Can clinical guidelines reduce variation in transfusion practice? A pre-post study of blood transfusions during cardiac surgery.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Vox Sanguinis Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1111/vox.13751
Adam Irving, Anthony Harris, Dennis Petrie, Daniel Avdic, Julian Smith, Lavinia Tran, Christopher M Reid, Zoe K McQuilten
{"title":"Can clinical guidelines reduce variation in transfusion practice? A pre-post study of blood transfusions during cardiac surgery.","authors":"Adam Irving, Anthony Harris, Dennis Petrie, Daniel Avdic, Julian Smith, Lavinia Tran, Christopher M Reid, Zoe K McQuilten","doi":"10.1111/vox.13751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Previously published studies have consistently identified significant variation in red blood cell (RBC) transfusions during cardiac surgery. Clinical guidelines can be effective at improving the average quality of care; however, their impact on variation in practice is rarely studied. Herein, we estimated how variation in RBC use across cardiac surgeons changed after the publication of national patient blood management guidelines.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a pre-post study estimating change in variation in RBC transfusions across 80 cardiac surgeons in 29 hospitals using a national cardiac surgery registry. Variation across surgeons was estimated using fixed-effects regressions controlling for surgery and patient characteristics and an empirical Bayes shrinkage to adjust for sampling error. RBC use was measured by three metrics-the total number of units transfused, the proportion of patients transfused and the number of units transfused, conditional on receiving RBC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary analysis utilized 35,761 elective cardiac surgeries performed between March 2009 and February 2015 and identified a 24.5% reduction (p < 0.0001) in mean total units transfused accompanied by a 37.2% reduction (p = 0.040) in the variation across surgeons. The reduction in mean total units was driven by both the proportion of patients transfused and the number of units transfused, conditional on receiving RBC, while the reduction in variation was only driven by the latter.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study of RBC transfusions across cardiac surgeons, the surgeons who used more RBC in the pre-guideline period experienced larger reductions in RBC use after the guidelines were published.</p>","PeriodicalId":23631,"journal":{"name":"Vox Sanguinis","volume":" ","pages":"47-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Sanguinis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Previously published studies have consistently identified significant variation in red blood cell (RBC) transfusions during cardiac surgery. Clinical guidelines can be effective at improving the average quality of care; however, their impact on variation in practice is rarely studied. Herein, we estimated how variation in RBC use across cardiac surgeons changed after the publication of national patient blood management guidelines.

Materials and methods: We performed a pre-post study estimating change in variation in RBC transfusions across 80 cardiac surgeons in 29 hospitals using a national cardiac surgery registry. Variation across surgeons was estimated using fixed-effects regressions controlling for surgery and patient characteristics and an empirical Bayes shrinkage to adjust for sampling error. RBC use was measured by three metrics-the total number of units transfused, the proportion of patients transfused and the number of units transfused, conditional on receiving RBC.

Results: The primary analysis utilized 35,761 elective cardiac surgeries performed between March 2009 and February 2015 and identified a 24.5% reduction (p < 0.0001) in mean total units transfused accompanied by a 37.2% reduction (p = 0.040) in the variation across surgeons. The reduction in mean total units was driven by both the proportion of patients transfused and the number of units transfused, conditional on receiving RBC, while the reduction in variation was only driven by the latter.

Conclusion: In our study of RBC transfusions across cardiac surgeons, the surgeons who used more RBC in the pre-guideline period experienced larger reductions in RBC use after the guidelines were published.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床指南能否减少输血实践中的差异?心脏手术中输血的前后对比研究。
背景和目的:之前发表的研究一致发现,心脏手术中的红细胞(RBC)输注存在显著差异。临床指南可以有效提高平均护理质量,但很少有人研究过它们对实践中的差异产生的影响。在此,我们估算了国家患者血液管理指南发布后,心脏外科医生在使用红细胞方面的差异是如何变化的:我们进行了一项前后期研究,利用全国心脏外科登记册估算了 29 家医院 80 名心脏外科医生输注 RBC 的差异变化。我们使用固定效应回归法估算了不同外科医生之间的差异,该回归法控制了手术和患者特征,并使用经验贝叶斯收缩法调整了抽样误差。RBC的使用通过三个指标来衡量--输血单位总数、患者输血比例和接受RBC条件下的输血单位数:主要分析利用了 2009 年 3 月至 2015 年 2 月期间进行的 35,761 例择期心脏手术,结果发现输血量减少了 24.5%(p 结论:我们的研究发现,输注 RBC 的患者比例在 2009 年 3 月至 2015 年 2 月期间下降了 20.5%:在我们对各心脏外科医生输注 RBC 的情况进行的研究中,在指南发布前使用 RBC 较多的外科医生在指南发布后使用 RBC 的减少幅度较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vox Sanguinis
Vox Sanguinis 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
156
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vox Sanguinis reports on important, novel developments in transfusion medicine. Original papers, reviews and international fora are published on all aspects of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, comprising five main sections: 1) Transfusion - Transmitted Disease and its Prevention: Identification and epidemiology of infectious agents transmissible by blood; Bacterial contamination of blood components; Donor recruitment and selection methods; Pathogen inactivation. 2) Blood Component Collection and Production: Blood collection methods and devices (including apheresis); Plasma fractionation techniques and plasma derivatives; Preparation of labile blood components; Inventory management; Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and storage; Collection and storage of tissues; Quality management and good manufacturing practice; Automation and information technology. 3) Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies: Transfusion thresholds and audits; Haemovigilance; Clinical trials regarding appropriate haemotherapy; Non-infectious adverse affects of transfusion; Therapeutic apheresis; Support of transplant patients; Gene therapy and immunotherapy. 4) Immunohaematology and Immunogenetics: Autoimmunity in haematology; Alloimmunity of blood; Pre-transfusion testing; Immunodiagnostics; Immunobiology; Complement in immunohaematology; Blood typing reagents; Genetic markers of blood cells and serum proteins: polymorphisms and function; Genetic markers and disease; Parentage testing and forensic immunohaematology. 5) Cellular Therapy: Cell-based therapies; Stem cell sources; Stem cell processing and storage; Stem cell products; Stem cell plasticity; Regenerative medicine with cells; Cellular immunotherapy; Molecular therapy; Gene therapy.
期刊最新文献
Use of immunoglobulin G homeostatic set point and recovery time in plasmapheresis donor safety monitoring: A retrospective observational cohort study. An experimental comparison and user evaluation of three different dried plasma products. Artificial intelligence and transfusion education, research and practice: The view from the ISBT Clinical Transfusion Working Party. Transfusion efficacy of leucoreduced packed red blood cells prepared by two different methods: A randomized controlled trial in transfusion-dependent thalassaemia patients (FUEL trial). Notification of blood donors who test positive for transfusion-transmissible infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1