Factors Associated With Permanent Pacemaker Placement After Tricuspid Valve Operations.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.042
Salman Zaheer, Sari D Holmes, Emily Rodriguez, Nolan M Winicki, Emily Larson, Rachael Quinn, Gorav Ailawadi, A Marc Gillinov, James S Gammie
{"title":"Factors Associated With Permanent Pacemaker Placement After Tricuspid Valve Operations.","authors":"Salman Zaheer, Sari D Holmes, Emily Rodriguez, Nolan M Winicki, Emily Larson, Rachael Quinn, Gorav Ailawadi, A Marc Gillinov, James S Gammie","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation are common after tricuspid valve operations, although the incidence is variable. This study investigated contemporary rates of and risk factors for a PPM after tricuspid operations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database was used to identify patients with tricuspid repair or replacement from 2011 to 2020. Factors independently associated with the risk of a postoperative PPM during the index hospital admission were examined using multivariable logistic regression with a complete case approach. Annualized hospital and surgeon volumes were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 71,937 patients undergoing tricuspid operations. Median patient age was 66 years (interquartile range, 53-74 years), 56% (n = 40,590) were women, and the median ejection fraction was 0.56 (interquartile range, 0.48-0.60). Tricuspid operations were concomitant in 87% (n = 62,457), elective in 62% (n = 44,393), and included repair in 86% (n = 61,720). Overall postoperative incidence of a PPM was 15% (n = 10,857); 13% (n = 8304) after repair and 25% (n = 2553) after replacement; and 4% (n = 174) for isolated tricuspid repair and 24% (n = 1248) for isolated tricuspid replacement. Multivariable analysis showed baseline characteristics, endocarditis, concomitant operations, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, tricuspid replacement, and lower hospital and surgeon tricuspid operative volumes were independently associated with greater risk for a PPM. After adjustment, tricuspid replacement had 3.2-times greater PPM risk compared with tricuspid repair.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nationally, 15% of patients undergoing tricuspid operations required postoperative PPM implantation. PPM risk was increased with concomitant valve operations, tricuspid replacement, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, and operations performed by less experienced surgeons and centers. Innovation is needed to decrease this significant morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation are common after tricuspid valve operations, although the incidence is variable. This study investigated contemporary rates of and risk factors for a PPM after tricuspid operations.

Methods: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database was used to identify patients with tricuspid repair or replacement from 2011 to 2020. Factors independently associated with the risk of a postoperative PPM during the index hospital admission were examined using multivariable logistic regression with a complete case approach. Annualized hospital and surgeon volumes were calculated.

Results: We identified 71,937 patients undergoing tricuspid operations. Median patient age was 66 years (interquartile range, 53-74 years), 56% (n = 40,590) were women, and the median ejection fraction was 0.56 (interquartile range, 0.48-0.60). Tricuspid operations were concomitant in 87% (n = 62,457), elective in 62% (n = 44,393), and included repair in 86% (n = 61,720). Overall postoperative incidence of a PPM was 15% (n = 10,857); 13% (n = 8304) after repair and 25% (n = 2553) after replacement; and 4% (n = 174) for isolated tricuspid repair and 24% (n = 1248) for isolated tricuspid replacement. Multivariable analysis showed baseline characteristics, endocarditis, concomitant operations, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, tricuspid replacement, and lower hospital and surgeon tricuspid operative volumes were independently associated with greater risk for a PPM. After adjustment, tricuspid replacement had 3.2-times greater PPM risk compared with tricuspid repair.

Conclusions: Nationally, 15% of patients undergoing tricuspid operations required postoperative PPM implantation. PPM risk was increased with concomitant valve operations, tricuspid replacement, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, and operations performed by less experienced surgeons and centers. Innovation is needed to decrease this significant morbidity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三尖瓣手术后安置永久起搏器的相关因素。
背景:需要植入永久起搏器(PPM)的传导异常在三尖瓣手术后很常见,但发生率不一。本研究旨在调查三尖瓣手术后 PPM 的当代发病率和风险因素:方法:使用胸外科医师学会成人心脏手术数据库来识别 2011 年至 2020 年期间接受三尖瓣修复或置换手术的患者。采用完整病例法的多变量逻辑回归研究了与指数入院期间术后PPM风险独立相关的因素。结果:我们确定了 71,937 名接受三尖瓣手术的患者。患者年龄中位数为66(53-74)岁,56%为女性(n=40,590),射血分数中位数为56%(48%-60%)。87%(62,457 人)的患者同时进行了三尖瓣手术,62%(44,393 人)的患者为选择性手术,86%(61,720 人)的患者进行了修复手术。术后PPM总发生率为15%(n=10857);修复术后为13%(n=8304),置换术后为25%(n=2553);孤立三尖瓣修复术为4%(n=174),孤立三尖瓣置换术为24%(n=1248)。多变量分析表明,基线特征、心内膜炎、同时进行的手术、CPB 时间较长、三尖瓣置换术以及医院和外科医生三尖瓣手术量较低与 PPM 风险较高独立相关。经调整后,三尖瓣置换术的PPM风险是三尖瓣修复术的3.2倍:全国有15%的三尖瓣手术患者需要在术后植入PPM。如果同时进行瓣膜手术、三尖瓣置换术、CPB 时间较长以及由经验较少的外科医生和中心进行手术,则 PPM 风险会增加。需要创新来降低这一重大发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in Donation after Cardiac and Brain Death Donation. Does High Standard Uptake Value on Positron Emission Tomography Preclude Sublobar Resection in Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer ≤2cm? Sequential Grafting of the Left Internal Thoracic Artery to the Left Anterior Descending Artery and Graft Failure. Clinical Outcomes and Costs of Robotic-assisted versus Conventional Mitral Valve Repair: A National Analysis. Fragmented care, Commission on Cancer Accreditation and Overall Survival in Patients Receiving Surgery and Chemotherapy for Lung Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1