Environmental Eros: the films of Barbara Hammer as "Creative Geographies"1.

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal of Lesbian Studies Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1080/10894160.2024.2396711
Lauran Whitworth
{"title":"Environmental Eros: the films of Barbara Hammer as \"Creative Geographies\"1.","authors":"Lauran Whitworth","doi":"10.1080/10894160.2024.2396711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In her 1978 essay \"Uses of the Erotic: The Erotic as Power,\" Audre Lorde avers, \"The erotic has often been misnamed by men and used against women. It has been made into the confused, the trivial, the psychotic, the plasticized sensation. For this reason, we have often turned away from the exploration and consideration of the erotic as a source of power and information\" (1984, p. 54). Part of our maligning of the erotic, according to Lorde, is our separation of the spiritual from the erotic, a holdover of enlightenment thinking that insists on parsing apart that which is thought from that which is felt and sensed. This paper examines 1970s lesbian-feminist esthetics, specifically the works of American avant-garde filmmaker Barbara Hammer (1939-2019), to delineate an environmental eros, in which more-than-human nature is a source of erotic inspiration and interspecies connection. Just as Lorde theorizes the erotic as a \"reminder of [one's] capacity for feeling and joy\" (1984, p. 56), environmental eros understands the erotic as expansively sensual and sensory instead of solely sexual. My close readings of Hammer's films <i>Dyketactics</i> (1974), <i>Women I Love</i> (1976), and <i>Multiple Orgasm</i> (1976) challenge critiques of these materials as escapist relics of an essentializing past. Instead, I use feminist and film phenomenological theory to argue that the natural environment was an actor in radical re-imaginings of subjecthood and relationality that constitute an eco-erotic ethics with clear implications for contemporary environmental politics and ecological feminisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":46044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lesbian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lesbian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2024.2396711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In her 1978 essay "Uses of the Erotic: The Erotic as Power," Audre Lorde avers, "The erotic has often been misnamed by men and used against women. It has been made into the confused, the trivial, the psychotic, the plasticized sensation. For this reason, we have often turned away from the exploration and consideration of the erotic as a source of power and information" (1984, p. 54). Part of our maligning of the erotic, according to Lorde, is our separation of the spiritual from the erotic, a holdover of enlightenment thinking that insists on parsing apart that which is thought from that which is felt and sensed. This paper examines 1970s lesbian-feminist esthetics, specifically the works of American avant-garde filmmaker Barbara Hammer (1939-2019), to delineate an environmental eros, in which more-than-human nature is a source of erotic inspiration and interspecies connection. Just as Lorde theorizes the erotic as a "reminder of [one's] capacity for feeling and joy" (1984, p. 56), environmental eros understands the erotic as expansively sensual and sensory instead of solely sexual. My close readings of Hammer's films Dyketactics (1974), Women I Love (1976), and Multiple Orgasm (1976) challenge critiques of these materials as escapist relics of an essentializing past. Instead, I use feminist and film phenomenological theory to argue that the natural environment was an actor in radical re-imaginings of subjecthood and relationality that constitute an eco-erotic ethics with clear implications for contemporary environmental politics and ecological feminisms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境爱神:芭芭拉-哈默作为 "创意地理学 "的电影1。
奥德丽-洛德(Audre Lorde)在 1978 年发表的文章《情色的用途:情色是一种权力》中指出:"情色常常被男人错误地命名,并被用来对付女人。它被塑造成混乱的、琐碎的、精神错乱的、可塑的感觉。因此,我们常常不把情色作为一种力量和信息来源来探索和思考"(1984 年,第 54 页)。洛德认为,我们对情色的恶意中伤,部分原因在于我们将精神与情色分离开来,这是启蒙思想的遗留问题,它坚持将思想与感觉和感受分开。本文研究了 20 世纪 70 年代女同性恋美学,特别是美国前卫电影制作人芭芭拉-哈默(Barbara Hammer,1939-2019 年)的作品,以勾勒出一种环境情色,在这种环境情色中,超越人类的大自然是情色灵感和物种间联系的源泉。正如洛德将情色理论定义为 "提醒[一个人]感受和快乐的能力"(1984 年,第 56 页),环境情色将情色理解为广阔的感官和感觉,而不仅仅是性。我对汉默的电影《Dyketactics》(1974 年)、《Women I Love》(1976 年)和《Multiple Orgasm》(1976 年)进行了细读,质疑了将这些材料视为过去本质化的逃避现实遗物的批评。相反,我运用女权主义和电影现象学理论来论证,自然环境是主体性和关系性激进再想象中的一个角色,它构成了一种生态情色伦理,对当代环境政治和生态女权主义有着明确的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lesbian Studies
Journal of Lesbian Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lesbian Studies examines the cultural, historical, and interpersonal impact of the lesbian experience on society, keeping all readers—professional, academic, or general—informed and up to date on current findings, resources, and community concerns. Independent scholars, professors, students, and lay people will find this interdisciplinary journal essential on the topic of lesbian studies!
期刊最新文献
"Then you tell me you've fallen in love with a tree": Queer ecologies in Ali Smith's short stories. Pockets of tenderness: Lesbian earth in Alison Bechdel's Fun Home. A systematic review of the prevalence and associated factors of mental health conditions among lesbian, bisexual, and other sexual minority women in Southeast Asia. Environmental Eros: the films of Barbara Hammer as "Creative Geographies"1. A retrospective study of sexual minority women's gendered sexuality: Butch and femme sex at the turn of the 21st century.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1