Impact of pre-treatment counselling on decisional regret of prostate cancer survivors: Cross-sectional analysis of patient-reported experience following diagnosis or treatment.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.5489/cuaj.8918
Thomas M Southall, David Chung, Jasmir G Nayak, Premal Patel
{"title":"Impact of pre-treatment counselling on decisional regret of prostate cancer survivors: Cross-sectional analysis of patient-reported experience following diagnosis or treatment.","authors":"Thomas M Southall, David Chung, Jasmir G Nayak, Premal Patel","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) impacts patient lives beyond oncologic concerns alone. PCa survivorship entails all impacts of PCa, from time of diagnosis to end of life. This may include decision regret (DR). We aimed to determine survivor experiences from a functional perspective throughout survivorship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our cross-sectional survey was circulated to all members of the Manitoba Prostate Cancer Support Group. Questions explored patient understanding of functional impacts concerning treatment. Survey items included binary and Likert scale questions, and an open-answered question asking how care may be improved. Responses were used to identify predictors of DR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 514 patients received our survey with a response rate of 23.7% (n=122). Most survivors were offered radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy, at 73.0% and 63.9%, respectively; 14.9% reported lacking understanding of treatment impact on erections. Similarly, 11.5% reported lacking understanding of treatment on urinary continence. Predictors of DR included treatment with RP and low pre-treatment understanding of potential erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCa survivors are at high risk of DR, particularly those who undergo treatment with RP and those who identify as having low pre-treatment understanding of potential ED and urinary incontinence. Virtual care did not impact DR. Results highlight the importance of thorough counselling on functional aspects of PCa management prior to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) impacts patient lives beyond oncologic concerns alone. PCa survivorship entails all impacts of PCa, from time of diagnosis to end of life. This may include decision regret (DR). We aimed to determine survivor experiences from a functional perspective throughout survivorship.

Methods: Our cross-sectional survey was circulated to all members of the Manitoba Prostate Cancer Support Group. Questions explored patient understanding of functional impacts concerning treatment. Survey items included binary and Likert scale questions, and an open-answered question asking how care may be improved. Responses were used to identify predictors of DR.

Results: A total of 514 patients received our survey with a response rate of 23.7% (n=122). Most survivors were offered radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy, at 73.0% and 63.9%, respectively; 14.9% reported lacking understanding of treatment impact on erections. Similarly, 11.5% reported lacking understanding of treatment on urinary continence. Predictors of DR included treatment with RP and low pre-treatment understanding of potential erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence.

Conclusions: PCa survivors are at high risk of DR, particularly those who undergo treatment with RP and those who identify as having low pre-treatment understanding of potential ED and urinary incontinence. Virtual care did not impact DR. Results highlight the importance of thorough counselling on functional aspects of PCa management prior to treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗前咨询对前列腺癌幸存者决策后悔的影响:诊断或治疗后患者报告经历的横断面分析。
导言:前列腺癌(PCa)对患者生活的影响不仅限于肿瘤方面。前列腺癌患者的生存期包括前列腺癌从确诊到生命终结的所有影响。这可能包括决定后悔(DR)。我们旨在从功能角度确定幸存者在整个生存期的经历:我们向马尼托巴前列腺癌支持小组的所有成员分发了横向调查问卷。调查问题探讨了患者对治疗对功能影响的理解。调查项目包括二进制和李克特量表问题,以及一个询问如何改善护理的开放式问题。调查结果:共有 514 名患者接受了我们的调查,回复率为 23.7%(n=122)。大多数幸存者接受了根治性前列腺切除术(RP)或放射治疗,比例分别为 73.0% 和 63.9%;14.9% 的幸存者表示不了解治疗对勃起的影响。同样,11.5%的人表示不了解治疗对排尿的影响。DR的预测因素包括RP治疗以及治疗前对潜在的勃起功能障碍(ED)和尿失禁了解较少:结论:PCa 幸存者罹患 DR 的风险很高,尤其是那些接受 RP 治疗的患者,以及那些在治疗前对潜在 ED 和尿失禁了解较少的患者。虚拟治疗不会影响DR。研究结果凸显了在治疗前就PCa功能管理方面进行全面咨询的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
期刊最新文献
Case - Emergent management of severe penile and scrotal edema due to prolonged metallic ring entrapment. Case - Ureteric entrapment following oblique lateral interbody fusion. Increased oscillation rate may improve morcellation efficiency in HoLEP. Population-based dietary risks for kidney stones: Implications for dietary counseling and prevention. Predicting cancer detection rates from multiparametric prostate MRI: Beyond the PI-RADS classification system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1