Examining the controversies in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for vascular surgery patients: A critical review

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Vascular pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.vph.2024.107436
{"title":"Examining the controversies in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for vascular surgery patients: A critical review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.vph.2024.107436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant concern in vascular surgery due to its potentially severe consequences. Effective prophylactic measures are essential to minimize the risks associated with VTE. However, considerable controversy remains regarding the optimal strategies for VTE prevention in patients undergoing vascular procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This review critically analyzes key clinical research, guidelines, and expert opinions to explore the advantages and limitations of various VTE prophylaxis approaches. The pharmacological and mechanical methods are explored, with a focus on balancing the risk of VTE against the potential for bleeding complications, particularly in high-risk patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The review addresses controversial issues such as the choice of anticoagulants, dosage, timing, and duration of prophylaxis. The lack of consensus in existing guidelines and the variability in clinical practice regarding VTE prevention in vascular surgery patients is highlighted. The role of patient-specific risk factors, including the use of intraoperative anticoagulation and bleeding risks, is also examined.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of VTE prophylaxis strategies in vascular surgery, emphasizing the need for individualized, evidence-based approaches. Clarifying these controversies is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing both thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23949,"journal":{"name":"Vascular pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1537189124001629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant concern in vascular surgery due to its potentially severe consequences. Effective prophylactic measures are essential to minimize the risks associated with VTE. However, considerable controversy remains regarding the optimal strategies for VTE prevention in patients undergoing vascular procedures.

Methods

This review critically analyzes key clinical research, guidelines, and expert opinions to explore the advantages and limitations of various VTE prophylaxis approaches. The pharmacological and mechanical methods are explored, with a focus on balancing the risk of VTE against the potential for bleeding complications, particularly in high-risk patients.

Results

The review addresses controversial issues such as the choice of anticoagulants, dosage, timing, and duration of prophylaxis. The lack of consensus in existing guidelines and the variability in clinical practice regarding VTE prevention in vascular surgery patients is highlighted. The role of patient-specific risk factors, including the use of intraoperative anticoagulation and bleeding risks, is also examined.

Conclusion

This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of VTE prophylaxis strategies in vascular surgery, emphasizing the need for individualized, evidence-based approaches. Clarifying these controversies is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing both thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨血管手术患者静脉血栓栓塞预防的争议:重要综述。
背景:静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)因其潜在的严重后果而备受血管外科关注。有效的预防措施是将 VTE 相关风险降至最低的关键。然而,关于血管手术患者预防 VTE 的最佳策略仍存在相当大的争议:本综述对主要临床研究、指南和专家意见进行了批判性分析,探讨了各种 VTE 预防方法的优势和局限性。方法:这篇综述批判性地分析了关键的临床研究、指南和专家意见,探讨了各种 VTE 预防方法的优势和局限性,探讨了药物和机械方法,重点是平衡 VTE 风险和潜在的出血并发症,尤其是在高危患者中:结果:综述探讨了一些有争议的问题,如抗凝剂的选择、剂量、时间和预防持续时间。结果:综述探讨了抗凝药物的选择、剂量、时间和预防持续时间等有争议的问题,强调了现有指南在预防血管外科患者 VTE 方面缺乏共识以及临床实践中的差异性。此外,还探讨了患者特异性风险因素的作用,包括术中使用抗凝药物和出血风险:本综述对血管外科的 VTE 预防策略进行了全面评估,强调了个体化、循证方法的必要性。澄清这些争议对于优化患者预后、减少血栓和出血并发症至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular pharmacology
Vascular pharmacology 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Vascular Pharmacology publishes papers, which contains results of all aspects of biology and pharmacology of the vascular system. Papers are encouraged in basic, translational and clinical aspects of Vascular Biology and Pharmacology, utilizing approaches ranging from molecular biology to integrative physiology. All papers are in English. The Journal publishes review articles which include vascular aspects of thrombosis, inflammation, cell signalling, atherosclerosis, and lipid metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Functional characterization of human IL-8 in vascular stenosis using a novel humanized transgenic mouse model Lack of AMP-activated protein kinase-α1 reduces nitric oxide synthesis in thoracic aorta perivascular adipose tissue Different gene expression patterns between mouse and human brain pericytes revealed by single-cell/nucleus RNA sequencing Bioactive lipids improve serum HDL and PON1 activities in coronary artery disease patients: Ex-vivo study Examining the controversies in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for vascular surgery patients: A critical review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1