Intensified post-stroke care improves long-term dysphagia recovery after acute ischemic stroke: Results from the STROKE CARD trial.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Stroke Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1177/23969873241284123
Anel Karisik, Vincent Bader, Kurt Moelgg, Lucie Buergi, Benjamin Dejakum, Silvia Komarek, Christian Boehme, Thomas Toell, Lukas Mayer-Suess, Simon Sollereder, Sonja Rossi, Patricia Meier, Gudrun Schoenherr, Johann Willeit, Peter Willeit, Wilfried Lang, Stefan Kiechl, Michael Knoflach, Raimund Pechlaner
{"title":"Intensified post-stroke care improves long-term dysphagia recovery after acute ischemic stroke: Results from the STROKE CARD trial.","authors":"Anel Karisik, Vincent Bader, Kurt Moelgg, Lucie Buergi, Benjamin Dejakum, Silvia Komarek, Christian Boehme, Thomas Toell, Lukas Mayer-Suess, Simon Sollereder, Sonja Rossi, Patricia Meier, Gudrun Schoenherr, Johann Willeit, Peter Willeit, Wilfried Lang, Stefan Kiechl, Michael Knoflach, Raimund Pechlaner","doi":"10.1177/23969873241284123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dysphagia is common after acute ischemic stroke and entails considerable morbidity and mortality. Here, we investigated the impact of intensified care on swallowing recovery after stroke.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this secondary analysis of STROKE-CARD, a randomized intervention trial of intensified post-stroke care, dysphagia was assessed by speech therapists at admission for acute ischemic stroke, at hospital discharge, and after 12-months. Patients randomized to STROKE-CARD care additionally received a detailed dysphagia follow-up at 3-months, including a standardized dysphagia examination, instructions on further exercises and compensation mechanisms and, if necessary, referral for further speech therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dysphagia was present initially after stroke in 236 (16.6%; median age 82 (73-88), 44.1% female) of 1419 patients, with similar prevalence in both study groups at hospital admission (<i>p</i> = 0.239) and discharge (<i>p</i> = 0.870). At follow up, 14 (9.5%) of 147 in the intervention group and 18 (20.2%) of 89 in the control group suffered from persistent dysphagia (<i>p</i> = 0.020). There was better dysphagia recovery in the intervention group also under multivariable adjustment for age, sex, functional disability at 12-months, severe dysphagia at hospitalization, mode of feeding, cognitive impairment, thrombolysis, and stroke localization (odds ratio, 0.41, 95% confidence interval: 0.17 to 0.96).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Intensified post-stroke care improved dysphagia recovery within 1 year after acute ischemic stroke, highlighting the potential of targeted interventions for enhancing stroke outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Stroke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873241284123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dysphagia is common after acute ischemic stroke and entails considerable morbidity and mortality. Here, we investigated the impact of intensified care on swallowing recovery after stroke.

Patients and methods: In this secondary analysis of STROKE-CARD, a randomized intervention trial of intensified post-stroke care, dysphagia was assessed by speech therapists at admission for acute ischemic stroke, at hospital discharge, and after 12-months. Patients randomized to STROKE-CARD care additionally received a detailed dysphagia follow-up at 3-months, including a standardized dysphagia examination, instructions on further exercises and compensation mechanisms and, if necessary, referral for further speech therapy.

Results: Dysphagia was present initially after stroke in 236 (16.6%; median age 82 (73-88), 44.1% female) of 1419 patients, with similar prevalence in both study groups at hospital admission (p = 0.239) and discharge (p = 0.870). At follow up, 14 (9.5%) of 147 in the intervention group and 18 (20.2%) of 89 in the control group suffered from persistent dysphagia (p = 0.020). There was better dysphagia recovery in the intervention group also under multivariable adjustment for age, sex, functional disability at 12-months, severe dysphagia at hospitalization, mode of feeding, cognitive impairment, thrombolysis, and stroke localization (odds ratio, 0.41, 95% confidence interval: 0.17 to 0.96).

Discussion and conclusion: Intensified post-stroke care improved dysphagia recovery within 1 year after acute ischemic stroke, highlighting the potential of targeted interventions for enhancing stroke outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强卒中后护理可改善急性缺血性卒中后吞咽困难的长期恢复:STROKE CARD试验的结果。
导言:吞咽困难是急性缺血性中风后的常见病,会导致相当高的发病率和死亡率。在此,我们研究了强化护理对中风后吞咽功能恢复的影响:STROKE-CARD 是一项卒中后强化护理的随机干预试验,在该试验的二次分析中,语言治疗师对急性缺血性卒中患者入院时、出院时和 12 个月后的吞咽困难情况进行了评估。随机接受 STROKE-CARD 护理的患者还在 3 个月后接受了详细的吞咽困难随访,包括标准化吞咽困难检查、进一步锻炼和补偿机制指导,以及必要时转诊接受进一步言语治疗:1419 名患者中有 236 人(16.6%;中位年龄 82(73-88)岁,44.1% 为女性)在卒中后初期出现吞咽困难,两组患者入院时(p = 0.239)和出院时(p = 0.870)的吞咽困难发生率相似。随访时,干预组 147 人中有 14 人(9.5%)出现持续性吞咽困难,对照组 89 人中有 18 人(20.2%)出现持续性吞咽困难(p = 0.020)。在对年龄、性别、12 个月时的功能障碍、住院时的严重吞咽困难、喂食方式、认知障碍、溶栓和卒中定位进行多变量调整后,干预组的吞咽困难恢复情况也更好(几率比 0.41,95% 置信区间:0.17 至 0.96):讨论与结论:加强卒中后护理可改善急性缺血性卒中后 1 年内吞咽困难的恢复,突出了有针对性的干预措施在改善卒中预后方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Launched in 2016 the European Stroke Journal (ESJ) is the official journal of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), a professional non-profit organization with over 1,400 individual members, and affiliations to numerous related national and international societies. ESJ covers clinical stroke research from all fields, including clinical trials, epidemiology, primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, acute and post-acute management, guidelines, translation of experimental findings into clinical practice, rehabilitation, organisation of stroke care, and societal impact. It is open to authors from all relevant medical and health professions. Article types include review articles, original research, protocols, guidelines, editorials and letters to the Editor. Through ESJ, authors and researchers have gained a new platform for the rapid and professional publication of peer reviewed scientific material of the highest standards; publication in ESJ is highly competitive. The journal and its editorial team has developed excellent cooperation with sister organisations such as the World Stroke Organisation and the International Journal of Stroke, and the American Heart Organization/American Stroke Association and the journal Stroke. ESJ is fully peer-reviewed and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Issues are published 4 times a year (March, June, September and December) and articles are published OnlineFirst prior to issue publication.
期刊最新文献
Incident dementia in ischaemic stroke patients with early cardiac complications: A propensity-score matched cohort study. Comparing the properties of traditional and novel approaches to the modified Rankin scale: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of smoke-free legislation on stroke risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Initial blood pressure and adverse cardiac events following acute ischaemic stroke: An individual patient data pooled analysis from the VISTA database. Outcomes of different anesthesia techniques in nonagenarians treated with mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: An inverse probability weighting analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1