Impact of Health Education Programme on Adherence to Treatment in Knee Osteoarthritis: An Interventional Study on Egyptian Patients.

IF 1.6 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Musculoskeletal Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/msc.1954
Amany M Ebaid, Mohamed A Mortada, Fadya A Abd-Ghani, Somaya A Ali
{"title":"Impact of Health Education Programme on Adherence to Treatment in Knee Osteoarthritis: An Interventional Study on Egyptian Patients.","authors":"Amany M Ebaid, Mohamed A Mortada, Fadya A Abd-Ghani, Somaya A Ali","doi":"10.1002/msc.1954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To measure the level of adherence of patients with primary knee osteoarthritis (KOA) to an interventional therapeutic and rehabilitation programme and investigate factors that hinder patients' adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 154 participants with primary knee osteoarthritis (KOA) were divided into intervention and control groups. The intervention protocol included patient education on the nature and treatment of KOA, therapeutic exercise, a weight loss programme for overweight patients, and a physical therapy programme. Participants were followed for 3 months. The Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS-p), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and knee Kellgren-Lawrence OA grading were measured before and after the intervention. Additionally, the Morisky adherence questionnaire and the WHO Multidimensional Framework for factors affecting adherence were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One fifty four participants with KOA were randomly allocated into intervention and control groups. A low level of adherence was detected in both groups (68.8% in the intervention group vs. 84.4% in the control group). Patients who followed the interventional programme were more adherent. Adherence to therapy was associated with a reduction in the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS-p) (p = 0.016) and improved function as measured by WOMAC (p = 0.018). Factors primarily associated with patient non-adherence included unemployment (67.8%), low income (59.3%), no previous response to therapy (58.5%), less frequent follow-up visits (55.1%), lack of insurance (66.9%), difficult access to services (59.3%), and high cost of services (55.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence to treatment in OA patients is a significant concern and a common problem, appearing to be associated more with socioeconomic factors than with pain and function.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"22 4","pages":"e1954"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To measure the level of adherence of patients with primary knee osteoarthritis (KOA) to an interventional therapeutic and rehabilitation programme and investigate factors that hinder patients' adherence.

Methods: A total of 154 participants with primary knee osteoarthritis (KOA) were divided into intervention and control groups. The intervention protocol included patient education on the nature and treatment of KOA, therapeutic exercise, a weight loss programme for overweight patients, and a physical therapy programme. Participants were followed for 3 months. The Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS-p), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and knee Kellgren-Lawrence OA grading were measured before and after the intervention. Additionally, the Morisky adherence questionnaire and the WHO Multidimensional Framework for factors affecting adherence were assessed.

Results: One fifty four participants with KOA were randomly allocated into intervention and control groups. A low level of adherence was detected in both groups (68.8% in the intervention group vs. 84.4% in the control group). Patients who followed the interventional programme were more adherent. Adherence to therapy was associated with a reduction in the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS-p) (p = 0.016) and improved function as measured by WOMAC (p = 0.018). Factors primarily associated with patient non-adherence included unemployment (67.8%), low income (59.3%), no previous response to therapy (58.5%), less frequent follow-up visits (55.1%), lack of insurance (66.9%), difficult access to services (59.3%), and high cost of services (55.1%).

Conclusion: Adherence to treatment in OA patients is a significant concern and a common problem, appearing to be associated more with socioeconomic factors than with pain and function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康教育计划对坚持膝关节骨性关节炎治疗的影响:一项针对埃及患者的干预性研究。
目的:测量原发性膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)患者对介入治疗和康复计划的依从性,并调查阻碍患者依从性的因素:共 154 名原发性膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)患者被分为干预组和对照组。干预方案包括有关 KOA 性质和治疗方法的患者教育、治疗性运动、针对超重患者的减肥计划以及物理治疗计划。对参与者进行了为期 3 个月的随访。干预前后测量了疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS-p)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)以及膝关节凯尔格伦-劳伦斯 OA 分级。此外,还对莫里斯基依从性问卷和世界卫生组织影响依从性因素的多维框架进行了评估:154 名 KOA 患者被随机分配到干预组和对照组。两组患者的依从性均较低(干预组为 68.8%,对照组为 84.4%)。接受干预方案治疗的患者依从性更高。坚持治疗与疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS-p)的降低(p = 0.016)和WOMAC功能的改善(p = 0.018)有关。与患者不坚持治疗有关的主要因素包括失业(67.8%)、低收入(59.3%)、以前对治疗无反应(58.5%)、复诊次数少(55.1%)、缺乏保险(66.9%)、难以获得服务(59.3%)和服务费用高(55.1%):OA患者坚持治疗是一个值得关注的常见问题,似乎与社会经济因素的关系大于疼痛和功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Isolated Balance Exercise Regimen and Conventional Physiotherapy on Lumbar Flexion-Rotation Movement Impairment in Male Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain. Combining Mechanical Support With Sensory Augmentation in Orthotic Devices for Postural Stability in Lateral Ankle Instability: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Environmentally Sustainable Approaches to Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: An Umbrella Review of Practices With Potential Carbon Efficiency. Ultrasonographic Assessment of Geniohyoid Muscle Morphometry and Elasticity in Older Adults: Associations With Sarcopenia Risk and Swallowing Dysfunction. Knowledge of Italian Physiotherapists on Cognitive Testing of Musculoskeletal Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1