Beneficiaries' satisfaction with community-based health insurance services and associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1186/s12962-024-00541-4
Ewunetie Mekashaw Bayked, Husien Nurahmed Toleha, Segenet Zewdie, Asnakew Molla Mekonen, Birhanu Demeke Workneh, Mesfin Haile Kahissay
{"title":"Beneficiaries' satisfaction with community-based health insurance services and associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ewunetie Mekashaw Bayked, Husien Nurahmed Toleha, Segenet Zewdie, Asnakew Molla Mekonen, Birhanu Demeke Workneh, Mesfin Haile Kahissay","doi":"10.1186/s12962-024-00541-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The viability of community-based health insurance programs depends on beneficiary satisfaction, and healthcare systems evaluate performance through patient reports and ratings to ensure effectiveness and service quality. To our knowledge, Ethiopia lacks national pooled data on the satisfaction of community-based health insurance beneficiaries and related factors. As a result, this review aimed to evaluate the level of beneficiaries' satisfaction with the scheme's services and associated factors in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Database searches on Scopus, Hinari, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar were conducted on September 1st, 2022. Thirteen studies were chosen for review from the search results. Checklists from the Joan Briggs Institute were used to evaluate the risk of bias for the included studies. The data were extracted using a 2019 Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using Stata 17. The odds ratios at p-values less than 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval were used to evaluate the effect estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled satisfaction of beneficiaries with community-based health insurance was found to be 66.0% (95% CI = 57-76%) and was found to be influenced by socio-demographic, health service-related, the scheme's related factors, and the beneficiaries' knowledge of it. The beneficiary satisfaction levels were highest in the Amhara region, at 69.0% (95% CI = 59-79%), followed by Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples' Region (SNNPR) at 67.0% (95% CI = 40-94%), Oromia at 63.0% (95% CI = 58-68%), and Addis Ababa at 53.0% (95% CI = 45-62%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though there was a moderate level of satisfaction, there are indications that the quality of health services and the coverage of the entire population lag behind, necessitating greater efforts to achieve universal health coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"22 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00541-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The viability of community-based health insurance programs depends on beneficiary satisfaction, and healthcare systems evaluate performance through patient reports and ratings to ensure effectiveness and service quality. To our knowledge, Ethiopia lacks national pooled data on the satisfaction of community-based health insurance beneficiaries and related factors. As a result, this review aimed to evaluate the level of beneficiaries' satisfaction with the scheme's services and associated factors in Ethiopia.

Methods: Database searches on Scopus, Hinari, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar were conducted on September 1st, 2022. Thirteen studies were chosen for review from the search results. Checklists from the Joan Briggs Institute were used to evaluate the risk of bias for the included studies. The data were extracted using a 2019 Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using Stata 17. The odds ratios at p-values less than 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval were used to evaluate the effect estimates.

Results: The pooled satisfaction of beneficiaries with community-based health insurance was found to be 66.0% (95% CI = 57-76%) and was found to be influenced by socio-demographic, health service-related, the scheme's related factors, and the beneficiaries' knowledge of it. The beneficiary satisfaction levels were highest in the Amhara region, at 69.0% (95% CI = 59-79%), followed by Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples' Region (SNNPR) at 67.0% (95% CI = 40-94%), Oromia at 63.0% (95% CI = 58-68%), and Addis Ababa at 53.0% (95% CI = 45-62%).

Conclusion: Even though there was a moderate level of satisfaction, there are indications that the quality of health services and the coverage of the entire population lag behind, necessitating greater efforts to achieve universal health coverage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚受益人对社区医疗保险服务的满意度及相关因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:社区医疗保险计划的可行性取决于受益人的满意度,医疗保健系统通过患者报告和评分来评估绩效,以确保有效性和服务质量。据我们所知,埃塞俄比亚缺乏有关社区医疗保险受益人满意度及相关因素的全国性汇总数据。因此,本综述旨在评估埃塞俄比亚受益人对该计划服务的满意度及相关因素:于 2022 年 9 月 1 日在 Scopus、Hinari、PubMed、Google Scholar 和 Semantic Scholar 上进行了数据库检索。从搜索结果中选择了 13 项研究进行审查。使用琼-布里格斯研究所(Joan Briggs Institute)提供的核对表来评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。数据使用 2019 Microsoft Excel 电子表格提取,并使用 Stata 17 进行分析。使用 P 值小于 0.05 且置信区间为 95% 的几率来评估效应估计值:发现受益人对社区医疗保险的总体满意度为 66.0%(95% CI = 57-76%),且受社会人口学、医疗服务相关因素、计划相关因素以及受益人对计划的了解程度的影响。受益人满意度最高的是阿姆哈拉地区,为 69.0%(95% CI = 59-79%),其次是南方各族州(SNNPR),为 67.0%(95% CI = 40-94%),奥罗莫州为 63.0%(95% CI = 58-68%),亚的斯亚贝巴为 53.0%(95% CI = 45-62%):尽管满意度处于中等水平,但有迹象表明,医疗服务的质量和全体人口的覆盖率仍然落后,因此有必要加大力度实现全民医保。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
期刊最新文献
Assessing diagnosis-related groups based direct medical expenditures of chronic disease patients in general hospital of lower southern Thailand. Health system efficiency and equity in ASEAN: an empirical investigation. Coverage and distributional benefit-cost of rotavirus vaccine in Uganda: an analysis of routine health facility aggregated data. Cost-effectiveness of fenofibrate for preventing diabetic complications in Australia. Cost-effectiveness of high-dose vitamin D supplementation to reduce the occurrence of repeat episodes of pneumonia in children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1