Fixation of adult femoral neck fractures: Retrospective comparison between cannulated screws and femoral neck system (FNS).

E Guillén Botaya, Á Soler García, J L Aparicio Martínez, A Tejeda Gómez, F Segura Llopis, A Silvestre Muñoz
{"title":"Fixation of adult femoral neck fractures: Retrospective comparison between cannulated screws and femoral neck system (FNS).","authors":"E Guillén Botaya, Á Soler García, J L Aparicio Martínez, A Tejeda Gómez, F Segura Llopis, A Silvestre Muñoz","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The FNS System DePuy Synthes® (EEUU, 2018) represents a recent alternative treatment for the fixation of femoral neck fractures, providing biomechanical advantages with respect to cannulated screws (3 CS). The objective of this study is to compare the clinical results of both fixation methods.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective collection of the 36 subcapital fractures treated with the FNS system was carried out compared with a retrospective search of the last 35 patients treated with 3 CS. Age, sex, fracture pattern, delay until the intervention, length of intervention, hospital length stay, and haemoglobin loss were analyzed. In addition, the rate of avascular necrosis, nonunion, symptomatic femoral neck shortening, and material protrusion with or without its removal were recorded during a minimum follow-up of 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in age (p-value 0.32), fracture patterns (p-value 0.77), surgical delay (p-value 0.28), surgical time (p-value 0.226), length of hospital stay (p-value 0.921) and blood loss (p-value 0.086) between the two groups. A significantly higher overall complication rate was observed in the group treated with cannulated screws (p-value 0.004). Analysed separately, a higher rate of avascular necrosis, symptomatic shortening of the femoral neck, protrusion of the osteosynthesis material with or without removal was observed in the group treated with cannulated screws.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FNS system represents a safe and reproductible alternative for the fixation of femoral neck fractures, showing non-inferior outcomes to treatment with cannulated screws.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.10.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The FNS System DePuy Synthes® (EEUU, 2018) represents a recent alternative treatment for the fixation of femoral neck fractures, providing biomechanical advantages with respect to cannulated screws (3 CS). The objective of this study is to compare the clinical results of both fixation methods.

Method: A retrospective collection of the 36 subcapital fractures treated with the FNS system was carried out compared with a retrospective search of the last 35 patients treated with 3 CS. Age, sex, fracture pattern, delay until the intervention, length of intervention, hospital length stay, and haemoglobin loss were analyzed. In addition, the rate of avascular necrosis, nonunion, symptomatic femoral neck shortening, and material protrusion with or without its removal were recorded during a minimum follow-up of 6 months.

Results: No significant differences were found in age (p-value 0.32), fracture patterns (p-value 0.77), surgical delay (p-value 0.28), surgical time (p-value 0.226), length of hospital stay (p-value 0.921) and blood loss (p-value 0.086) between the two groups. A significantly higher overall complication rate was observed in the group treated with cannulated screws (p-value 0.004). Analysed separately, a higher rate of avascular necrosis, symptomatic shortening of the femoral neck, protrusion of the osteosynthesis material with or without removal was observed in the group treated with cannulated screws.

Conclusions: The FNS system represents a safe and reproductible alternative for the fixation of femoral neck fractures, showing non-inferior outcomes to treatment with cannulated screws.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人股骨颈骨折的固定:套管螺钉与股骨颈系统(FNS)的回顾性比较。
目的:FNS 系统 DePuy Synthes® (EEUU, 2018) 是最近用于股骨颈骨折固定的一种替代疗法,与套管螺钉(3CS)相比具有生物力学优势。本研究旨在比较两种固定方法的临床效果:方法:对使用 FNS 系统治疗的 36 例股骨颈下骨折患者进行回顾性收集,并与使用 3CS 治疗的最后 35 例患者进行回顾性检索。分析了患者的年龄、性别、骨折类型、介入治疗延迟时间、介入治疗时间、住院时间和血红蛋白损失。此外,在至少 6 个月的随访期间,还记录了发生血管性坏死、骨折不愈合、无症状股骨颈缩短以及材料突出(无论是否移除)的比率:两组患者在年龄(P 值 0.32)、骨折类型(P 值 0.77)、手术延迟(P 值 0.28)、手术时间(P 值 0.226)、住院时间(P 值 0.921)和失血量(P 值 0.086)方面均无明显差异。使用套管螺钉治疗组的总体并发症发生率明显更高(P 值为 0.004)。分别分析发现,使用套管螺钉治疗组的血管性坏死、股骨颈无症状缩短、骨合成材料突出(无论是否移除)的发生率较高:FNS系统是股骨颈骨折固定的一种安全、可重复的替代方法,其疗效不逊于带壳螺钉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
期刊最新文献
Digital Orthopaedic Surgery: Benefits and challenges of extended reality and spatial computing. Ramón y Cajal and the Cartilaginous Growth Plate. [Translated article] New times, identical objectives. Correspondence "Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in traumatology: Conversational answers to specific questions". Does plate fixation improve the Latarjet procedure for anterior glenohumeral instability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1