Intermediate and secondary school food environment in New Zealand: Food and drink menu assessment.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Promotion Journal of Australia Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1002/hpja.929
Shannon Green, Ajmol Ali, Carol Wham
{"title":"Intermediate and secondary school food environment in New Zealand: Food and drink menu assessment.","authors":"Shannon Green, Ajmol Ali, Carol Wham","doi":"10.1002/hpja.929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Issue addressed: </strong>Nutrition-related obesity is rising among adolescents in New Zealand with an estimated one in eight children being obese. The school environment is an ideal community setting for encouraging a healthy lifestyle as schools contain a diverse population and involve students and parents. However, the healthiness of food available to intermediate and secondary school students (Years 7-13) is unknown. This study assessed how food and drink menus from schools align with policy guidelines for healthy school food environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of NZ schools' (years 7-13; ages 10-19) menus was collected in 2020. Menus were classified using traffic light criteria. A toolkit was developed by three nutritionists and one dietitian (with trained staff support) to aid with menu classification. Menu quality was evaluated against school characteristics and policy use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the school menus assessed (n = 60), 3.3% met the recommendation for the provision of 75% 'green' items. 'Red' items were the main contributors (mean = 53.6%). Schools with high socio-economic status (deciles 8-10; 14.3%; p < 0.05) and small school size (<749 students; 14.1%; p < 0.025) were associated with a higher proportion of 'green' items. Community (19.3%) and in-house (25.9%) food providers provided a lower percentage of 'amber' items than school providers (39.3%; p < 0.001). In-house providers (64.6%) had a greater percentage of 'red' items than school providers (48.2%; p = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Food available in schools (Years 7-13) tends to be unhealthy. A national nutrition policy could improve the school food environment, especially in schools with large populations and low socio-economic status. SO WHAT?: School demographics have been associated with menu quality but further research within these schools is needed to identify the gaps to improve equitable outcomes within school food environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.929","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue addressed: Nutrition-related obesity is rising among adolescents in New Zealand with an estimated one in eight children being obese. The school environment is an ideal community setting for encouraging a healthy lifestyle as schools contain a diverse population and involve students and parents. However, the healthiness of food available to intermediate and secondary school students (Years 7-13) is unknown. This study assessed how food and drink menus from schools align with policy guidelines for healthy school food environments.

Methods: A convenience sample of NZ schools' (years 7-13; ages 10-19) menus was collected in 2020. Menus were classified using traffic light criteria. A toolkit was developed by three nutritionists and one dietitian (with trained staff support) to aid with menu classification. Menu quality was evaluated against school characteristics and policy use.

Results: Of the school menus assessed (n = 60), 3.3% met the recommendation for the provision of 75% 'green' items. 'Red' items were the main contributors (mean = 53.6%). Schools with high socio-economic status (deciles 8-10; 14.3%; p < 0.05) and small school size (<749 students; 14.1%; p < 0.025) were associated with a higher proportion of 'green' items. Community (19.3%) and in-house (25.9%) food providers provided a lower percentage of 'amber' items than school providers (39.3%; p < 0.001). In-house providers (64.6%) had a greater percentage of 'red' items than school providers (48.2%; p = 0.017).

Conclusion: Food available in schools (Years 7-13) tends to be unhealthy. A national nutrition policy could improve the school food environment, especially in schools with large populations and low socio-economic status. SO WHAT?: School demographics have been associated with menu quality but further research within these schools is needed to identify the gaps to improve equitable outcomes within school food environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰中小学食品环境:餐饮菜单评估。
解决问题:新西兰青少年中与营养有关的肥胖率正在上升,估计每八名儿童中就有一名肥胖。学校环境是鼓励健康生活方式的理想社区环境,因为学校里有不同的人群,学生和家长都参与其中。然而,中学生(7-13 年级)的食品健康状况却不为人知。本研究评估了学校的餐饮菜单与健康校园食品环境政策指南的一致性:方法:2020 年收集了新西兰学校(7-13 年级;10-19 岁)的菜单样本。采用交通灯标准对菜单进行分类。三名营养学家和一名营养师(在经过培训的工作人员的支持下)开发了一个工具包,以帮助菜单分类。根据学校特点和政策使用情况对菜单质量进行评估:结果:在接受评估的学校菜单(n = 60)中,3.3%的菜单符合75%"绿色 "菜品的建议。红色 "食品是主要原因(平均 = 53.6%)。社会经济地位较高的学校(第 8-10 个十分位数;14.3%;P学校(7-13 年级)提供的食物往往不健康。国家营养政策可以改善学校食品环境,尤其是在人口众多、社会经济地位较低的学校。所以呢?学校人口统计与菜单质量有关,但需要在这些学校开展进一步研究,找出差距,以改善学校食品环境的公平结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
期刊最新文献
Socioeconomic status and adherence to COVID-19 preventative measures in Australia: A national cohort study. Public health policy for temporary seasonal workers with chronic hepatitis B in high-income countries: A comparative analysis. Issue Information Intermediate and secondary school food environment in New Zealand: Food and drink menu assessment. Retrospective analysis of regional and metropolitan school food environments using Google Street View: A case study in New South Wales, Australia with youth consultation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1