A Randomized Controlled Trial on Teaching the Safe Handling of Firearms Using a Simulation-Based Assessment.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000829
Jake Hoyne, Jennifer Yee, Charles Lei, Anne V Grossestreuer, Simiao Li-Sauerwine, William Burns, Nate Olson, Matthew Pirotte, Nicole Dubosh, Andrew R Ketterer
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial on Teaching the Safe Handling of Firearms Using a Simulation-Based Assessment.","authors":"Jake Hoyne, Jennifer Yee, Charles Lei, Anne V Grossestreuer, Simiao Li-Sauerwine, William Burns, Nate Olson, Matthew Pirotte, Nicole Dubosh, Andrew R Ketterer","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency providers risk encountering firearms in the emergency department, but a minority report familiarity with handling firearms. It may be unsafe if unfamiliar, untrained providers attempt to remove a firearm from the clinical care space. This study assessed the efficacy of an educational intervention training resident physicians in this task.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five emergency medicine residency programs conducted a prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial assessing performance of safely removing a firearm from the clinical care space during a simulated patient encounter. The primary outcome was completion of critical actions previously assessed in a pilot study. Residents viewed a 5-minute educational video developed for this study detailing the principles of safely removing a firearm from the clinical care space. The training video was emailed to prospective participants in the intervention group ahead of the simulation session. Afterward, a debriefing session was held with all participants to review the safe handling of firearms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six of 170 prospective participants (38.8%) consented to participate. There were no significant differences in gender, clinical training level, environment of upbringing, confidence in handling firearms, firearm usage frequency, or prior firearm training. Twenty-nine participants handled the firearm during simulation. The intervention group performed significantly better than the control group, completing a median of 7 critical actions (interquartile range, 7-8) versus 6 critical actions (interquartile range, 5-7), P = 0.035. This effect held among participants who handle firearms outside of work and/or have prior firearms training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates how a brief educational intervention was associated with improvement in participants' ability to safely remove a firearm from a simulated clinical care space. This approach can be integrated into existing curricula, and its success suggests broad applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000829","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency providers risk encountering firearms in the emergency department, but a minority report familiarity with handling firearms. It may be unsafe if unfamiliar, untrained providers attempt to remove a firearm from the clinical care space. This study assessed the efficacy of an educational intervention training resident physicians in this task.

Methods: Five emergency medicine residency programs conducted a prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial assessing performance of safely removing a firearm from the clinical care space during a simulated patient encounter. The primary outcome was completion of critical actions previously assessed in a pilot study. Residents viewed a 5-minute educational video developed for this study detailing the principles of safely removing a firearm from the clinical care space. The training video was emailed to prospective participants in the intervention group ahead of the simulation session. Afterward, a debriefing session was held with all participants to review the safe handling of firearms.

Results: Sixty-six of 170 prospective participants (38.8%) consented to participate. There were no significant differences in gender, clinical training level, environment of upbringing, confidence in handling firearms, firearm usage frequency, or prior firearm training. Twenty-nine participants handled the firearm during simulation. The intervention group performed significantly better than the control group, completing a median of 7 critical actions (interquartile range, 7-8) versus 6 critical actions (interquartile range, 5-7), P = 0.035. This effect held among participants who handle firearms outside of work and/or have prior firearms training.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates how a brief educational intervention was associated with improvement in participants' ability to safely remove a firearm from a simulated clinical care space. This approach can be integrated into existing curricula, and its success suggests broad applicability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用模拟评估教授安全使用枪支的随机对照试验。
导言:急诊服务人员在急诊科可能会遇到枪支,但只有少数人表示熟悉处理枪支。如果不熟悉、未受过训练的医疗人员试图将枪支从临床护理空间中移出,可能会不安全。本研究评估了对住院医生进行此项任务培训的教育干预的效果:方法:五个急诊医学住院医师培训项目开展了一项前瞻性、单盲随机对照试验,评估在模拟患者就诊过程中从临床护理空间安全移除枪支的表现。主要结果是完成先前在试点研究中评估过的关键行动。住院医师观看了一段为本研究开发的 5 分钟教育视频,视频详细介绍了从临床护理空间安全移除枪支的原则。培训视频已在模拟课程开始前通过电子邮件发送给干预组的潜在参与者。之后,所有参与者进行了汇报,回顾了安全处理枪支的方法:170 名潜在参与者中有 66 人(38.8%)同意参加。在性别、临床培训水平、成长环境、对处理枪支的信心、使用枪支的频率和以前接受过的枪支培训等方面没有明显差异。29 名参与者在模拟过程中操作了枪支。干预组的表现明显优于对照组,干预组完成关键动作的中位数为 7 次(四分位数间距为 7-8 次),对照组完成关键动作的中位数为 6 次(四分位数间距为 5-7 次),P = 0.035。在工作之余处理枪支和/或以前接受过枪支培训的参与者中,这种效果也是如此:本研究表明,简短的教育干预与提高参与者从模拟临床护理空间安全移除枪支的能力有关。这种方法可以整合到现有课程中,其成功表明它具有广泛的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
期刊最新文献
Virtual Monitoring Technician Performance in High-Fidelity Simulations of Remote Patient Monitoring: An Exploratory Study. Bridging Two Worlds: A Basic Scientist's Transformative Path in Healthcare Simulation. Measuring Residents' Competence in Chest Tube Insertion on Thiel-Embalmed Bodies: A Validity Study. Call to Action: Honoring Simulated Participants and Collaborating With Simulated Participant Educators. When Simulation Becomes Reality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1