与传统活检方法相比,它能提供定量和定性的优质组织,并能改善诊断结果。然而,其诊断准确性尚未得到专门研究。因此,本研究旨在确定联合使用冷冻活检是否能提高 PPL 与 GGO 的诊断率:回顾性研究了 2014 年 6 月至 2020 年 5 月间接受支气管镜联合径向支气管内超声和虚拟支气管镜导航治疗 PPL 伴 GGO 的连续患者。我院于 2017 年 6 月引入冷冻活检术。在2014年6月至2017年5月期间仅接受常规活检(钳取和/或针吸)的患者被归为常规组,而在2017年6月至2020年5月期间接受冷冻活检并进行或不进行常规活检的患者被归为 "冷冻 "组。通过倾向得分匹配分析比较了两组的诊断效果:共发现553例病例,其中冷冻组和传统组分别为250例和303例。为匹配病变特征和术中发现,采用倾向评分法为每个匹配(m)组选择了 232 对病例。m冷冻组的诊断率明显高于m常规组[88.8% vs. 63.8%,几率比:4.50(95%置信区间:2.76-7.33),Pvs.分别为8.6%和2.6% vs. 0.4%;PC结论:与传统活检方法相比,联合使用低温生物切片检查可提高PPL与GGO的诊断率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.
期刊最新文献
EGFR mutations in patients with lung adenocarcinoma and malignant pleural effusion: a propensity score-matched analysis of a single-center database. TFAP2A-activated ITGB4 promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression and inhibits CD4+/CD8+ T-cell infiltrations by targeting NF-κB signaling pathway. A multi-level investigation of the genetic relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and lung cancer. ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor intrinsic resistance due to de novo MET-amplification in metastatic ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer effectively treated by alectinib-crizotinib combination-case report. Association between fruit intake and non-small cell lung cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1