The impact of the Roe v. Wade overturn on birth control prescriptions and sterilisation procedures in rural NC.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1080/13625187.2024.2409231
Eloise Joubert, Todd Anderson, Valeria Barreto-Nadal, David Schutzer
{"title":"The impact of the <i>Roe v. Wade</i> overturn on birth control prescriptions and sterilisation procedures in rural NC.","authors":"Eloise Joubert, Todd Anderson, Valeria Barreto-Nadal, David Schutzer","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2024.2409231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/introduction: </strong>On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court overturned the 1973 verdict in the <i>Roe v. Wade</i> legal suit that had established the constitutional right to medical abortion [1]. With the right to abortion now being left to the states, many restrictions regarding abortion procedures are being established [2]. We aim to evaluate whether this has led to an increase in the number of birth control prescriptions and sterilisation procedures at Cape Fear Valley Medical Centre in rural North Carolina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SlicerDicer program within EPIC medical records database was used to retrieve the records of all women that had an obstetrics and gynaecology appointment with Cape Fear Valley Health System between 11/01/21-12/31/2022 for contraception. The data was sorted into race/ethnicity, age, and types of birth control. Principal outcomes measured the trends in birth control prescription or sterilisation procedure appointments before and after the overturn of <i>Roe v. Wade</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contraceptive pill prescriptions decreased from 51.70% to 32.40%. IUD insertions decreased from 39.40% to 11.30%. Injectable birth control remained consistent, at approximately 16%. Nexplanon implantations dropped from 20.60% to 9.70%. Lastly, sterilisation procedures increased from 6.7% to 10.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Majority of birth control prescriptions decreased following the overturn of <i>Roe v. Wade</i>, except for sterilisation, which increased by 4.0%. This may indicate that women are now looking for more permanent birth control options after the overturn of <i>Roe v. Wade</i>. Future research should investigate whether similar trends of increasing prevalence of sterilisation procedures is seen throughout the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":50491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"294-297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2024.2409231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/introduction: On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court overturned the 1973 verdict in the Roe v. Wade legal suit that had established the constitutional right to medical abortion [1]. With the right to abortion now being left to the states, many restrictions regarding abortion procedures are being established [2]. We aim to evaluate whether this has led to an increase in the number of birth control prescriptions and sterilisation procedures at Cape Fear Valley Medical Centre in rural North Carolina.

Methods: SlicerDicer program within EPIC medical records database was used to retrieve the records of all women that had an obstetrics and gynaecology appointment with Cape Fear Valley Health System between 11/01/21-12/31/2022 for contraception. The data was sorted into race/ethnicity, age, and types of birth control. Principal outcomes measured the trends in birth control prescription or sterilisation procedure appointments before and after the overturn of Roe v. Wade.

Results: Contraceptive pill prescriptions decreased from 51.70% to 32.40%. IUD insertions decreased from 39.40% to 11.30%. Injectable birth control remained consistent, at approximately 16%. Nexplanon implantations dropped from 20.60% to 9.70%. Lastly, sterilisation procedures increased from 6.7% to 10.7%.

Conclusion: Majority of birth control prescriptions decreased following the overturn of Roe v. Wade, except for sterilisation, which increased by 4.0%. This may indicate that women are now looking for more permanent birth control options after the overturn of Roe v. Wade. Future research should investigate whether similar trends of increasing prevalence of sterilisation procedures is seen throughout the United States.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推翻 "罗伊诉韦德案 "对北卡罗来纳州农村地区节育处方和绝育手术的影响。
背景/引言:2022 年 6 月 24 日,最高法院推翻了 1973 年罗伊诉韦德案(Roe v. Wade)的判决,该案确立了医疗堕胎的宪法权利[1]。现在,堕胎权已交由各州行使,各州正在制定许多有关堕胎程序的限制措施[2]。我们的目的是评估这是否会导致北卡罗来纳州农村地区的 Cape Fear Valley 医疗中心的节育处方和绝育手术数量增加:方法:使用 EPIC 医疗记录数据库中的 SlicerDicer 程序,检索所有在 11/01/21-12/31/2022 年期间在开普费尔谷医疗系统接受过妇产科预约的妇女的避孕记录。数据按种族/民族、年龄和节育类型进行了分类。主要结果衡量了罗伊诉韦德案被推翻前后避孕处方或绝育手术预约的趋势:结果:避孕药处方从 51.70% 降至 32.40%。放置宫内节育器的比例从 39.40% 降至 11.30%。注射避孕药的比例保持不变,约为 16%。Nexplanon植入率从20.60%降至9.70%。最后,绝育手术从 6.7% 增加到 10.7%:除绝育手术增加了 4.0% 外,大多数节育处方在 "罗伊诉韦德 "案被推翻后都有所减少。这可能表明,在 "罗伊诉韦德 "案被推翻后,妇女们开始寻求更持久的节育方法。未来的研究应调查全美国是否都出现了类似的绝育手术普及率上升趋势:我们旨在评估最高法院推翻 "罗伊诉韦德案 "法律诉讼对北卡罗来纳州农村地区避孕决定的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material.
期刊最新文献
The pre-Roe legal framework: a dissecting study of the evolution of abortion laws and their socio-legal implications. Patient acceptability of intra-amniotic digoxin versus intracardiac lidocaine for inducing foetal demise prior to second trimester medical abortion: a prospective cohort. The prolonged-release oral formulations: a new era in hormonal contraception technology? Family planning and contraception in people with multiple sclerosis: perspectives for obstetricians, gynaecologists, and other health care professionals involved in reproductive planning. Knowledge of contraceptive methods among deaf women: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1