Integrating physiotherapy into primary health care in Italy: qualitative focus group study examining perspectives of involved professionals.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2414242
Matteo Paci, Andrea Quercioli, Samuele Natali, Lapo Bianchi, Elisa Buonandi, Laura Rosiello, Sandra Moretti
{"title":"Integrating physiotherapy into primary health care in Italy: qualitative focus group study examining perspectives of involved professionals.","authors":"Matteo Paci, Andrea Quercioli, Samuele Natali, Lapo Bianchi, Elisa Buonandi, Laura Rosiello, Sandra Moretti","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2414242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Community Physiotherapist model is an on-call service within the primary care setting, consisting of four consultations for people with chronic functional limitations. It was designed, developed and introduced as a project for the first time in Italy in 2021 and it has been shown to be effective and safe.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given the novelty of the model, this focus group study aims to explore the perspectives of involved physiotherapists, general practitioners and medical specialists on the perceived efficiency and quality of the service. A qualitative design was used with two balanced multidisciplinary focus groups of 12 participants. The Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes emerged from the analysis, related to the speed of both referral and intervention, tailored interventions and perceived quality: Efficiency, Perceived quality, Project implementation, Training, and Project dissemination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study findings showed that the model was appreciated by the professionals involved, although some aspect about communication between professionals and with patients/caregivers, as well as some organizational aspects, needed improvement. Further research should address the perspectives of the patients/caregivers involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2414242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Community Physiotherapist model is an on-call service within the primary care setting, consisting of four consultations for people with chronic functional limitations. It was designed, developed and introduced as a project for the first time in Italy in 2021 and it has been shown to be effective and safe.

Purpose: Given the novelty of the model, this focus group study aims to explore the perspectives of involved physiotherapists, general practitioners and medical specialists on the perceived efficiency and quality of the service. A qualitative design was used with two balanced multidisciplinary focus groups of 12 participants. The Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Five themes emerged from the analysis, related to the speed of both referral and intervention, tailored interventions and perceived quality: Efficiency, Perceived quality, Project implementation, Training, and Project dissemination.

Conclusion: The study findings showed that the model was appreciated by the professionals involved, although some aspect about communication between professionals and with patients/caregivers, as well as some organizational aspects, needed improvement. Further research should address the perspectives of the patients/caregivers involved.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利将物理治疗纳入初级医疗保健:焦点小组定性研究,探讨相关专业人员的观点。
简介社区物理治疗师模式是基层医疗机构中的一种随叫随到的服务,包括为慢性功能障碍患者提供四次咨询。目的:鉴于该模式的新颖性,本焦点小组研究旨在探讨参与其中的物理治疗师、全科医生和医学专家对服务效率和质量的看法。研究采用了定性设计,设立了两个平衡的多学科焦点小组,共有 12 人参加。焦点小组进行了录音和逐字记录。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析:分析得出了五个主题,分别涉及转介和干预的速度、量身定制的干预措施和感知质量:效率、感知质量、项目实施、培训和项目传播:研究结果表明,该模式受到了相关专业人员的赞赏,但在专业人员之间以及与患者/护理人员之间的沟通方面,还有一些组织方面需要改进。进一步的研究应探讨相关患者/护理人员的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of pain activity patterns, disability, body awareness, proprioception and function in individuals with and without lumbar spinal decompression surgery. Variation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis presentation and outcomes based on phenotype and physical therapy movement system diagnosis: a case series. The prevalence, characteristics, and associated factors of pain in individuals with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Association between varus thrust and foot alignment and flexibility in knee osteoarthritis. Fear of movement interacts with trunk mobility, and pain intensity to predict disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1