The Use of a Single Risk Assessment Tool for Mortality and Numerous Hospital-Acquired Conditions.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000456
Erwin Wang, Aditya Samaroo, Joseph Weisstuch, Bret Rudy
{"title":"The Use of a Single Risk Assessment Tool for Mortality and Numerous Hospital-Acquired Conditions.","authors":"Erwin Wang, Aditya Samaroo, Joseph Weisstuch, Bret Rudy","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Quality assessment organizations leverage numerous patient safety measures to evaluate hospital performance, resulting in significant financial, administrative, and operational burdens on health systems. Low-intensity approaches that allow for reliable risk stratification of patients can reduce the required investment. The Braden score is a routinely performed bedside nursing evaluation validated to assess risk for hospital-acquired pressure injury. We hypothesized that the tool can be used to evaluate risk for other hospital-related adverse outcomes, including mortality, catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). We found that abnormal Braden scores have significant association with numerous adverse outcome measures, including mortality, CLABSI, CAUTI, and iatrogenic hypoglycemia. Because of its frequency of reevaluation, we have found preliminary evidence that leveraging this tool can reduce harm by quickly identifying the most at-risk patients for various types of iatrogenic harm. We conclude that in the face of increasing automation and technical applications, for example, artificial intelligence-driven tools, highly reliable clinician bedside physical examination and evaluation can still have significant, low-cost, and high-value impact in improving patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":"370-379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Quality assessment organizations leverage numerous patient safety measures to evaluate hospital performance, resulting in significant financial, administrative, and operational burdens on health systems. Low-intensity approaches that allow for reliable risk stratification of patients can reduce the required investment. The Braden score is a routinely performed bedside nursing evaluation validated to assess risk for hospital-acquired pressure injury. We hypothesized that the tool can be used to evaluate risk for other hospital-related adverse outcomes, including mortality, catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). We found that abnormal Braden scores have significant association with numerous adverse outcome measures, including mortality, CLABSI, CAUTI, and iatrogenic hypoglycemia. Because of its frequency of reevaluation, we have found preliminary evidence that leveraging this tool can reduce harm by quickly identifying the most at-risk patients for various types of iatrogenic harm. We conclude that in the face of increasing automation and technical applications, for example, artificial intelligence-driven tools, highly reliable clinician bedside physical examination and evaluation can still have significant, low-cost, and high-value impact in improving patient safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用单一风险评估工具评估死亡率和多种医院获得性病症。
摘要:质量评估机构利用大量患者安全措施来评估医院绩效,这给医疗系统带来了巨大的财务、行政和运营负担。对患者进行可靠风险分层的低强度方法可以减少所需的投资。布莱登评分是一种常规床旁护理评估方法,用于评估医院获得性压力损伤的风险。我们假设该工具可用于评估其他医院相关不良后果的风险,包括死亡率、导管相关尿路感染(CAUTI)和中心管路相关血流感染(CLABSI)。我们发现,布莱登评分异常与许多不良后果指标有显著关联,包括死亡率、CLABSI、CAUTI 和先天性低血糖。由于布莱登评分经常被重新评估,我们发现有初步证据表明,利用这一工具可以快速识别各种类型先天性伤害的高危患者,从而减少伤害。我们的结论是,在自动化和技术应用(如人工智能驱动的工具)不断提高的情况下,高度可靠的临床医生床旁体格检查和评估仍能在改善患者安全方面产生显著、低成本和高价值的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
期刊最新文献
Implementation of an Evidence-Based Treatment Protocol and Order Set for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome. Improving Time to Antibiotics for Long-Bone Open Fractures: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Increasing Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Resident-Run Clinic Through Partnership With Ophthalmology Clinic: A Pilot Study. Collaboration to Remove Barriers to Pump Integration With the Electronic Health Record. The Use of a Single Risk Assessment Tool for Mortality and Numerous Hospital-Acquired Conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1