Early minimally invasive image-guided endoscopic evacuation of intracerebral hemorrhage (EMINENT-ICH): a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08534-7
Tim Jonas Hallenberger, Urs Fischer, Leo Hermann Bonati, Gilles Dutilh, Rosine Mucklow, Andrea Sarti Vogt, Claudia Boeni-Eckstein, Andrea Cardia, Gerrit A Schubert, Phillipe Bijlenga, Mahmoud Messerer, Andreas Raabe, Kevin Akeret, Christian Zweifel, Jens Kuhle, Alex Alfieri, Jean-Yves Fournier, Javier Fandino, Isabel Charlotte Hostettler, Ulf Christoph Schneider, Raphael Guzman, Jehuda Soleman
{"title":"Early minimally invasive image-guided endoscopic evacuation of intracerebral hemorrhage (EMINENT-ICH): a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Tim Jonas Hallenberger, Urs Fischer, Leo Hermann Bonati, Gilles Dutilh, Rosine Mucklow, Andrea Sarti Vogt, Claudia Boeni-Eckstein, Andrea Cardia, Gerrit A Schubert, Phillipe Bijlenga, Mahmoud Messerer, Andreas Raabe, Kevin Akeret, Christian Zweifel, Jens Kuhle, Alex Alfieri, Jean-Yves Fournier, Javier Fandino, Isabel Charlotte Hostettler, Ulf Christoph Schneider, Raphael Guzman, Jehuda Soleman","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08534-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage is the deadliest form of stroke with mortality rates over 50%. Currently, no sufficiently effective treatment to improve both mortality and functional outcome rates exists. However, it seems that minimally invasive surgery, especially endoscopic surgery, might be beneficial in improving survival and functional outcome rates, yet large confirmatory studies thereof are lacking. The aim of this trial is to compare whether early minimally invasive endoscopic surgery leads to improved functional outcome rates compared to the best medical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, parallel-arm, outcome assessor blinded multicenter trial across Switzerland. Endoscopic surgery will be compared to the best medical treatment in a 1:1 randomization over a total time of 12 months. The primary outcome is defined as improved functional outcome (mRS < 3) after 6 months; secondary outcomes include mortality and morbidity rates as well as patient reported outcomes and the temporal evolution of serum biomarkers for brain damage.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Currently, large, randomized trials assessing the role and potential effect of early endoscopic surgery in intracerebral hemorrhage are lacking. Potential practical and methodological issues faced in this trial are patient enrollment, adherence to the hematoma evacuation technique used, potential patient cross-over, and the adaptive Bayesian statistical design. Nonetheless, this trial would be among the first to research the effects of early minimally invasive endoscopic surgery for SSICH and can provide class I evidence for future treatment options in intracerebral hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05681988. Registered on January 3, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08534-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage is the deadliest form of stroke with mortality rates over 50%. Currently, no sufficiently effective treatment to improve both mortality and functional outcome rates exists. However, it seems that minimally invasive surgery, especially endoscopic surgery, might be beneficial in improving survival and functional outcome rates, yet large confirmatory studies thereof are lacking. The aim of this trial is to compare whether early minimally invasive endoscopic surgery leads to improved functional outcome rates compared to the best medical treatment.

Methods: This is a prospective, parallel-arm, outcome assessor blinded multicenter trial across Switzerland. Endoscopic surgery will be compared to the best medical treatment in a 1:1 randomization over a total time of 12 months. The primary outcome is defined as improved functional outcome (mRS < 3) after 6 months; secondary outcomes include mortality and morbidity rates as well as patient reported outcomes and the temporal evolution of serum biomarkers for brain damage.

Discussion: Currently, large, randomized trials assessing the role and potential effect of early endoscopic surgery in intracerebral hemorrhage are lacking. Potential practical and methodological issues faced in this trial are patient enrollment, adherence to the hematoma evacuation technique used, potential patient cross-over, and the adaptive Bayesian statistical design. Nonetheless, this trial would be among the first to research the effects of early minimally invasive endoscopic surgery for SSICH and can provide class I evidence for future treatment options in intracerebral hemorrhage.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05681988. Registered on January 3, 2023.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期微创影像引导内镜下脑出血抽吸术(EMINENT-ICH):随机对照试验。
背景:自发性幕上脑内出血是最致命的中风形式,死亡率超过 50%。目前,还没有足够有效的治疗方法能同时改善死亡率和功能预后。不过,微创手术,尤其是内窥镜手术,似乎可能有利于提高存活率和功能预后率,但目前还缺乏相关的大型确证研究。本试验旨在比较早期内镜微创手术与最佳内科治疗相比是否能提高功能预后率:这是一项前瞻性、平行臂、结果评估者盲法的瑞士多中心试验。内窥镜手术与最佳药物治疗将以1:1的随机比例进行比较,总疗程为12个月。主要结果定义为功能改善(mRS 讨论):目前,还缺乏评估早期内镜手术在脑出血中的作用和潜在效果的大型随机试验。本试验面临的潜在实际问题和方法问题包括:患者入组、血肿清除技术的坚持、潜在的患者交叉以及适应性贝叶斯统计设计。尽管如此,这项试验将是首批研究早期微创内镜手术治疗 SSICH 效果的试验之一,并能为未来脑出血的治疗方案提供 I 类证据:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05681988。注册日期:2023 年 1 月 3 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a patient health engagement (PHE) model on rehabilitation participation in patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Evaluating effects of meal delivery on the ability of homebound older adults to remain in the community via a pragmatic, two-arm, randomized comparative effectiveness trial: study protocol for the Deliver-EE trial. Prochlorperazine maleate versus placebo for the prevention of acute mountain sickness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Interventions to modify the habituation of biological responses to repeated stress in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial. Integrating habit science and learning theory to promote maintenance of behavior change: does adding text messages to a habit-based sleep health intervention (HABITs) improve outcomes for eveningness chronotype young adults? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1