Comparison of microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on different orthodontic aligners.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.08.010
Aylin Pasaoglu Bozkurt, Mehmet Demirci, Pelin Erdogan, Emre Kayalar
{"title":"Comparison of microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on different orthodontic aligners.","authors":"Aylin Pasaoglu Bozkurt, Mehmet Demirci, Pelin Erdogan, Emre Kayalar","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare and evaluate time-dependent biofilm formation and microbial adhesion on 6 different clear aligner systems: Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif), Clarity (3M ESPE Maplewood, Minn), ClearCorrect (Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland), Smartee (Smartee Denti-Technology, Shanghai, China), Orthero (Orthero, Istanbul, Turkey) and Graphy (Graphy Inc, Seoul, South Korea).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (ATCC 4356) were used to evaluate the microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on orthodontic clear aligners at the 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 168, and 240 hours. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (Greenhouse-Geisser) test and post-hoc Bonferroni T2 tests were used for statistical evaluation. The statistical significance level was set at P <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that more bacterial formation occurred on ClearCorrect than on Smartee at 120, 168, and 240 hours (P <0.05). It was observed more biofilm formation at 168 hours on Graphy than on Smartee (P <0.05). It was found that S mutans + L acidophilus formed more biofilm at 120 and 168 hours on Graphy than on Invisalign (P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated biofilm formation across all materials carries substantial clinical implications. Orthodontists and patients should remain aware of the increased risk of microbial colonization with extended aligner usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"47-62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.08.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to compare and evaluate time-dependent biofilm formation and microbial adhesion on 6 different clear aligner systems: Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif), Clarity (3M ESPE Maplewood, Minn), ClearCorrect (Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland), Smartee (Smartee Denti-Technology, Shanghai, China), Orthero (Orthero, Istanbul, Turkey) and Graphy (Graphy Inc, Seoul, South Korea).

Methods: Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (ATCC 4356) were used to evaluate the microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on orthodontic clear aligners at the 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 168, and 240 hours. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (Greenhouse-Geisser) test and post-hoc Bonferroni T2 tests were used for statistical evaluation. The statistical significance level was set at P <0.05.

Results: It was found that more bacterial formation occurred on ClearCorrect than on Smartee at 120, 168, and 240 hours (P <0.05). It was observed more biofilm formation at 168 hours on Graphy than on Smartee (P <0.05). It was found that S mutans + L acidophilus formed more biofilm at 120 and 168 hours on Graphy than on Invisalign (P <0.05).

Conclusions: Elevated biofilm formation across all materials carries substantial clinical implications. Orthodontists and patients should remain aware of the increased risk of microbial colonization with extended aligner usage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同正畸矫治器上微生物粘附和生物膜形成的比较。
简介:本研究旨在比较和评估 6 种不同的透明矫治器系统上随时间变化的生物膜形成和微生物附着情况:Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif)、Clarity (3M ESPE Maplewood, Minn)、ClearCorrect (Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland)、Smartee (Smartee Denti-Technology, Shanghai, China)、Orthero (Orthero, Istanbul, Turkey)和Graphy (Graphy Inc, Seoul, South Korea):方法:使用变异链球菌(ATCC 25175)和嗜酸乳杆菌(ATCC 4356)来评估0、24、48、72、96、120、168和240小时正畸透明矫治器上的微生物粘附和生物膜形成情况。统计评估采用了双向重复测量方差分析(Greenhouse-Geisser)检验和事后 Bonferroni T2 检验。统计显著性水平设定为 P 结果:结果发现,在 120、168 和 240 小时内,在 ClearCorrect 上形成的细菌比在 Smartee 上形成的细菌多(P 结论):所有材料的生物膜形成率都很高,这对临床有很大的影响。正畸医生和患者应始终意识到长时间使用矫治器会增加微生物定植的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
432
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.
期刊最新文献
All eyes are on us. Assessment of deep learning technique for fully automated mandibular segmentation. Author's response. Author's response. Author's response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1