The impact of periampullary diverticula on cannulation and adverse events in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-10-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241279105
Arvid Gustafsson, Bobby Tingstedt, Greger Olsson
{"title":"The impact of periampullary diverticula on cannulation and adverse events in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.","authors":"Arvid Gustafsson, Bobby Tingstedt, Greger Olsson","doi":"10.1177/17562848241279105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periampullary diverticulum (PAD) is commonly encountered in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to determine whether PADs are associated with a lower success rate of cannulation and an increased risk of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using prospectively gathered nationwide registry data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Swedish registry for gallstone surgery and ERCP, we analyzed a cohort of 66,974 prospectively registered ERCP procedures performed in 2006-2021. The presence of PAD was divided into two groups based on the PAD type: Boix type 1 (the papilla located inside the PAD) and Boix types 2-3 (the papilla located either at the edge of the PAD or immediately adjacent to the PAD). The primary outcomes were the success rate of cannulation and overall adverse events within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PADs were registered in 8130 (12.1%) of ERCPs included in the study population. In total, 2114 (3.9%) patients had Boix type 1 PAD, while 5035 (8.2%) patients had Boix type 2 or 3 PAD. The chance of successful cannulation was lower in patients with type 1 PAD compared to no PAD (80.1% vs 88.7%; odds ratio: 0.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.38-0.46). No differences were seen in overall adverse events or post-ERCP pancreatitis. Adverse events occurred in 14.6% of patients with PAD type 1 and 16.0% of patients with PAD type 2 or 3, compared to 16.5% of patients without a PAD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cannulation appears less successful during ERCP when the papilla is located in the PAD (i.e., type 1). Adverse events seem not to increase with the presence of a PAD, but they could theoretically be influenced by the inability to cannulate.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562848241279105"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11470493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241279105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Periampullary diverticulum (PAD) is commonly encountered in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures.

Objectives: We sought to determine whether PADs are associated with a lower success rate of cannulation and an increased risk of adverse events.

Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using prospectively gathered nationwide registry data.

Methods: Using the Swedish registry for gallstone surgery and ERCP, we analyzed a cohort of 66,974 prospectively registered ERCP procedures performed in 2006-2021. The presence of PAD was divided into two groups based on the PAD type: Boix type 1 (the papilla located inside the PAD) and Boix types 2-3 (the papilla located either at the edge of the PAD or immediately adjacent to the PAD). The primary outcomes were the success rate of cannulation and overall adverse events within 30 days.

Results: PADs were registered in 8130 (12.1%) of ERCPs included in the study population. In total, 2114 (3.9%) patients had Boix type 1 PAD, while 5035 (8.2%) patients had Boix type 2 or 3 PAD. The chance of successful cannulation was lower in patients with type 1 PAD compared to no PAD (80.1% vs 88.7%; odds ratio: 0.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.38-0.46). No differences were seen in overall adverse events or post-ERCP pancreatitis. Adverse events occurred in 14.6% of patients with PAD type 1 and 16.0% of patients with PAD type 2 or 3, compared to 16.5% of patients without a PAD.

Conclusion: Cannulation appears less successful during ERCP when the papilla is located in the PAD (i.e., type 1). Adverse events seem not to increase with the presence of a PAD, but they could theoretically be influenced by the inability to cannulate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰周憩室对内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中插管和不良事件的影响。
背景:胰周憩室(PAD)是内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)手术中经常遇到的问题:我们试图确定胰周憩室是否与插管成功率降低和不良事件风险增加有关:设计:利用前瞻性收集的全国登记数据进行回顾性队列研究:我们利用瑞典胆结石手术和ERCP登记资料,分析了2006-2021年进行的66974例前瞻性登记的ERCP手术。根据 PAD 类型将 PAD 的存在分为两组:Boix 1 型(乳头位于 PAD 内部)和 Boix 2-3 型(乳头位于 PAD 边缘或紧邻 PAD)。主要结果是插管成功率和30天内的总体不良事件:结果:在纳入研究人群的 ERCP 中,有 8130 例(12.1%)登记有 PAD。共有 2114 例(3.9%)患者为 Boix 1 型 PAD,5035 例(8.2%)患者为 Boix 2 或 3 型 PAD。与无 PAD 患者相比,1 型 PAD 患者成功插管的几率较低(80.1% vs 88.7%;几率比:0.42,95% 置信区间:0.38-0.46)。总体不良事件或ERCP术后胰腺炎方面无差异。14.6%的1型PAD患者和16.0%的2型或3型PAD患者发生了不良事件,而无PAD患者的不良事件发生率为16.5%:结论:当乳头位于 PAD(即 1 型)时,ERCP 的插管成功率较低。不良事件似乎不会随着 PAD 的存在而增加,但理论上可能会受到无法插管的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Quality of life and burden of disease in a Mexican population with inflammatory bowel disease: an analysis of the RISE-MX trial. Association of early therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab with biologic remission and drug survival in Crohn's Disease. Clipping closure length is a crucial factor for delayed bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. OLGA and OLGIM staging systems on the risk assessment of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta‑analysis of prospective cohorts. Therapeutic potential of fecal microbiota transplantation in colorectal cancer based on gut microbiota regulation: from pathogenesis to efficacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1