Evidence Synthesis for the Development of National Nursing-Sensitive Indicators in Malaysia: A Literature Review and Stakeholder Engagement Approach.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608241286426
Devi Shantini Rata Mohan, Nurul Iman Jamalul-Lail, Diane Woei-Quan Chong, Kalvina Chelladorai, Kartiekasari Syahidda Mohammad Zubairi, Inin Roslyza Rusli, Nur Azmiah Zainuddin, Roslina Supadi, Noor Hasidah Ab Rahman, Mariyah Mohamad, Devi K Saravana Muthu, Gowry Narayanan, Cheah Jenny
{"title":"Evidence Synthesis for the Development of National Nursing-Sensitive Indicators in Malaysia: A Literature Review and Stakeholder Engagement Approach.","authors":"Devi Shantini Rata Mohan, Nurul Iman Jamalul-Lail, Diane Woei-Quan Chong, Kalvina Chelladorai, Kartiekasari Syahidda Mohammad Zubairi, Inin Roslyza Rusli, Nur Azmiah Zainuddin, Roslina Supadi, Noor Hasidah Ab Rahman, Mariyah Mohamad, Devi K Saravana Muthu, Gowry Narayanan, Cheah Jenny","doi":"10.1177/23779608241286426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nursing-sensitive indicators measure and evaluate nursing care quality and its contribution to patient care. The identification of indicators that demonstrate nursing care contribution and the quality of care delivered locally is of paramount importance, and national indicators that demonstrate this are essential. This paper aims to provide an evidence base of nursing-sensitive indicators that can facilitate the conceptualization of local nursing national indicators.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A multifaceted and iterative approach incorporating literature review, and stakeholder engagements was utilized in evidence synthesis. A review of indicators present internationally complemented by the inclusion of context-specific local NSIs through stakeholder engagements was performed. Secondary data analysis of documents from an environmental scan was also included to highlight areas of concern for nursing-sensitive indicator prioritization from the viewpoint of nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 articles were reviewed and indicators were coded according to the Nursing Care Performance Framework subsystems, dimensions, and variables. All papers reviewed had documented outcome indicators. From our secondary data analysis, nurses identified areas of concern such as nursing staff supply, staff maintenance, nursing processes and risk outcomes, and safety to be prioritized for developing quality indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This paper provides a list of NSIs coded systematically with definitions to aid stakeholders in prioritizing indicators for national indicator development. The inclusion of areas of concern provides insight into NSIs that nurse practitioners find relevant to the local context. To our knowledge, this is the first paper that includes evidence available in the literature and incorporates stakeholders' perspectives in synthesizing evidence needed to guide the development of national nursing indicators. This iterative approach is crucial because it enhances the likelihood of knowledge translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"10 ","pages":"23779608241286426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241286426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nursing-sensitive indicators measure and evaluate nursing care quality and its contribution to patient care. The identification of indicators that demonstrate nursing care contribution and the quality of care delivered locally is of paramount importance, and national indicators that demonstrate this are essential. This paper aims to provide an evidence base of nursing-sensitive indicators that can facilitate the conceptualization of local nursing national indicators.

Method: A multifaceted and iterative approach incorporating literature review, and stakeholder engagements was utilized in evidence synthesis. A review of indicators present internationally complemented by the inclusion of context-specific local NSIs through stakeholder engagements was performed. Secondary data analysis of documents from an environmental scan was also included to highlight areas of concern for nursing-sensitive indicator prioritization from the viewpoint of nurses.

Results: A total of 64 articles were reviewed and indicators were coded according to the Nursing Care Performance Framework subsystems, dimensions, and variables. All papers reviewed had documented outcome indicators. From our secondary data analysis, nurses identified areas of concern such as nursing staff supply, staff maintenance, nursing processes and risk outcomes, and safety to be prioritized for developing quality indicators.

Conclusion: This paper provides a list of NSIs coded systematically with definitions to aid stakeholders in prioritizing indicators for national indicator development. The inclusion of areas of concern provides insight into NSIs that nurse practitioners find relevant to the local context. To our knowledge, this is the first paper that includes evidence available in the literature and incorporates stakeholders' perspectives in synthesizing evidence needed to guide the development of national nursing indicators. This iterative approach is crucial because it enhances the likelihood of knowledge translation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚制定国家护理敏感指标的证据综述:文献综述与利益相关者参与方法》。
导言:护理敏感指标衡量和评估护理质量及其对病人护理的贡献。确定能够证明护理贡献和本地提供的护理质量的指标至关重要,而能够证明这一点的国家指标也必不可少。本文旨在提供对护理敏感的指标的证据基础,以促进当地护理国家指标的概念化:方法:在证据综合过程中采用了一种多方面的迭代方法,其中包括文献综述和利益相关者参与。对国际上现有的指标进行了审查,并通过利益相关者的参与,纳入了符合当地具体情况的国家护理指标。此外,还对环境扫描中的文件进行了二次数据分析,以便从护士的角度突出护理敏感指标优先次序的关注领域:共审查了 64 篇文章,并根据护理绩效框架的子系统、维度和变量对指标进行了编码。所有被审阅的文章都有结果指标的记录。通过二手数据分析,护士们确定了护理人员供应、人员维护、护理流程和风险结果以及安全等需要优先制定质量指标的关注领域:本文提供了一份经过系统编码并附有定义的国家指标清单,以帮助利益相关方确定国家指标制定的优先指标。纳入关注领域有助于深入了解护士从业人员认为与当地情况相关的国家卫生标准。据我们所知,这是第一篇在综合指导国家护理指标制定所需的证据时纳入文献中现有证据和利益相关者观点的论文。这种迭代方法至关重要,因为它提高了知识转化的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychological Distress Associated With Suicidal Ideation Among Glaucoma Patients Attending at Tertiary Eye Care Clinic, Gondar, Ethiopia. Transcultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Nursing Student Competence Scale (NSCS). A Survey Study on the Factors Affecting Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Among Postpartum Women in Mother-Infant Separation Wards. Factors Effective in Lowering Professional Commitment in Nursing and Strategies to Address Them: A Scoping Review. Nursing Students, Faculty, and Preceptors Perception of Effective Characteristics of Clinical Instructor: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1