Comparison of the effectiveness of modafinil and methylphenidate in treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with Parkinson's disease.

IF 0.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Current Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.18502/cjn.v23i1.16431
Ahmad Chitsaz, Mohammad Reza Najafi, Farzaneh Habibi, Sajad Amirhajloo
{"title":"Comparison of the effectiveness of modafinil and methylphenidate in treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Ahmad Chitsaz, Mohammad Reza Najafi, Farzaneh Habibi, Sajad Amirhajloo","doi":"10.18502/cjn.v23i1.16431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> A large percentage of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) suffer from excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). This study aims to compare the effectiveness of modafinil and methylphenidate on EDS and side effects. <b>Methods:</b> Fifty nine patients with PD and EDS [Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) more than 9] were recruited in a double-blind placebo controlled trial. Twenty-two patients received modafinil 200 mg daily, twenty-six patients received methylphenidate 10 mg daily, and 11 patients received placebo for 6 weeks. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and ESS were filled out at baseline and 6 weeks later. <b>Results:</b> There was no significant difference in demographics, PSQI, and ESS variables at baseline. The mean of ESS scores decreased significantly in modafinil (17.36 ± 5.05 vs. 10.55 ± 4.62, P <b><</b> 0.001<b>)</b> and methylphenidate (16.27 ± 5.40 vs. 12.23 ± 6.28, P < 0.001) groups after 6-week trial, compared with control group (14.27 ± 4.49 vs. 14.09 ± 4.46, P = 0.710). The effectiveness of modafinil and methylphenidate on improving daytime sleepiness and night sleep of patients was not significantly different. <b>Conclusion:</b> Both modafinil and methylphenidate were effective drugs in improving EDS and quality of sleep without significant difference in efficiency and side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":40077,"journal":{"name":"Current Journal of Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v23i1.16431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A large percentage of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) suffer from excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). This study aims to compare the effectiveness of modafinil and methylphenidate on EDS and side effects. Methods: Fifty nine patients with PD and EDS [Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) more than 9] were recruited in a double-blind placebo controlled trial. Twenty-two patients received modafinil 200 mg daily, twenty-six patients received methylphenidate 10 mg daily, and 11 patients received placebo for 6 weeks. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and ESS were filled out at baseline and 6 weeks later. Results: There was no significant difference in demographics, PSQI, and ESS variables at baseline. The mean of ESS scores decreased significantly in modafinil (17.36 ± 5.05 vs. 10.55 ± 4.62, P < 0.001) and methylphenidate (16.27 ± 5.40 vs. 12.23 ± 6.28, P < 0.001) groups after 6-week trial, compared with control group (14.27 ± 4.49 vs. 14.09 ± 4.46, P = 0.710). The effectiveness of modafinil and methylphenidate on improving daytime sleepiness and night sleep of patients was not significantly different. Conclusion: Both modafinil and methylphenidate were effective drugs in improving EDS and quality of sleep without significant difference in efficiency and side effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较莫达非尼和哌醋甲酯治疗帕金森病患者白天过度嗜睡的效果。
背景:很大一部分帕金森病(PD)患者患有白天过度嗜睡症(EDS)。本研究旨在比较莫达非尼和哌醋甲酯对 EDS 的疗效和副作用。研究方法在一项双盲安慰剂对照试验中,招募了59名患有帕金森氏症和EDS(埃普沃斯嗜睡量表(ESS)大于9)的患者。22名患者每天服用莫达非尼200毫克,26名患者每天服用哌醋甲酯10毫克,11名患者服用安慰剂6周。在基线和6周后填写匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和ESS。结果显示基线时的人口统计学、PSQI 和 ESS 变量无明显差异。与对照组(14.27 ± 4.49 vs. 14.09 ± 4.46,P = 0.710)相比,莫达非尼组(17.36 ± 5.05 vs. 10.55 ± 4.62,P 0.001)和哌醋甲酯组(16.27 ± 5.40 vs. 12.23 ± 6.28,P < 0.001)的ESS平均分在6周后明显下降。莫达非尼和哌醋甲酯对改善患者白天嗜睡和夜间睡眠的效果没有显著差异。结论莫达非尼和哌醋甲酯都是改善EDS和睡眠质量的有效药物,在效率和副作用方面没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Journal of Neurology
Current Journal of Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sequential changes in expression of long non-coding RNAs THRIL and MALAT1 after ischemic stroke. Tinnitus and reduced word recognition with a bilateral inferior colliculus infarction after cerebellar arteriovenous malformation embolization. Validity and reliability of the Iranian-developed version of the leisure questionnaire for people with multiple sclerosis: Psychometric properties. A study on possible risk factors for progressive supranuclear palsy in southern part of India. Anticoagulation in the management of septic cavernous sinus thrombosis secondary to rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis: A retrospective real-world experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1