Exploring differences in perceived barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccine uptake and testing intention by vaccination status and testing hesitancy among rural Latino communities in Southwest Florida.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES Ethnicity & Health Pub Date : 2024-10-12 DOI:10.1080/13557858.2024.2412850
Laura Redwine, Acadia W Buro, Diana Rancourt, Kyaien Conner, Heewon L Gray, Carmen Rodriguez, Rocio Bailey, Kevin Roman Candelaria, Marilyn Stern
{"title":"Exploring differences in perceived barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccine uptake and testing intention by vaccination status and testing hesitancy among rural Latino communities in Southwest Florida.","authors":"Laura Redwine, Acadia W Buro, Diana Rancourt, Kyaien Conner, Heewon L Gray, Carmen Rodriguez, Rocio Bailey, Kevin Roman Candelaria, Marilyn Stern","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2024.2412850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying factors impacting vaccination and testing for COVID-19 is crucial to reduce health disparities, especially for rural/agricultural, low access and high poverty Latino communities disproportionately affected by the pandemic. This study examined differences in perceived barriers and facilitators (such as values, beliefs, and concerns) to COVID-19 vaccine uptake and testing intention by vaccination status and testing hesitancy among rural Latino community members in Southwest Florida.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rural Latino community members (<i>N</i> = 493) completed a cross-sectional survey in Spanish (86.0%) or English (14.0%) on perceived COVID-19 vaccine/testing barriers and facilitators, as well as demographics, mental health, medical history, health perceptions, and health literacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the time of the survey, approximately 43% of participants were unvaccinated and 46.4% were testing hesitant. Significantly more vaccinated participants acknowledged keeping their family (<i>d</i> = .25), community (<i>d</i> = .27), and themselves (<i>d</i> = .22) safe as facilitators to vaccination (ps < .001). Among the unvaccinated participants, the most common concerns for getting vaccinated were side effects (<i>d</i> = -.53) and lack of knowledge about how the vaccine works (<i>d</i> = -.35, <i>p</i>s < .001). Testing hesitant participants reported concerns including not knowing where to get tested (<i>d</i> = -.25, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and less confidence in a positive test result (<i>d</i> = -.40, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Doctors and faith leaders were ranked as the most trusted information sources across groups. In logistic regression models, vaccination was linked to age, gender, education, and protecting others, while concerns about needles and side effects reduced odds; testing was driven by education, anxiety, hope, and safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Promoting family and community safety may be effective facilitators influencing vaccine and testing intention in rural Latino communities. Enhanced education by trusted information sources, such as doctors and faith leaders may alleviate associated concerns. Our findings may inform actions for future pandemics. Further studies should determine the generalizability of our findings across other rural migrant communities and other vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2024.2412850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying factors impacting vaccination and testing for COVID-19 is crucial to reduce health disparities, especially for rural/agricultural, low access and high poverty Latino communities disproportionately affected by the pandemic. This study examined differences in perceived barriers and facilitators (such as values, beliefs, and concerns) to COVID-19 vaccine uptake and testing intention by vaccination status and testing hesitancy among rural Latino community members in Southwest Florida.

Methods: Rural Latino community members (N = 493) completed a cross-sectional survey in Spanish (86.0%) or English (14.0%) on perceived COVID-19 vaccine/testing barriers and facilitators, as well as demographics, mental health, medical history, health perceptions, and health literacy.

Results: At the time of the survey, approximately 43% of participants were unvaccinated and 46.4% were testing hesitant. Significantly more vaccinated participants acknowledged keeping their family (d = .25), community (d = .27), and themselves (d = .22) safe as facilitators to vaccination (ps < .001). Among the unvaccinated participants, the most common concerns for getting vaccinated were side effects (d = -.53) and lack of knowledge about how the vaccine works (d = -.35, ps < .001). Testing hesitant participants reported concerns including not knowing where to get tested (d = -.25, p = 0.01) and less confidence in a positive test result (d = -.40, p < 0.001). Doctors and faith leaders were ranked as the most trusted information sources across groups. In logistic regression models, vaccination was linked to age, gender, education, and protecting others, while concerns about needles and side effects reduced odds; testing was driven by education, anxiety, hope, and safety concerns.

Conclusion: Promoting family and community safety may be effective facilitators influencing vaccine and testing intention in rural Latino communities. Enhanced education by trusted information sources, such as doctors and faith leaders may alleviate associated concerns. Our findings may inform actions for future pandemics. Further studies should determine the generalizability of our findings across other rural migrant communities and other vaccines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据佛罗里达州西南部拉丁裔农村社区的疫苗接种状况和检测犹豫程度,探索 COVID-19 疫苗接种和检测意向所面临的障碍和促进因素的差异。
背景:确定影响 COVID-19 疫苗接种和检测的因素对于减少健康差异至关重要,尤其是对于受该流行病影响尤为严重的农村/农业、低接入率和高贫困率拉丁裔社区而言。本研究调查了佛罗里达州西南部农村拉丁裔社区成员在接受 COVID-19 疫苗接种和检测意向方面所感知到的障碍和促进因素(如价值观、信仰和顾虑)的差异,并根据疫苗接种状况和检测犹豫程度进行了分析:农村拉丁裔社区成员(N = 493)用西班牙语(86.0%)或英语(14.0%)完成了一项横断面调查,内容涉及他们认为的 COVID-19 疫苗接种/检测障碍和促进因素,以及人口统计学、心理健康、病史、健康观念和健康知识:调查时,约 43% 的参与者未接种疫苗,46.4% 的参与者对检测犹豫不决。已接种疫苗的参与者中,承认保证家人(d = 0.25)、社区(d = 0.27)和自身(d = 0.22)安全是接种疫苗的促进因素(ps d = -.53)和缺乏疫苗作用知识(d = -.35,ps d = -.25,p = 0.01)以及对阳性检测结果信心不足(d = -.40,p 结论:促进家庭和社区安全可能是接种疫苗的关键:促进家庭和社区安全可能是影响农村拉丁裔社区疫苗接种和检测意向的有效因素。医生和宗教领袖等可信赖的信息来源加强教育可能会减轻相关的担忧。我们的研究结果可为未来大流行病的应对措施提供参考。进一步的研究应确定我们的发现在其他农村移民社区和其他疫苗中的通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Health
Ethnicity & Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Health is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.
期刊最新文献
'COVID impacted my life in so many ways': a qualitative study of the lived experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic among people of Black ethnicities living with HIV in England. A paradox of white privilege: race, psychological resilience, and mental well-being during a public health crisis. 'I didn't expect to be so close to being diabetic': beliefs of prediabetes and diabetes prevention among Hispanic men at a federally qualified health center. Psychological distress in Asian American informal caregivers: an analysis by disaggregated ethnic groups. Racial diversity, interracial trust, and mental distress in post-apartheid South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1