{"title":"Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Adults with Osteogenic Sarcoma.","authors":"Michael J Robinson, Elizabeth J Davis","doi":"10.1007/s11864-024-01269-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in adolescents and adults. The 5-year survival rate is 65% when localized; however, survival drops dramatically to 10-20% in cases of metastatic disease. Therapy for osteosarcoma saw its first significant advancement in the 1970-80's, with the introduction of our current standard of care, consisting of the neo/adjuvant treatment regimen methotrexate, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cisplatin (collectively referred to as MAP) and surgical resection. Since MAP, development of a better therapeutic approach has stalled, creating a plateau in patient outcomes that has persisted for 40 years. Despite substantial research into a variety of pathways for novel treatment options, clinical trials have not produced sizeable improvements in outcomes. In this article, we discuss our current neoadjuvant standard of care therapy, followed by a review of contemporary therapeutic options, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Lastly, we consider the challenges hindering the success of novel treatment options and future research directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1366-1373"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-024-01269-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Opinion statement: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in adolescents and adults. The 5-year survival rate is 65% when localized; however, survival drops dramatically to 10-20% in cases of metastatic disease. Therapy for osteosarcoma saw its first significant advancement in the 1970-80's, with the introduction of our current standard of care, consisting of the neo/adjuvant treatment regimen methotrexate, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cisplatin (collectively referred to as MAP) and surgical resection. Since MAP, development of a better therapeutic approach has stalled, creating a plateau in patient outcomes that has persisted for 40 years. Despite substantial research into a variety of pathways for novel treatment options, clinical trials have not produced sizeable improvements in outcomes. In this article, we discuss our current neoadjuvant standard of care therapy, followed by a review of contemporary therapeutic options, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Lastly, we consider the challenges hindering the success of novel treatment options and future research directions.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to review the most important, recently published treatment option advances in the field of oncology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to facilitate worldwide approaches to cancer treatment.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as endocrine tumors, lymphomas, neuro-oncology, and cancers of the breast, head and neck, lung, skin, gastrointestinal tract, and genitourinary region. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known oncologists, and an international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.