Humanistic care ability and its influencing factors among Chinese surgical nurses.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70021
Xiao-Ju Teng, Miao-Miao Yan, X U Yan-Qun, L I Yuan-Zheng, Xiu-Bin Tao, Wei-Zhen Zou, Xiao-Ming Wang, Wenru Wang, Ying Jiang
{"title":"Humanistic care ability and its influencing factors among Chinese surgical nurses.","authors":"Xiao-Ju Teng, Miao-Miao Yan, X U Yan-Qun, L I Yuan-Zheng, Xiu-Bin Tao, Wei-Zhen Zou, Xiao-Ming Wang, Wenru Wang, Ying Jiang","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This paper aims to investigate the humanistic care ability among surgical nurses in China and identify its statistically significant influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional, descriptive and correlational design was used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 210 surgical nurses were recruited from a tertiary public hospital in Wuhu, Anhui Province. Four with incomplete responses were excluded, leaving 206 participants for data analysis. Variables were measured using the general questionnaire, caring ability inventory (CAI), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES). Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify the statistically significant influencing factors of participants' humanistic caring ability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall average score of the CAI was 190.14 (SD = 19.24), and the average scores for the three dimensions of cognitive, courage, and patience were 70.46 (SD = 7.77), 62.12 (SD = 8.47) and 57.56 (SD = 6.02), respectively. The overall average score of the GSES was 26.05 (SD = 5.77). Professional attitude, perceived care from the department head nurse, perceived care from colleagues and self-efficacy were the statistically significant factors influencing the humanistic care ability of surgical nurses (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.45, adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.44, F = 40.64, p < 0.001).</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"11 10","pages":"e70021"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This paper aims to investigate the humanistic care ability among surgical nurses in China and identify its statistically significant influencing factors.

Design: A cross-sectional, descriptive and correlational design was used.

Methods: A total of 210 surgical nurses were recruited from a tertiary public hospital in Wuhu, Anhui Province. Four with incomplete responses were excluded, leaving 206 participants for data analysis. Variables were measured using the general questionnaire, caring ability inventory (CAI), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES). Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify the statistically significant influencing factors of participants' humanistic caring ability.

Results: The overall average score of the CAI was 190.14 (SD = 19.24), and the average scores for the three dimensions of cognitive, courage, and patience were 70.46 (SD = 7.77), 62.12 (SD = 8.47) and 57.56 (SD = 6.02), respectively. The overall average score of the GSES was 26.05 (SD = 5.77). Professional attitude, perceived care from the department head nurse, perceived care from colleagues and self-efficacy were the statistically significant factors influencing the humanistic care ability of surgical nurses (R2 = 0.45, adjusted R2 = 0.44, F = 40.64, p < 0.001).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国外科护士的人文关怀能力及其影响因素。
目的:本文旨在调查中国外科护士的人文关怀能力,并确定其具有统计学意义的影响因素:设计:采用横断面、描述性和相关性设计:方法:从安徽省芜湖市一家三级公立医院共招募 210 名外科护士。排除了 4 名回答不完整的参与者,剩下 206 名参与者用于数据分析。采用一般问卷、护理能力量表(CAI)和一般自我效能感量表(GSES)对变量进行测量。通过多变量线性回归分析,找出对参与者人文关怀能力有显著统计学影响的因素:CAI的总平均分为190.14分(SD=19.24),认知、勇气和耐心三个维度的平均分分别为70.46分(SD=7.77)、62.12分(SD=8.47)和57.56分(SD=6.02)。心理健康调查的总平均分为 26.05(标准差 = 5.77)。专业态度、科室护士长关怀感知、同事关怀感知和自我效能感是影响外科护士人文关怀能力的统计学显著因素(R2 = 0.45,调整后 R2 = 0.44,F = 40.64,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
期刊最新文献
A Personalised Caring Approach at Home-Patients, Relatives and Nurses' Experiences of Specialised Palliative Care: An Integrative Literature Review. Inclusivity in Practice Education: The Views and Experiences of Nurse Educators Supporting Nursing Students With Mental Health Needs in Mental Health Clinical Placements. Association Between Frailty and Mortality, Falls and Hospitalisation Among Patients Undergoing Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Preparation and Reliability and Validity Test of the Questionnaire on the Maintenance of Intravenous Catheter in ICU Nurses' Center. The Effect of Massage, Acupressure and Reflexology on Restless Legs Syndrome Severity and Sleep Quality in Patients Receiving Haemodialysis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1