A retrospective multicenter study of operating room extubation and extubation timing after cardiac surgery

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.057
Eric W. Etchill MD, MPH , Xiaoting Wu PhD , Diane Alejo BA , Clifford E. Fonner BS , Carol Ling PhD , Neil Worrall MD , Eric Lehr MD, PhD , Francis Pagani MD, PhD , Terri Haber MPH , Patty Theurer MPH , Jeannie Collins-Brandon BS , Ravi Hira MD , James Brevig MD , Erika Mallory MPH , Charles Maynard PhD , Donald S. Likosky PhD , Glenn J.R. Whitman MD , IMPROVE Network
{"title":"A retrospective multicenter study of operating room extubation and extubation timing after cardiac surgery","authors":"Eric W. Etchill MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Xiaoting Wu PhD ,&nbsp;Diane Alejo BA ,&nbsp;Clifford E. Fonner BS ,&nbsp;Carol Ling PhD ,&nbsp;Neil Worrall MD ,&nbsp;Eric Lehr MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Francis Pagani MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Terri Haber MPH ,&nbsp;Patty Theurer MPH ,&nbsp;Jeannie Collins-Brandon BS ,&nbsp;Ravi Hira MD ,&nbsp;James Brevig MD ,&nbsp;Erika Mallory MPH ,&nbsp;Charles Maynard PhD ,&nbsp;Donald S. Likosky PhD ,&nbsp;Glenn J.R. Whitman MD ,&nbsp;IMPROVE Network","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In an effort to enhance recovery after cardiac surgery, intraoperative extubation has been targeted as possibly beneficial. This multicenter cohort study aimed to assess this by evaluating the outcomes of operating room (OR) extubation versus extubation within 6 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) arrival (early ICU extubation). Furthermore, we assessed time to ICU extubation and mortality and morbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery across 79 hospitals between 2011 and 2020 were included to (1) compare outcomes among OR extubation and early ICU extubation patients and (2) assess time to overall ICU extubation and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall study cohort comprised 163,982 patients, including 95,982 patients (OR extubation: n = 2529 [2.6%] and early ICU extubation: n = 93,453 [97.4%]) who underwent comparison of OR with early ICU extubation. After overlap weighting, patients with OR extubation had longer OR times (5.6 vs 5.1 hours, <em>P</em> &lt; . 0001) and greater rates of reintubation (5.2% vs 2.9%, <em>P</em> = .003), prolonged ventilation (3% vs 2%, <em>P</em> = .021), reoperation for bleeding (1.5% vs 0.7%, <em>P</em> &lt; .01), pneumonia (1.9% vs 1.1%, <em>P</em> &lt; .006), and greater in-hospital mortality on multivariable regression (odds ratio, 1.34, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Patients with OR extubation at centers with low OR extubation rates (&lt;10%, n = 60) had greater mortality (odds ratio, 1.6, <em>P</em> = .001). Beyond 22 hours of postoperative ICU ventilation, the risk of morbidity and mortality increased significantly.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Few patients who undergo cardiac surgery are extubated in the OR, which is associated with no clinical benefit and with increased morbidity. Cardiac surgery programs should reconsider OR extubation after cardiopulmonary bypass. In addition, increased intubation time, in particular &gt;22 hours, is associated with an increase in adverse outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"170 2","pages":"Pages 606-615.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522324009280","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In an effort to enhance recovery after cardiac surgery, intraoperative extubation has been targeted as possibly beneficial. This multicenter cohort study aimed to assess this by evaluating the outcomes of operating room (OR) extubation versus extubation within 6 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) arrival (early ICU extubation). Furthermore, we assessed time to ICU extubation and mortality and morbidity.

Methods

Patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery across 79 hospitals between 2011 and 2020 were included to (1) compare outcomes among OR extubation and early ICU extubation patients and (2) assess time to overall ICU extubation and outcomes.

Results

The overall study cohort comprised 163,982 patients, including 95,982 patients (OR extubation: n = 2529 [2.6%] and early ICU extubation: n = 93,453 [97.4%]) who underwent comparison of OR with early ICU extubation. After overlap weighting, patients with OR extubation had longer OR times (5.6 vs 5.1 hours, P < . 0001) and greater rates of reintubation (5.2% vs 2.9%, P = .003), prolonged ventilation (3% vs 2%, P = .021), reoperation for bleeding (1.5% vs 0.7%, P < .01), pneumonia (1.9% vs 1.1%, P < .006), and greater in-hospital mortality on multivariable regression (odds ratio, 1.34, P < .001). Patients with OR extubation at centers with low OR extubation rates (<10%, n = 60) had greater mortality (odds ratio, 1.6, P = .001). Beyond 22 hours of postoperative ICU ventilation, the risk of morbidity and mortality increased significantly.

Conclusions

Few patients who undergo cardiac surgery are extubated in the OR, which is associated with no clinical benefit and with increased morbidity. Cardiac surgery programs should reconsider OR extubation after cardiopulmonary bypass. In addition, increased intubation time, in particular >22 hours, is associated with an increase in adverse outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项关于心脏手术后手术室拔管和拔管时机的多中心回顾性研究。
背景:为了促进心脏手术后的恢复,术中拔管被认为可能有益。这项多中心队列研究旨在通过评估手术室拔管与重症监护室到达后六小时内拔管(重症监护室早期拔管)的结果来评估这一点。此外,我们还评估了ICU拔管的时间以及死亡率和发病率:纳入了 2011-2020 年间在 79 家医院接受泵上心脏手术的患者,目的是:1)比较手术室拔管患者和重症监护室早期拔管患者的预后;2)评估重症监护室整体拔管时间和预后:整个研究队列包括 163,982 名患者,其中 95,982 名患者[[ 手术室拔管:n= 2,529 (2.6%),ICU 早期拔管:n= 93,453 (97.4%)]进行了手术室拔管与 ICU 早期拔管的比较。经过重叠加权后,手术室拔管患者的手术时间更长(5.6 对 5.1 小时,P < 0.0001),再次插管率更高(5.2% 对 2.9%,P = 0.003),通气时间更长(3% 对 2%,P = 0.021)、因出血再次手术(1.5% vs. 0.7%,P<0.01)、肺炎(1.9% vs. 1.1%,P<0.006),以及经多变量回归的院内死亡率更高(OR 1.34,P<0.001)。在手术室拔管率较低(< 10%,N=60)的手术室拔管患者死亡率较高(比值比 1.6,P = 0.001)。术后在重症监护室通气超过 22 小时后,发病率和死亡率风险显著增加:很少有心脏手术患者在手术室拔管,这不仅没有临床益处,还会增加发病率。心脏手术项目应重新考虑心肺旁路术后的手术室拔管。此外,插管时间的延长,尤其是超过 22 小时,与不良预后的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
期刊最新文献
Refining comparative efficacy: Methodologic considerations for transapical beating-heart myectomy in pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Micro-invasive, off-pump, trans-ventricular neochordae implantation in recurrent mitral valve regurgitation after open heart surgical repair. Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: persistent recurrence risk highlights the need for stratified management. Oxygen Extraction Trajectories During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Impact Postoperative Outcomes in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Primary biventricular repair in borderline left ventricle neonates: Considerations on outcome definition and model validation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1