Story Circles of Black Doulas, Cultural Brokers for Birthing People in Healthcare.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Qualitative Health Research Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1177/10497323241280828
Kacie C A Blackman, Urmeka Jefferson, Wyconda Cotton-Curtis, Detrich Galloway
{"title":"Story Circles of Black Doulas, Cultural Brokers for Birthing People in Healthcare.","authors":"Kacie C A Blackman, Urmeka Jefferson, Wyconda Cotton-Curtis, Detrich Galloway","doi":"10.1177/10497323241280828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Doula care services (in-person, hybrid, and virtual) during the COVID-19 pandemic may vary. The purpose of this study was to explore doulas' experiences as birthing professionals and epistemological resources assisting Black birthing families during the pandemic. Virtual qualitative story circles were conducted with 11 Black doulas who attended births as doulas from January 2020 to December 2021. Participants were recruited in California. The story circles were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis, with attention to the influence of epistemic injustice (types of injustices inflicted on marginalized groups) on service provision. Additionally, we employed Patricia Hill Collins' Black Feminist Theory which describes \"Black women's ways of knowing\" that disrupts and challenges existing epistemologies. Narrative data revealed (1) doulas are positioned as possessors of epistemic influence in birthing spaces with intersecting social identities, (2) a pervasive oppression of doulas' knowledge, (3) epistemological resilience and disruption, and (4) a commitment to Black indigenous practices. Despite these epistemic unfair structures, systems, and experiences, Black doulas reimagine and establish pathways for birthing families to navigate the healthcare system during intrapartum care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323241280828"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241280828","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Doula care services (in-person, hybrid, and virtual) during the COVID-19 pandemic may vary. The purpose of this study was to explore doulas' experiences as birthing professionals and epistemological resources assisting Black birthing families during the pandemic. Virtual qualitative story circles were conducted with 11 Black doulas who attended births as doulas from January 2020 to December 2021. Participants were recruited in California. The story circles were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis, with attention to the influence of epistemic injustice (types of injustices inflicted on marginalized groups) on service provision. Additionally, we employed Patricia Hill Collins' Black Feminist Theory which describes "Black women's ways of knowing" that disrupts and challenges existing epistemologies. Narrative data revealed (1) doulas are positioned as possessors of epistemic influence in birthing spaces with intersecting social identities, (2) a pervasive oppression of doulas' knowledge, (3) epistemological resilience and disruption, and (4) a commitment to Black indigenous practices. Despite these epistemic unfair structures, systems, and experiences, Black doulas reimagine and establish pathways for birthing families to navigate the healthcare system during intrapartum care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑人产婆的故事圈,医疗保健中分娩者的文化经纪人。
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,朵拉护理服务(面对面、混合和虚拟)可能会有所不同。本研究旨在探讨朵拉作为分娩专业人员的经验以及在大流行期间协助黑人分娩家庭的认识论资源。在 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,与 11 名作为助产士参加分娩的黑人助产士开展了虚拟定性故事圈。参与者在加利福尼亚州招募。对故事圈进行了录音和逐字记录。我们使用内容分析法对记录誊本进行了分析,并关注了认识不公正(对边缘化群体造成的不公正类型)对服务提供的影响。此外,我们还采用了帕特里夏-希尔-柯林斯的黑人女权主义理论,该理论描述了 "黑人妇女的认知方式",对现有的认识论进行了颠覆和挑战。叙事数据显示:(1)在社会身份相互交叉的分娩空间中,朵拉被定位为具有认识论影响力的人;(2)朵拉的知识普遍受到压制;(3)认识论的复原力和破坏力;以及(4)对黑人本土实践的承诺。尽管存在着这些认识论上的不公平结构、系统和经验,黑人助产士仍为分娩家庭在产前护理期间导航医疗保健系统提供了新的想象和途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
期刊最新文献
From Promise to Practice: How Health Researchers Understand and Promote Transdisciplinary Collaboration. The Changing Care of Older Adults With Bipolar Disorder: A Narrative Analysis. Age Melancholy of Older Mizrahi Women Residing in Tel Aviv as a Social Loss: Exploring Intersections of Health and Social Support in an Ethnographic Study. The Emotional Aftermath of Surviving an Attempted Intimate Partner Homicide. Understanding the Experiences and Support Needs of Close Relatives in Psychiatric Euthanasia Trajectories: A Qualitative Exploration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1