Leadership Lingo: Developing a Shared Language of Leadership Behaviors to Enrich Debriefing Conversations.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000832
Amrita Brara, Chloe Chang, Joanne Kerins, Samantha E Smith, Victoria R Tallentire
{"title":"Leadership Lingo: Developing a Shared Language of Leadership Behaviors to Enrich Debriefing Conversations.","authors":"Amrita Brara, Chloe Chang, Joanne Kerins, Samantha E Smith, Victoria R Tallentire","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Leadership in medical emergencies is variable and frequently suboptimal, contributing to poor patient care and outcomes. Simulation training can improve leadership in both simulated practice and real clinical emergencies. Thoughtful debriefing is essential. However, unclear language around leadership limits facilitators' capacity for transformative reflective discussion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Internal medicine trainees participated in simulated medical emergency scenarios. Video recordings of consenting participants were analyzed using template analysis. A priori codes from existing literature formed an initial coding template. This was modified with inductive codes from the observed behaviors to develop a taxonomy of leadership behaviors in simulated medical emergencies. The taxonomy was then transformed into an infographic, to be used as a leadership debriefing tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The taxonomy of leadership behaviors consisted of the following 4 themes: Structuring, Decision making, Supporting, and Communicating. Structuring behaviors shaped the team, ensuring that the right people were in the right place at the right time. Decision-making behaviors steered the team, setting a direction and course of action. Communicating behaviors connected the team, sharing valuable information. Supporting behaviors nurtured the team, guiding team members to perform at their optimum level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Debriefing-as-imagined is not always debriefing-as-done. A shared language of leadership can connect educators and learners, advancing critical debriefing conversations and enabling facilitators to drive meaningful reflective discussion. The use of infographics in simulation offers an opportunity to support educators in facilitating complex debriefing conversations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Leadership in medical emergencies is variable and frequently suboptimal, contributing to poor patient care and outcomes. Simulation training can improve leadership in both simulated practice and real clinical emergencies. Thoughtful debriefing is essential. However, unclear language around leadership limits facilitators' capacity for transformative reflective discussion.

Methods: Internal medicine trainees participated in simulated medical emergency scenarios. Video recordings of consenting participants were analyzed using template analysis. A priori codes from existing literature formed an initial coding template. This was modified with inductive codes from the observed behaviors to develop a taxonomy of leadership behaviors in simulated medical emergencies. The taxonomy was then transformed into an infographic, to be used as a leadership debriefing tool.

Results: The taxonomy of leadership behaviors consisted of the following 4 themes: Structuring, Decision making, Supporting, and Communicating. Structuring behaviors shaped the team, ensuring that the right people were in the right place at the right time. Decision-making behaviors steered the team, setting a direction and course of action. Communicating behaviors connected the team, sharing valuable information. Supporting behaviors nurtured the team, guiding team members to perform at their optimum level.

Conclusions: Debriefing-as-imagined is not always debriefing-as-done. A shared language of leadership can connect educators and learners, advancing critical debriefing conversations and enabling facilitators to drive meaningful reflective discussion. The use of infographics in simulation offers an opportunity to support educators in facilitating complex debriefing conversations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
领导语言:发展共同的领导行为语言,丰富汇报对话。
导言:医疗急救中的领导能力参差不齐,而且经常不尽如人意,导致病人护理和治疗效果不佳。模拟训练可以提高模拟实践和真实临床紧急情况下的领导能力。深思熟虑的汇报至关重要。然而,围绕领导力的不明确语言限制了主持人进行变革性反思讨论的能力:方法:内科受训人员参与模拟医疗急救场景。方法:内科受训人员参与了模拟医疗急救情景,并使用模板分析法分析了参与者同意的视频录像。现有文献中的先验编码构成了最初的编码模板。通过对观察到的行为进行归纳编码,形成了模拟医疗急救中领导行为的分类标准。然后将分类法转化为信息图表,用作领导力汇报工具:领导行为分类法包括以下 4 个主题:结果:领导行为分类法包括以下四个主题:构建、决策、支持和沟通。构建行为塑造了团队,确保正确的人在正确的时间出现在正确的地点。决策行为引导团队,确定方向和行动方针。沟通行为连接团队,分享有价值的信息。支持行为培养团队,引导团队成员发挥最佳水平:想象中的汇报并不总是实际的汇报。领导力的共同语言可以将教育者和学习者联系起来,推动关键的汇报对话,并使主持人能够推动有意义的反思性讨论。在模拟教学中使用信息图表为支持教育者促进复杂的汇报对话提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
期刊最新文献
Building Global Partnerships: A Qualitative Exploration of In-Person Training for HealthCare Simulation Educators Working in Low-Resource Settings. Using Mobile and Remote Simulation as a Research Methodology for Health Care Delivery Research. A Scoping Review of Interprofessional Simulation-Based Team Training Programs. Intrinsic Factors and Psychological Safety Among Nursing Students During Simulation-Based Learning-A Correlational Design. Discriminative Ability of Dye Injected Into a Meat Model to Determine Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Injection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1