Effects of minimum monitor unit per dynamic control point on intensity‐modulated radiotherapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective study

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Medical Dosimetry Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2024.09.003
Xiwei Chen , Yuan Cheng , Weiwei Wu , Yadi He , Yangming Zhang , Liwan Han , Gaokui He , Zhenghuan Li
{"title":"Effects of minimum monitor unit per dynamic control point on intensity‐modulated radiotherapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective study","authors":"Xiwei Chen ,&nbsp;Yuan Cheng ,&nbsp;Weiwei Wu ,&nbsp;Yadi He ,&nbsp;Yangming Zhang ,&nbsp;Liwan Han ,&nbsp;Gaokui He ,&nbsp;Zhenghuan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.meddos.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study aimed to improve the dose distribution of radiotherapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) by comparing the effects of various minimum monitor units (MUs) per dynamic control point (MMCP) values on the quality and execution efficiency of dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning. Thirty-four clinically implemented dynamic IMRT plans for patients with NPC were retrospectively selected. In total, 170 plans were obtained by modifying only the MMCP values (set as 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9) in the treatment planning system's (TPS) optimization parameters. These plans were divided into 5 groups. Analyzing the effects of MMCP on the target and organ dose at risk (OAR), also the execution efficiency of the treatment plan in each group and using a quality score system, we conducted an objective quantitative study of the dose distribution and execution efficiency. The target dose evaluation indicators (target coverage (TC), homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI)) of all IMRT plans showed a trend of variation with an increase in MMCP values, and the difference was statistically significant when MMCP values were 5, 7, 9, and 1 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). With an increase in MMCP, the dose to OAR slightly increased, but the difference was not statistically significant (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). With an increase in MMCP, the average number of MUs per segment significantly increased (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). The groups based on MMCP values of 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 received quality score system of 1.188, 1.180, 1.171, 0.987, and 1.184, respectively, with the MMCP7 group achieving the lowest score, indicating that this plan had the highest overall quality. The MMCP value for dynamic IMRT planning in the Monaco TPS for patients with NPC should be set to 7 to achieve fewer segments, the best execution efficiency without significantly deteriorating the target and OAR dose.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49837,"journal":{"name":"Medical Dosimetry","volume":"50 1","pages":"Pages 96-101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958394724000463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to improve the dose distribution of radiotherapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) by comparing the effects of various minimum monitor units (MUs) per dynamic control point (MMCP) values on the quality and execution efficiency of dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning. Thirty-four clinically implemented dynamic IMRT plans for patients with NPC were retrospectively selected. In total, 170 plans were obtained by modifying only the MMCP values (set as 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9) in the treatment planning system's (TPS) optimization parameters. These plans were divided into 5 groups. Analyzing the effects of MMCP on the target and organ dose at risk (OAR), also the execution efficiency of the treatment plan in each group and using a quality score system, we conducted an objective quantitative study of the dose distribution and execution efficiency. The target dose evaluation indicators (target coverage (TC), homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI)) of all IMRT plans showed a trend of variation with an increase in MMCP values, and the difference was statistically significant when MMCP values were 5, 7, 9, and 1 (p < 0.05). With an increase in MMCP, the dose to OAR slightly increased, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). With an increase in MMCP, the average number of MUs per segment significantly increased (p < 0.01). The groups based on MMCP values of 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 received quality score system of 1.188, 1.180, 1.171, 0.987, and 1.184, respectively, with the MMCP7 group achieving the lowest score, indicating that this plan had the highest overall quality. The MMCP value for dynamic IMRT planning in the Monaco TPS for patients with NPC should be set to 7 to achieve fewer segments, the best execution efficiency without significantly deteriorating the target and OAR dose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每个动态控制点的最小监控单元对鼻咽癌调强放射治疗计划的影响:一项回顾性研究。
本研究旨在通过比较不同的每个动态控制点最小监测单位(MUs)值对动态调强放射治疗(IMRT)计划的质量和执行效率的影响,改善鼻咽癌(NPC)放射治疗计划的剂量分布。我们回顾性地选取了 34 个为鼻咽癌患者实施的临床动态 IMRT 计划。通过修改治疗计划系统(TPS)优化参数中的 MMCP 值(设置为 1、3、5、7 和 9),共获得 170 个计划。这些方案被分为 5 组。通过分析 MMCP 对目标剂量和器官危险剂量(OAR)的影响,以及各组治疗计划的执行效率,并使用质量评分系统,我们对剂量分布和执行效率进行了客观的定量研究。所有 IMRT 方案的靶剂量评价指标(靶覆盖率 (TC)、均匀性指数 (HI) 和符合性指数 (CI))随着 MMCP 值的增加呈变化趋势,当 MMCP 值为 5、7、9 和 1 时,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。随着 MMCP 的增加,OAR 的剂量也略有增加,但差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。随着 MMCP 的增加,每个区段的平均 MU 数显著增加(p < 0.01)。基于 MMCP 值为 1、3、5、7 和 9 的各组质量评分系统分别为 1.188、1.180、1.171、0.987 和 1.184,其中 MMCP7 组得分最低,表明该计划的整体质量最高。在摩纳哥 TPS 中,鼻咽癌患者动态 IMRT 计划的 MMCP 值应设置为 7,以实现更少的区段、最佳的执行效率,同时不会明显降低靶区和 OAR 剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Dosimetry
Medical Dosimetry 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Medical Dosimetry, the official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, is the key source of information on new developments for the medical dosimetrist. Practical and comprehensive in coverage, the journal features original contributions and review articles by medical dosimetrists, oncologists, physicists, and radiation therapy technologists on clinical applications and techniques of external beam, interstitial, intracavitary and intraluminal irradiation in cancer management. Articles dealing primarily with physics will be reviewed by a specially appointed team of experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Impact of variable RBE in prostate cancer IMPT planning on normal tissue complications. A phantom geometry approach to develop a RapidPlan knowledge-based planning model. Preliminary comparison of scalp-sparing effects between 3DCRT and VMAT in pediatric and AYA craniospinal irradiation across photon energies: A phantom-based study. Total body irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy: a single-scan phantom study. Response to "Critical appraisal of 'plan comparison of left-sided breast postmastectomy radiotherapy: Halcyon IMRT and VMAT plan versus TrueBeam IMRT plan'".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1