Improving external fixator pin site care through user involvement: A quality improvement project

{"title":"Improving external fixator pin site care through user involvement: A quality improvement project","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2024.101139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>External fixation is widely used in treating complex fractures and limb reconstruction. Pin site infections remain a significant complication, impacting on patients' physical and psychosocial wellbeing. This clinical improvement project at a University Hospital in Denmark aimed to enhance pin site care by involving patients and caregivers throughout the treatment pathway.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>At our hospital, approximately 55 trauma patients are annually treated with lower limb external fixators. Pin site care is crucial for preventing serious infections/osteomyelitis and involves collaboration between hospital and municipal caregivers. Traditional pin site care in our unit was complex and time-consuming, causing patient anxiety and frequent unplanned clinic visits.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Inspired by the Participatory Design research methodology, a quality improvement project was conducted in three phases: (1) identifying users’ needs, (2) developing solutions collaboratively, and (3) testing/evaluating these solutions. Iterative cycles of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting were employed, facilitating mutual learning among participants. Interviews with patients, families and healthcare professionals and field observations both at the hospital and in the municipality were conducted. Inspiration was sought from international literature.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Phase 1 identified the need for improved education about infection recognition, a less painful and time-consuming dressing method, and an assessment tool for pin site infection. Phase 2 involved extensive user input to develop and implement a new dressing procedure using PolyMem™ along with an assessment tool. Phase 3 evaluated the new methods, revealing reduced patient pain, fewer clinic visits, and stable infection rates as well as less time-consuming pin site care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The project successfully enhanced pin site care, involving users in developing a new care process, thus improving patient satisfaction and care efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for future practice</h3><div>Incorporating patient perspectives and collaborative methods can significantly improve clinical care pathways. Future efforts should focus on further integrating patient centered and participatory approaches in healthcare improvements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124124000595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

External fixation is widely used in treating complex fractures and limb reconstruction. Pin site infections remain a significant complication, impacting on patients' physical and psychosocial wellbeing. This clinical improvement project at a University Hospital in Denmark aimed to enhance pin site care by involving patients and caregivers throughout the treatment pathway.

Background

At our hospital, approximately 55 trauma patients are annually treated with lower limb external fixators. Pin site care is crucial for preventing serious infections/osteomyelitis and involves collaboration between hospital and municipal caregivers. Traditional pin site care in our unit was complex and time-consuming, causing patient anxiety and frequent unplanned clinic visits.

Methods

Inspired by the Participatory Design research methodology, a quality improvement project was conducted in three phases: (1) identifying users’ needs, (2) developing solutions collaboratively, and (3) testing/evaluating these solutions. Iterative cycles of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting were employed, facilitating mutual learning among participants. Interviews with patients, families and healthcare professionals and field observations both at the hospital and in the municipality were conducted. Inspiration was sought from international literature.

Results

Phase 1 identified the need for improved education about infection recognition, a less painful and time-consuming dressing method, and an assessment tool for pin site infection. Phase 2 involved extensive user input to develop and implement a new dressing procedure using PolyMem™ along with an assessment tool. Phase 3 evaluated the new methods, revealing reduced patient pain, fewer clinic visits, and stable infection rates as well as less time-consuming pin site care.

Conclusion

The project successfully enhanced pin site care, involving users in developing a new care process, thus improving patient satisfaction and care efficiency.

Implications for future practice

Incorporating patient perspectives and collaborative methods can significantly improve clinical care pathways. Future efforts should focus on further integrating patient centered and participatory approaches in healthcare improvements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过用户参与改进外固定器针脚部位护理:质量改进项目。
导言:外固定被广泛用于治疗复杂骨折和肢体重建。针脚部位感染仍然是一个重要的并发症,影响着患者的身体和心理健康。丹麦一所大学医院开展的这一临床改进项目旨在通过让患者和护理人员参与整个治疗过程来加强针脚部位护理:背景:在我们医院,每年约有 55 名外伤患者接受下肢外固定器治疗。插针部位护理对于预防严重感染/骨髓炎至关重要,需要医院和市政护理人员通力合作。我们科室传统的插针部位护理既复杂又耗时,导致患者焦虑不安,经常出现计划外就诊:受参与式设计研究方法的启发,质量改进项目分三个阶段进行:(1) 确定用户需求,(2) 合作开发解决方案,(3) 测试/评估这些解决方案。项目采用了计划、行动、观察和反思的迭代循环,促进了参与者之间的相互学习。对病人、家属和医护人员进行了访谈,并在医院和市镇进行了实地观察。从国际文献中寻求灵感:结果:第一阶段发现需要改进有关感染识别的教育、减少痛苦和耗时的包扎方法以及针刺部位感染的评估工具。第 2 阶段涉及广泛的用户输入,以开发和实施使用 PolyMem™ 的新包扎程序和评估工具。第 3 阶段对新方法进行了评估,结果显示患者疼痛减轻,就诊次数减少,感染率稳定,针刺部位护理耗时减少:结论:该项目成功加强了针刺部位护理,让用户参与制定新的护理流程,从而提高了患者满意度和护理效率:对未来实践的启示:纳入患者观点和协作方法可显著改善临床护理路径。未来的工作重点应是进一步将以患者为中心和参与式方法融入医疗保健的改进中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study of older adults: The difficulties and needs of returning home after hip fractures Efficacy of vitamin C supplementation in preventing and treating complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) in Orthopedic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Improving external fixator pin site care through user involvement: A quality improvement project Psychometric properties of Japanese version15D and cultural characteristics of quality of life undergoing patients with hip and knee arthroplasty The relationship of pain catastrophizing in principal caregivers of postoperative children with malignant bone tumors and children's kinesiophobia and pain perception: A cross-sectional survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1