Discrimination of mnemonic similarity is associated with short-term and long-term memory precision.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Memory & Cognition Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.3758/s13421-024-01648-y
Weizhen Xie, Tianye Ma, Sanikaa Thakurdesai, Inik Kim, Weiwei Zhang
{"title":"Discrimination of mnemonic similarity is associated with short-term and long-term memory precision.","authors":"Weizhen Xie, Tianye Ma, Sanikaa Thakurdesai, Inik Kim, Weiwei Zhang","doi":"10.3758/s13421-024-01648-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Remembering specific memories with precision relies on the differentiation of similar memory contents - a process commonly referred to as pattern separation and behaviorally operationalized as lure discrimination in the mnemonic similarity task. Although pattern separation is typically investigated in the context of long-term memory (LTM), recent research extends these findings to short-term memory (STM) within a mixture model framework, emphasizing the distinction between memory quality and quantity. According to this framework, pattern separation is associated with memory precision across STM and LTM, regardless of the overall memory likelihood. However, these associations among memory quality measures may persist without the mixture model assumption. In an alternative model, a unitary memory strength measure quantified as a discrimination score (d') may also capture the association between pattern separation and memory quality, as pattern separation has been previously linked with strength-based memory performance. We tested these possibilities based on individual differences among 132 participants who underwent tasks measuring mnemonic pattern separation and STM/LTM quality. We found that behavioral estimates of pattern separation are significantly correlated with STM and LTM precision, irrespective of the likelihood of STM/LTM recall success. However, these associations are absent when considering the correlation between pattern separation and memory strength under a unitary model framework. By leveraging individual differences to constrain our understanding of cognitive models, our data unravel the intricate relationship between pattern separation and memory quality across timescales. These findings may therefore contribute to identifying sensitive behavioral measures for detecting subtle memory deficits in older adults or clinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48398,"journal":{"name":"Memory & Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01648-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remembering specific memories with precision relies on the differentiation of similar memory contents - a process commonly referred to as pattern separation and behaviorally operationalized as lure discrimination in the mnemonic similarity task. Although pattern separation is typically investigated in the context of long-term memory (LTM), recent research extends these findings to short-term memory (STM) within a mixture model framework, emphasizing the distinction between memory quality and quantity. According to this framework, pattern separation is associated with memory precision across STM and LTM, regardless of the overall memory likelihood. However, these associations among memory quality measures may persist without the mixture model assumption. In an alternative model, a unitary memory strength measure quantified as a discrimination score (d') may also capture the association between pattern separation and memory quality, as pattern separation has been previously linked with strength-based memory performance. We tested these possibilities based on individual differences among 132 participants who underwent tasks measuring mnemonic pattern separation and STM/LTM quality. We found that behavioral estimates of pattern separation are significantly correlated with STM and LTM precision, irrespective of the likelihood of STM/LTM recall success. However, these associations are absent when considering the correlation between pattern separation and memory strength under a unitary model framework. By leveraging individual differences to constrain our understanding of cognitive models, our data unravel the intricate relationship between pattern separation and memory quality across timescales. These findings may therefore contribute to identifying sensitive behavioral measures for detecting subtle memory deficits in older adults or clinical populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记忆法相似性的辨别与短期和长期记忆的精确性有关。
精确记忆特定的记忆依赖于相似记忆内容的区分--这一过程通常被称为模式分离,并在记忆相似性任务中以诱饵辨别作为行为操作。虽然模式分离通常是在长期记忆(LTM)的背景下进行研究的,但最近的研究将这些发现扩展到了混合模型框架下的短期记忆(STM),强调了记忆质量和数量之间的区别。根据这一框架,无论总体记忆可能性如何,模式分离都与 STM 和 LTM 的记忆精确度相关。然而,如果没有混合物模型假设,记忆质量测量之间的这些关联可能会持续存在。在另一种模型中,量化为辨别力分数(d')的单一记忆强度测量也可能捕捉到模式分离与记忆质量之间的关联,因为模式分离与基于强度的记忆表现之前就有关联。我们根据 132 名参与者的个体差异测试了这些可能性,这些参与者都接受了测量记忆模式分离和 STM/LTM 质量的任务。我们发现,对模式分离的行为估计与 STM 和 LTM 精确度显著相关,与 STM/LTM 回忆成功的可能性无关。然而,在单一模型框架下考虑模式分离与记忆强度之间的相关性时,却没有发现这些关联。通过利用个体差异来限制我们对认知模型的理解,我们的数据揭示了模式分离与跨时标记忆质量之间错综复杂的关系。因此,这些发现可能有助于确定敏感的行为测量方法,以检测老年人或临床人群的细微记忆缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Memory & Cognition
Memory & Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Memory & Cognition covers human memory and learning, conceptual processes, psycholinguistics, problem solving, thinking, decision making, and skilled performance, including relevant work in the areas of computer simulation, information processing, mathematical psychology, developmental psychology, and experimental social psychology.
期刊最新文献
Cost avoidance underlies decisions to use prospective memory reminders. Examining the semantic relatedness effect on working memory with ad hoc categories. Expecting the unexpected: Examining the interplay between real-world knowledge and contextual cues during language comprehension. Temporal attention modulates distraction resistance of visual working memory representations. The impact of cross-language co-activation of cognates on bilingual performance on the reading span task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1