Evaluating trends in radical prostatectomy approach and 30-day complication rate in Ontario from 2010-2019.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.5489/cuaj.8636
Nickan Motamedi, Andrew McClure, Nicholas Power, Stephen Pautler, Lilian Gien, Blayne Welk, Jacob McGee
{"title":"Evaluating trends in radical prostatectomy approach and 30-day complication rate in Ontario from 2010-2019.","authors":"Nickan Motamedi, Andrew McClure, Nicholas Power, Stephen Pautler, Lilian Gien, Blayne Welk, Jacob McGee","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer has changed over the years with the advent of minimally invasive (MIRP) approaches, which includes robotic-assisted RP (RARP). The MIRP approaches have been shown to reduce complication rate, but there remain barriers to adoption. The objective of this study was to quantitatively describe the trend in the RP approach in Ontario, and to assess the trend in complication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study including all men who underwent RP for prostate cancer in Ontario from 2010-2019. We used administrative data from Ontario's health databases to gather surgical outcome data. Our primary outcomes were the annualized frequency of RP by surgical approach and annualized 30-day composite complication rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 22 118 patients were included in the analysis over the study period. There was a trend away from retropubic (RRP) frequency over the study period (80.3% of cases in fiscal year [FY] 2010 to 55.6% in FY 2018) and towards RARP approach (6.8% of cases in FY 2010 and 36.7% in FY 2018). The most common complication was blood transfusion at 6.26%, which saw a downtrend over the study period (7.96% FY 2010, 3.47% FY 2018). The odds ratio for 30-day complication for open RP compared to MIRP was 1.74 (95% confidence interval 1.57-1.92, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Ontario, there has been a steady shift away from RRP and towards RARP. Minimally invasive approaches portend a significantly lower complication rate, likely driven by a lower blood transfusion rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer has changed over the years with the advent of minimally invasive (MIRP) approaches, which includes robotic-assisted RP (RARP). The MIRP approaches have been shown to reduce complication rate, but there remain barriers to adoption. The objective of this study was to quantitatively describe the trend in the RP approach in Ontario, and to assess the trend in complication rates.

Methods: We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study including all men who underwent RP for prostate cancer in Ontario from 2010-2019. We used administrative data from Ontario's health databases to gather surgical outcome data. Our primary outcomes were the annualized frequency of RP by surgical approach and annualized 30-day composite complication rate.

Results: In total, 22 118 patients were included in the analysis over the study period. There was a trend away from retropubic (RRP) frequency over the study period (80.3% of cases in fiscal year [FY] 2010 to 55.6% in FY 2018) and towards RARP approach (6.8% of cases in FY 2010 and 36.7% in FY 2018). The most common complication was blood transfusion at 6.26%, which saw a downtrend over the study period (7.96% FY 2010, 3.47% FY 2018). The odds ratio for 30-day complication for open RP compared to MIRP was 1.74 (95% confidence interval 1.57-1.92, p<0.001).

Conclusions: In Ontario, there has been a steady shift away from RRP and towards RARP. Minimally invasive approaches portend a significantly lower complication rate, likely driven by a lower blood transfusion rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 2010-2019 年安大略省根治性前列腺切除术方法和 30 天并发症发生率的趋势。
简介:随着包括机器人辅助前列腺根治术(RARP)在内的微创前列腺切除术(MIRP)的出现,前列腺癌根治术(RP)也发生了变化。MIRP方法已被证明能降低并发症的发生率,但在应用上仍存在障碍。本研究旨在定量描述安大略省 RP 方法的发展趋势,并评估并发症发生率的趋势:我们开展了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,研究对象包括 2010-2019 年期间在安大略省接受前列腺癌前列腺电切术的所有男性。我们使用安大略省健康数据库中的管理数据来收集手术结果数据。我们的主要结果是按手术方式划分的前列腺癌根治术年化频率和30天年化综合并发症发生率:在研究期间,共有 22 118 名患者纳入分析。在研究期间,出现了从耻骨后(RRP)频率(2010 财年为 80.3%,2018 财年为 55.6%)向 RARP 方法(2010 财年为 6.8%,2018 财年为 36.7%)转变的趋势。最常见的并发症是输血,占 6.26%,在研究期间呈下降趋势(2010 财政年度为 7.96%,2018 财政年度为 3.47%)。与MIRP相比,开放式RP的30天并发症几率比为1.74(95%置信区间为1.57-1.92,p结论:在安大略省,从 RRP 逐步转向 RARP。微创方法预示着并发症发生率会大大降低,这可能是由较低的输血率驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
期刊最新文献
Case - Emergent management of severe penile and scrotal edema due to prolonged metallic ring entrapment. Case - Ureteric entrapment following oblique lateral interbody fusion. Increased oscillation rate may improve morcellation efficiency in HoLEP. Population-based dietary risks for kidney stones: Implications for dietary counseling and prevention. Predicting cancer detection rates from multiparametric prostate MRI: Beyond the PI-RADS classification system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1