William Rioux, Dylan Viste, Stephanie Robertson, Linzi Williamson, Anne Miller, Evan Poncelet, S Monty Ghosh
{"title":"Virtual/Mobile Overdose Response in Canada: A Social Return on Investment Analysis.","authors":"William Rioux, Dylan Viste, Stephanie Robertson, Linzi Williamson, Anne Miller, Evan Poncelet, S Monty Ghosh","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The overdose epidemic continues to be one of the leading causes of death in North America and continues to contribute to high healthcare costs. While harm reduction initiatives have significantly reduced the aforementioned costs, there is a dearth of evidence regarding overdose response hotlines and applications. We aim to evaluate the social return on investment (SROI) from a payer perspective of one such overdose response hotline, Canada's National Overdose Response Service, and its implications for service users, service operators, the Canadian healthcare system, and program funders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outcome variables determined from theory of change models were developed in consultation with the aforementioned vested interest groups. Proxy values were attributed to each variable identified through values present within existing literature and databases. These values were then compared to operational costs accounting for deadweight, attribution, and displacement to determine a final SROI ratio. A discount rate was then applied based on the influence of risk on the outcome achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ratio illustrating the value created for all stakeholders, resulting from the $1,592,00 investment made over two years, is $15.84 per single dollar invested. The value generated stems primarily from overdose prevention, mental health support, staff employment, reductions in emergency service utilization, service referrals, and volunteer well-being, which outweigh costs including operational funding, work-related stressors, compassion fatigue, and false calls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of our study demonstrate that the National Overdose Response Service provides a social value that far outweighs the costs attributed to the program's operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The overdose epidemic continues to be one of the leading causes of death in North America and continues to contribute to high healthcare costs. While harm reduction initiatives have significantly reduced the aforementioned costs, there is a dearth of evidence regarding overdose response hotlines and applications. We aim to evaluate the social return on investment (SROI) from a payer perspective of one such overdose response hotline, Canada's National Overdose Response Service, and its implications for service users, service operators, the Canadian healthcare system, and program funders.
Methods: Outcome variables determined from theory of change models were developed in consultation with the aforementioned vested interest groups. Proxy values were attributed to each variable identified through values present within existing literature and databases. These values were then compared to operational costs accounting for deadweight, attribution, and displacement to determine a final SROI ratio. A discount rate was then applied based on the influence of risk on the outcome achieved.
Results: The ratio illustrating the value created for all stakeholders, resulting from the $1,592,00 investment made over two years, is $15.84 per single dollar invested. The value generated stems primarily from overdose prevention, mental health support, staff employment, reductions in emergency service utilization, service referrals, and volunteer well-being, which outweigh costs including operational funding, work-related stressors, compassion fatigue, and false calls.
Conclusion: The results of our study demonstrate that the National Overdose Response Service provides a social value that far outweighs the costs attributed to the program's operation.
期刊介绍:
Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.