The potential benefits of extra screening for glycated haemoglobin, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on donor health management and retention.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Vox Sanguinis Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1111/vox.13749
Wen-Jie Liu, Yun-Yuan Chen, Jen-Wei Chen, Chih-Hung Lin, Sheng-Tang Wei, Sheng-Mou Hou
{"title":"The potential benefits of extra screening for glycated haemoglobin, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on donor health management and retention.","authors":"Wen-Jie Liu, Yun-Yuan Chen, Jen-Wei Chen, Chih-Hung Lin, Sheng-Tang Wei, Sheng-Mou Hou","doi":"10.1111/vox.13749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>An extra health screening, including glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), was initiated for regular donors aged over 40 in Taiwan in November 2015. This study aimed to determine its benefits on donor health management and retention.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A stratified random mail survey was conducted among donors who received HbA1c, TC and LDL-C screening between November 2015 and June 2017 to investigate their awareness of the screening, medical histories and post-screening behaviours. Their subsequent screening results and donation records from 3 years before and after the initial screening were obtained up to December 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2070 donors participated in the mail survey, with participation rates ranging 15.7%-23.2% across study groups. The screening newly detected hyperglycaemia in 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2%-2.0%) and hyperlipidaemia in 1.0% (95% CI: 0.7%-1.4%) of participants, with 42.7% (95% CI: 40.3%-45.2%) of participants unaware of the screening. Participants with initially abnormal or borderline TC or LDL-C results showed significant decreases in the subsequent screening (all p values<0.05). No difference was found in participants' awareness of the screening. However, those who sought medical consultation or made specific lifestyle changes tended to show greater improvements. Awareness of the screening was associated with increased whole blood donations and donated units.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The extra health screening has limited benefits for donor health management without additional interventions, but it may motivate donors to donate more frequently. Raising donors' awareness of the screening is also crucial to maximize its benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":23631,"journal":{"name":"Vox Sanguinis","volume":" ","pages":"13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Sanguinis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13749","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: An extra health screening, including glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), was initiated for regular donors aged over 40 in Taiwan in November 2015. This study aimed to determine its benefits on donor health management and retention.

Materials and methods: A stratified random mail survey was conducted among donors who received HbA1c, TC and LDL-C screening between November 2015 and June 2017 to investigate their awareness of the screening, medical histories and post-screening behaviours. Their subsequent screening results and donation records from 3 years before and after the initial screening were obtained up to December 2021.

Results: In total, 2070 donors participated in the mail survey, with participation rates ranging 15.7%-23.2% across study groups. The screening newly detected hyperglycaemia in 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2%-2.0%) and hyperlipidaemia in 1.0% (95% CI: 0.7%-1.4%) of participants, with 42.7% (95% CI: 40.3%-45.2%) of participants unaware of the screening. Participants with initially abnormal or borderline TC or LDL-C results showed significant decreases in the subsequent screening (all p values<0.05). No difference was found in participants' awareness of the screening. However, those who sought medical consultation or made specific lifestyle changes tended to show greater improvements. Awareness of the screening was associated with increased whole blood donations and donated units.

Conclusion: The extra health screening has limited benefits for donor health management without additional interventions, but it may motivate donors to donate more frequently. Raising donors' awareness of the screening is also crucial to maximize its benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
额外筛查糖化血红蛋白、总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇对捐献者健康管理和保留的潜在益处。
背景和目的:2015年11月,台湾开始对40岁以上的定期捐献者进行额外的健康检查,包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、总胆固醇(TC)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)。本研究旨在确定其对捐献者健康管理和保留的益处:对 2015 年 11 月至 2017 年 6 月期间接受 HbA1c、TC 和 LDL-C 筛查的捐献者进行了分层随机邮件调查,以了解他们对筛查的认知、病史和筛查后的行为。他们随后的筛查结果和首次筛查前后 3 年的捐献记录被收集至 2021 年 12 月:共有 2070 名捐献者参与了邮寄调查,各研究组的参与率为 15.7%-23.2%。筛查新发现高血糖的参与者占 1.6%(95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.2%-2.0%),高血脂的参与者占 1.0%(95% 置信区间:0.7%-1.4%),42.7%(95% 置信区间:40.3%-45.2%)的参与者不知道筛查。最初 TC 或 LDL-C 结果异常或接近异常的参与者在随后的筛查中显著下降(所有 p 值):如果不采取额外的干预措施,额外的健康筛查对捐献者健康管理的益处有限,但它可以激励捐献者更频繁地进行捐献。提高捐献者对筛查的认识对于最大限度地发挥筛查的益处也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vox Sanguinis
Vox Sanguinis 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
156
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vox Sanguinis reports on important, novel developments in transfusion medicine. Original papers, reviews and international fora are published on all aspects of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, comprising five main sections: 1) Transfusion - Transmitted Disease and its Prevention: Identification and epidemiology of infectious agents transmissible by blood; Bacterial contamination of blood components; Donor recruitment and selection methods; Pathogen inactivation. 2) Blood Component Collection and Production: Blood collection methods and devices (including apheresis); Plasma fractionation techniques and plasma derivatives; Preparation of labile blood components; Inventory management; Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and storage; Collection and storage of tissues; Quality management and good manufacturing practice; Automation and information technology. 3) Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies: Transfusion thresholds and audits; Haemovigilance; Clinical trials regarding appropriate haemotherapy; Non-infectious adverse affects of transfusion; Therapeutic apheresis; Support of transplant patients; Gene therapy and immunotherapy. 4) Immunohaematology and Immunogenetics: Autoimmunity in haematology; Alloimmunity of blood; Pre-transfusion testing; Immunodiagnostics; Immunobiology; Complement in immunohaematology; Blood typing reagents; Genetic markers of blood cells and serum proteins: polymorphisms and function; Genetic markers and disease; Parentage testing and forensic immunohaematology. 5) Cellular Therapy: Cell-based therapies; Stem cell sources; Stem cell processing and storage; Stem cell products; Stem cell plasticity; Regenerative medicine with cells; Cellular immunotherapy; Molecular therapy; Gene therapy.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of communication interventions for promoting blood donation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Donors in the COVID-19 era: How did donor characteristics change in Japan? Is there a need for an alternative source of red blood cells for clinical transfusion and will gene-edited pigs fulfil that need? Use of immunoglobulin G homeostatic set point and recovery time in plasmapheresis donor safety monitoring: A retrospective observational cohort study. An experimental comparison and user evaluation of three different dried plasma products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1