A process study of early achievements and challenges in countries engaged with the WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Mental Health Systems Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1186/s13033-024-00652-8
Alastair Ager, Sabrina Hermosilla, Alison Schafer, Dévora Kestel
{"title":"A process study of early achievements and challenges in countries engaged with the WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health.","authors":"Alastair Ager, Sabrina Hermosilla, Alison Schafer, Dévora Kestel","doi":"10.1186/s13033-024-00652-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is increasing awareness of the importance of the transformation of mental health systems. Launched in 2019, the WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health seeks to accelerate access to quality and affordable care for mental health conditions as an integral component of Universal Health Coverage. Nine countries are currently engaged with the initiative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reviewed processes of implementation-and progress achieved-across all settings by late 2022. It involved review of 158 documents provided by WHO relating to Special Initiative activities and 42 interviews with country-level stakeholders, WHO Regional and HQ personnel engaged with the initiative, and core donors. Documents were thematically coded using a template based upon the WHO framework of health system building blocks. Responses to structured interviews were coded based on an emergent thematic framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Documentation reported similar achievements across all domains; however challenges were reported most frequently in relation to service delivery, leadership and governance, and workforce. Issues of financing were notable in being twice as likely to be reported as a challenge than a success. Interviews indicated four major areas of perceived achievement: establishing a platform and profile to address mental health issues; convening a multi-stakeholder, participatory engagement process; new, appropriate services being developed; and key developments in law, policy, or governance around mental health. The planning process followed for the initiative, senior country-level buy-in and the quality of key personnel were the factors considered most influential in driving progress. Ambivalent political commitment and competing priorities were the most frequently cited challenges across all interviewees.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The role of the Special Initiative in raising the profile of mental health on national agendas through a participatory and inclusive process has been widely valued, and there are indications of the beginnings of transformational shifts in mental health services. To secure these benefits, findings suggest three strategic priorities: increasing political prioritisation and funding for systems-level change; clearly articulating sustainable, transformed models of care; and promoting feasible and contextualised measures to support accountability and course correction. All are of potential relevance in informing global strategies for mental health systems transformation in other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":"18 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-024-00652-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is increasing awareness of the importance of the transformation of mental health systems. Launched in 2019, the WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health seeks to accelerate access to quality and affordable care for mental health conditions as an integral component of Universal Health Coverage. Nine countries are currently engaged with the initiative.

Methods: This study reviewed processes of implementation-and progress achieved-across all settings by late 2022. It involved review of 158 documents provided by WHO relating to Special Initiative activities and 42 interviews with country-level stakeholders, WHO Regional and HQ personnel engaged with the initiative, and core donors. Documents were thematically coded using a template based upon the WHO framework of health system building blocks. Responses to structured interviews were coded based on an emergent thematic framework.

Results: Documentation reported similar achievements across all domains; however challenges were reported most frequently in relation to service delivery, leadership and governance, and workforce. Issues of financing were notable in being twice as likely to be reported as a challenge than a success. Interviews indicated four major areas of perceived achievement: establishing a platform and profile to address mental health issues; convening a multi-stakeholder, participatory engagement process; new, appropriate services being developed; and key developments in law, policy, or governance around mental health. The planning process followed for the initiative, senior country-level buy-in and the quality of key personnel were the factors considered most influential in driving progress. Ambivalent political commitment and competing priorities were the most frequently cited challenges across all interviewees.

Conclusions: The role of the Special Initiative in raising the profile of mental health on national agendas through a participatory and inclusive process has been widely valued, and there are indications of the beginnings of transformational shifts in mental health services. To secure these benefits, findings suggest three strategic priorities: increasing political prioritisation and funding for systems-level change; clearly articulating sustainable, transformed models of care; and promoting feasible and contextualised measures to support accountability and course correction. All are of potential relevance in informing global strategies for mental health systems transformation in other settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对参与世界卫生组织心理健康特别倡议的国家的早期成就和挑战的过程研究。
背景:人们日益认识到精神卫生系统转型的重要性。世卫组织心理健康特别倡议于 2019 年启动,旨在加快提供优质、负担得起的心理健康护理,作为全民健康保险的一个组成部分。目前有九个国家参与了该倡议:本研究回顾了截至 2022 年底在所有环境中的实施过程和取得的进展。本研究审查了世卫组织提供的与特别倡议活动有关的 158 份文件,并对国家级利益相关方、参与倡议的世卫组织地区和总部人员以及核心捐助者进行了 42 次访谈。使用基于世卫组织卫生系统构件框架的模板对文件进行了主题编码。对结构化访谈的答复则根据新出现的主题框架进行编码:文件报告在所有领域都取得了类似的成就;但报告最多的是在提供服务、领导和治理以及劳动力方面存在的挑战。值得注意的是,资金问题被报告为挑战的可能性是成功的两倍。访谈显示,在四个主要领域取得了明显的成就:建立了解决心理健康问题的平台和形象;召集了多方利益攸关方参与的进程;开发了新的、适当的服务;以及围绕心理健康的法律、政策或治理方面取得了重大进展。在推动进展方面,人们认为最有影响力的因素是倡议所遵循的规划过程、国家层面的高层支持以及关键人员的素质。所有受访者最常提到的挑战是政治承诺不明确和优先事项相互竞争:特别倡议通过一个参与性和包容性的过程,在提高心理健康在国家议程中的地位方面所发挥的作用得到了广泛的重视,有迹象表明心理健康服务开始发生转变。为了确保这些益处,研究结果提出了三个战略重点:提高政治优先性,为系统层面的变革提供更多资金;明确阐述可持续的、转变后的护理模式;推广可行的、符合实际情况的措施,以支持问责制和方向修正。所有这些都有可能为其他环境下心理健康系统转型的全球战略提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reducing stigma and improving access to care for people with mental health conditions in the community: protocol for a multi-site feasibility intervention study (Indigo-Local). Reach, uptake, and psychological outcomes of two publicly funded internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy programs in Ontario, Canada: an observational study. Italian Evaluation and Excellence in REMS (ITAL-EE-REMS): appropriate placement of forensic patients in REMS forensic facilities. Evaluating Pakistan's mental healthcare system using World Health Organization's assessment instrument for mental health system (WHO-AIMS). A process study of early achievements and challenges in countries engaged with the WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1